MOs|| @@@ @@@@6MM"l=\|7| EN DB | %    & . 67_wOG ee /  wWG X  o  s    > .9  0  )E o[ 6 S >Q $  M Landesman1995windpwindPpwindPwind9wind?wind?wind_windZPwind:wind9windwind0wind?windwindPwind0wind?wind?windPwind?wind8wind8wind8windwind?wind0wind`windwind@windwind\?wind[?windZPwindT?windSWpwindROwindQWwindP=windM?_windK1PwindJZwindI1 windH?_pwindG?windFuPwindEwindDwindCu0windB?pwind*Zpwind)?wind&wind%wind$> wind#>@wind"pwind!>wind =windpwind1pwindWwind?lM Laufer2003u Leung2001 Lewer Lewis2000 Lewis2000j Lewis2001 Lewis2001" Lewis2001 Lewis2004 Li2002 Liaw1999 Liedtka2002 Little2004 Loucks1999 Louwers2005 Lydenberg1993 Lydenberg2003 MacDonalad2004G MacDougall2001 Mackenzie1998 Mackenzie2000j Mackenzie2001 Maignan2004 Makower1994Malhotra1999P Malone1997 Malotky2003Mandondo1997P Manheim2004 Mani2003| MansleyMarkham Thompson2004Marshall1997oMarshall20030 Martin2002 Mathew2003 Mays2003 McCullough1999McDonald2001 McEwan2001 McGuire2001 McLachlan2003O McLachlan2004McMillan1996P Mele20040> Mendus19999@ Michelson2004P Michelson2004 Miller1998 Miller19999  Millington2004Mills Mistra2004i Mollner2005 Monks2002 Moore2003 MPI2001 Murphy1995 Murphy1996Q Nagel1986{ Nahan2002 Nair2005 Neelankavil1996Nordgren2002P O'Day1999n O'Neill1996=7Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.2001 Pallab2000Paolillo2003P Parker19939  Parker1994 Pava1996 Payne2002 Pearce2005 Perry2001 Peter2002 Pettinger2004S Pettit1986~ Pietilainen2004 Poitras1994 Powell1995 Preece20033 Prior Jonson2001 Pryce2002 Purcell1980 Pustay20055 Quarter Quarter2001 Rae2004kReder Reder1994 Reeve1999 Reilly2000v Resnik2003 Risser1996 Rivoli2003T Rivoli2003 Rodman1998 Rollin1995Rongione1995P Rose2001RosenRosen Rosen2001 Rosenthal2002:Rowlands19999 Rugman2001 SandlerU Scanlon1977V Scanlon1982 ScheerSchepers2003Schermerhorn Jr1999 Schiavo-Campo1999 Schlossberger1994 Schlossberger1998W Schueth1997X Schueth2000Y Schueth2003ZSchwartz2003p[Schwartz2003pD Schwarz1996 Scott2005\ Sen1977 Sethi2003 Sethi2005 Shailer2004Shani Shanks19931 Shanks19941Sharfman1996PShepherd1995Pp SIF2003 SIF2005 Silverstein1993) Sinclair] Singer1991 Singer1999 SIO200,^ Slote1997_ Smart1961h Smith2000 Solnik2000 Solomon1999 Sousa2001 Sparkes2001 Sparkes2002a Sparkes2004 Spiller2000 Stell1995  Stephenson1993 Stewart Stewart1996 Stolovitch1999StoneStrawser2001PcStrudler2003`Sullivan2001SustainAbility2004%Swift Takala2000 Taylor2000 Taylor2001 Taylor2002xTEC!The-Allen-Consulting-Group2000" The-Economist2005 Thomas20030D Thomson1996 Tigner20000u Tippet2001v Tippet2001 Tommasi1999Topp0Topp0 Torrens Tran2000 Tsai19939 Turner1993\van der Heijden2004 Van Helvoort1993 Vega2002 Veit19959 Veit19966 Veit1996 Veit19988 Vitell2003 Vogel1993h Waddock2000i Waddock2002g Waddock2003@ Wailes20040P Wailes20040 Wallace2001 Walley1994  Waring Warren1999o Watson20032 Weaver1995j Webley2001 Webster2001? Weis20000 Whitehead1937 Whitehead1994 Wilcox19988Williams2002Williams2003Williams2005 Willis2002 Winnett2000 Winston2002 Wong2004 Wueste1994 Wulfson2001k Yach20013 Yeomans2005 Yeow0G Zadek2001 Zadek2004 Zhang1996t Zientek2003 Zwetsloot2003e2000j Mackenzie2001 Maignan2004 Makower1994Malhotra1999P Malone1997 Malotky2003Mandondo1997P Manheim2004 Mani2003| MansleyMarkham Thompson2004oMarshall20030 Martin2002 Mathew2003 Mays2003 McCullough1999McDonald2001 McEwan2001 McGuire2001O McLachlan2004McMillan1996P Mele20040> Mendus19999@ Michelson2004P Michelson2004 Miller1998 Miller19999  Millington2004Mills Mistra2004i Moore2003 MPI2001 Murphy1995 Murphy1996Q Nagel1986{ Nahan2002 Neelankavil1996Nordgren2002P O'Day1999n O'Neill1996=7Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.2001 Pallab2000Paolillo2003P Parker19939  Parker1994 Pava1996 Payne2002 Perry2001 Peter2002 Pettinger2004S Pettit1986~ Pietilainen2004 Poitras1994 Powell1995 Prior Jonson2001 Pryce2002 Purcell1980 Pustay20055 Rae2004kReder Reder1994 Reeve1999 Reilly2000v Resnik2003 Risser1996 Rivoli2003T Rivoli2003 Rodman1998 Rollin1995Rongione1995P Rose2001RosenRosen Rosenthal2002:Rowlands19999 Rugman2001 SandlerU Scanlon1977V Scanlon1982 ScheerSchepers2003Schermerhorn Jr1999 Schiavo-Campo1999 Schlossberger1994 Schlossberger1998W Schueth1997X Schueth2000Y Schueth2003Schwartz2003PZSchwartz2003p[Schwartz2003pD Schwarz1996\ Sen1977 Sethi2003 Shailer2004Shani  Shanks19931  Shanks19941Sharfman1996PShepherd1995Pp SIF2003 SIF2005 Silverstein1993) Sinclair] Singer1991 Singer1999^ Slote1997_ Smart1961h Smith2000 Solnik2000 Solomon1999 Sparkes2001 Sparkes2002a Sparkes2004 Spiller2000 Stell1995  Stephenson1993 Stewart Stewart1996 Stolovitch1999StoneStrawser2001PcStrudler2003`Sullivan2001SustainAbility2004%Swift Takala2000 Taylor2000 Taylor2001 Taylor2002xTEC!The-Allen-Consulting-Group2000" The-Economist2005 Thomas20030D Thomson1996u Tippet2001v Tippet2001 Tommasi1999Topp0Topp0 Torrens Tran2000 Tsai19939 Turner1993\van der Heijden2004 Van Helvoort1993 Vega2002 Veit19959 Veit19966 Veit1996 Veit19988 Vitell2003 Vogel1993h Waddock2000i Waddock2002g Waddock2003@ Wailes20040P Wailes20040 Wallace2001 Walley1994  Waring Warren1999o Watson20032 Weaver1995j Webley2001 Webster2001? Weis20000 Whitehead1937 Whitehead1994 Wilcox19988Williams2003 Willis2002 Winnett2000 Winston2002 Wong2004 Wueste1994 Wulfson2001k Yach20013 Yeow0G Zadek2001 Zadek2004 Zhang1996t Zientek2003 Zwetsloot2003y8(4NF7,)E/P<0>' !-6#G:8?2 ".HB$;=&5JA@3 Y??q0??p?6?p0cntlà?xntl?p 0P?P ?p6 ?0Ycntl ?ocntl 5cntl ?ppcntl ?pP Authors*Journals CKeywords L6                               1@ + zAasland, Dag C.Abbarno, G. J. M.Adler, Jonathan H. Albertson, Joshua Ali, PaulAlmond, BrendaAnderson, Digby C. Anon Arbouw, JohnAristondo, JuanArmstrong, Robert W. Arnold, KeithASFAAsian Development Bank.+LASICAslaksen, Julie<8Australia), ASFA (Association of Superannuation Funds ofBaden, John A.Baker, H. Kent Bandow, DougBansal, PratimaBanthin, JoannaBarbut, Monique Barnes, Peter Baue, WilliamBeauchamp, Tom L.Bellet, SuzanneBelliotti, Raymond Bemporad, Jules R. Black, MichaelBoatright, John R. Boatright, John Raymond+LBodwell, CharlesBone, Paula Fitzgerald @Bonvin, Jean MichelBoselovic, LenBrammer, StephenBrennan, Geoffrey Brill, Jack*Brinchmann, Sissel Broadhurst, Arlene I.Broadhurst, DominicBrown, Keith C.Buchholz, Rogene A.Bukovansky, MladaByrne, Edmund F. Camejo, PeterCarmichael, IslaCarpenter, JaniceCarroll, Archie BCarroll, Archie B. Carson, A. ScottCarson, Thomas L.Carswell, Adam0+Centre for Professional Development (Aust.)QChadwick, Ruth F.Chambers, JeanCheong, JosephaChitsomboon, PloyChristensen, Sandra L.(+L Christian-AidChristie, DrewChryssides, George D.Clark, Charles R.Clark, John M.Clark-Murphy, Marilyn Clarke, James Clarke, JuliaClement, Roland C. Cocklin, ChrisCohen, Bennett J. Cohen, Carl*Coltman, Michael M.Corey, Robert JohnCornell, John F.Cosier, Richard A.Cowton, Christopher JCowton, Christopher J.(+L Cox, Paul Coxon, Amy(*Cramer, Jacqueline Crisp, RogerCummings, Lorne SDalton, Dan R.Davidson, AmandaDavidson, ColinDavies, GraemeDavis, StephenDe Grazia, DavidDembinski, Paul H. Den Uyl, Douglas J.$Deni-Green-Consulting-ServicesDerkley, Karin Dewe, PhilipDi Norcia, VincentDillenburg, StephenDiltz, J DavidDoh, Jonathan P. Domini, AmyDommen, DeouardDorn, A. Walter Dreier, JamesDresser, RebeccaDunfee, Thomas W. Duska, RonaldEIRIS Elgie, SusanElkington, John Emerson, JedEnglish, Dan C.Erekson, Homer Ethibel EurosifEverett, Jennifer Ezell, Hank Fayers, ChrisFelicetti, LindaFerling, Rhona L.Ferrell, LindaFerrell, O. C. Ferrell, O.C.Ferrer, Jorge J.  C A 0.618...D?ADWEEK New England Edition0888-0840May 20, 2002, v39 i21, p6(1)D40Africa News ServiceApril 29, 2003, p1008119u8027X($Africa News ServiceMay 21, 2004, pNA, Agriculture and Human Values"41Algemeen Nederlands Tijdschrift voor WijsbegeerteAlternatives Journal4.America0002-7049July 17, 1993, v169, n2, p5(1)3, Analysis Applied Financial EconomicsDB,)AScribe Law News ServiceFeb 23, 2004, pNA@Energy & Environmental Management1460-7530Nov-Dec 2003, p18(2)lDEnvironmental Ethics Erkenntnis Ethical Investor EthicsEthics and Behavior$ Ethics and International AffairsEthics and Medicine0*European Report1021-4267Oct 22, 2003, p343 ($Euroweek0952-7036Feb 15, 2002, p8(1) (%Euroweek0952-7036Feb 22, 2002, p24(1)0*Euroweek0952-7036July 11, 2003 i811, p8(1) (%Euroweek0952-7036June 21, 2002, p7(1)<8Financial Executive0895-4186Nov-Dec 1993, v9, n6, p54(3)Financial PlanningFinancial TimesFinancial World3 FortuneN|40Geographical0016-741XAugust 2002, v74 i8, p48(3) @=Greener Management International0966-9671Spring 2001, p31(14) Gregorianum4/Habitat Australia0310-2939Oct 2000, v28 i5, p28.XHarvard Business ReviewHarvard Law ReviewN|Hastings Center Report$!HealthCare Ethics Committee Forum0+History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences Hypatia  D V,)՜.+,0@ hp ,)****.**+,*0@ hp**** ****0+***Oh*+'**0****** 0<*<0+Oh+'0 0<<i4@*4NormalCJOJPJQJmH ;#. & 3B2A$#6,44G8@ - 7(!-" 7GP-H"" G7):6? -P nt. zk2LWhitehead, T.N.u 193782Social and Political Tendencies of the Present DayHarvard Business Reviewe153u 275-82on fileiHistory Regulation~xThe Role of the Global Reporting Initiative's Sustainability Reporting Guidelines in the Social Screening of Investments Willis, Alan Journal of Business Ethics433233-237 0167-4544Social screening of investments calls not only for investment policy and criteria, but also for information about companies, their policies, practices and performance. The Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) and its June 2000 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines have the potential to significantly improve the usefulness and quality of information reported by companies about their environmental, social and economic impacts and performance. (edited)81Ethics ; Global ; Investment ; Screening ; SocialMr III 03 English 2002"Winnett, Adrian Lewis, Alan 2000vp"You'd have to be green to invest in this": Popular economic models, financial journalism and ethical investment$Journal of Economic Psychology21 319-39abstract on file,%ethical investment economic discourseBgNihHRVogel, David Turner, Tom Barnes, Peter Lydenberg, Steven D. Bandow, Doug Adler, Jonathan H. Silverstein, Michael Henderson, Hazel Foegen, J. H. Parker, Alan Tsai, Frank Frech, J. Clayton 1993(!Can slower growth save the world?n"Business and Society Review85 10-20e A140656136table illustration0019848X@9Corporate Responsibility Audits: Doing Well by Doing Goody Sandra Waddock Neil SmithWORD COUNT: 4857Sloan Management Review Winter 2000 75-83412Responsibility audits are a management tool for demonstrating the potential qualitative and financial benefits of mirroring core values and ethics in day-to-day practice. It is argued that corporate financial performance and socially responsible practices are positively correlated. A responsibility auditing process that improves both the bottom line and a firm's stakeholder relationships with owners, employees, suppliers, customers, local communities, and government entities. Companies typically overlook the hidden costs of problematic or less responsible practices. Examples are cited of how operating responsibly often saves money (in overhead, employee turnover rates, insurance costs, and other value-added expenses) and may even create profitable new opportunities.d]United States; US Corporate responsibility Advantages Financial performance Management audits107955452+Responsibility: The new business imperativeS60Sandra A Waddock Charles Bodwell Samuel B Graves*#The Academy of Management Executive May 2002132-148162OBusinesses today are experiencing profound pressures to reform and improve stakeholder-related practices and their impacts on stakeholders and the natural environment - in short, to manage responsibly as well as profitably. Pressures for expanding the emphasis on profits to managing responsibly derive from 3 general sources: primary stakeholders such as owners, employees, customers, and supplier; secondary stakeholders such as non-governmental organizations, activists, communities, and governments; and general societal trends and institutional forces. The latter include a proliferation of "best of" rankings, the steady emergence and development of global principle and standards that are raising public expectations about corporate responsibility, and new reporting initiatives emphasizing the so-called triple bottom lines of economic, social, and environmental performance. To respond to these pressures, many multinational corporations in particular are developing what has been called total responsibility management systems approaches for managing their responsibilities to stakeholders and the natural environment. This article outlines the dominant pressures pushing the evolution of total responsibility management and present as a managerial framework that highlights the 3 main components of TRM approaches - inspiration (vision), integration, and improvement/innovation - with the indicators inherent to a responsibility measurement approach. `ZUnited States; US Corporate responsibility Corporate management Multinational corporationsSandra Waddock 2003F@Stakeholder performance implications of corporate responsibility>8International Journal of Business Performance Management5e 2,3a114-124p13684892rkUnited States; US Corporate responsibility Shareholder relations Best practice Studies Correlation analysis: Demands for greater integrity - more corporate responsibility - are an increasingly critical element of doing well and doing "good" in today's business environment. Using a definition of corporate citizenship that links stakeholder-related operating practices to corporate responsibility, this paper explores the performance implications of companies treating stakeholders well. Companies face conflicting pressures, one set for profitability and wealth maximization; the other is to manage more responsibly, with more accountability and transparency. Specifically, the paper addresses the ways in which companies can benefit from - or be hurt by - some general emerging institutional pressures that push in the direction of greater responsibility. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]&Walley, Noah Whitehead, Bradley 1994 It's Not Easy Being GreenoHarvard Business Reviewp?i 46-52oon file\Sustainable developmentnThe idea that environmental initiatives will systematically increase profitability has tremendous appeal. Unfortunately, this popular idea is also unrealistic. (46) We do not argue that win-win situations do not exist; in fac, they do, but they are very rare and will likely be overshadowed by the totla cost of a company's environmental program. (46) Gives history of corporate environmental reform: 1970-75: compliance with regulations, fighting reform; mid-late 80s: maturing, managers looked beyond narrow, predominantly technical approach - 'embracing environmental issues without innovating'. The emergence of the win-win mindset is a direct reuslt of the extraordinary success companies achieved in reducing pollution in the second era. (48) 1993 poll found that over two-thirds of Americans do not believe the country must choose between environmental protection and economic development. (48) A120909595hbThe impact of socially responsible investment on human resource management: a conceptual framework Waring, Peter Lewer, JohnHAJournal of Business Ethics0167-4544June 15, 2004, v52 i1, p99(10)^S2p B;The Protection Laboratory Animals: A Response to Stephenson{ Parker, James ("Journal of Medicine and Philosophy194389-394 0360-5310This paper clarifies certain issues raised by Wendell Stephenson ("The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy" 18: 375-388, 1993) about research programs and animal care practices at the Oregon Regional Primate Research Center. It also responds to Stephenson's critique of the National Institute of Health's "Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals". It identifies utilitarianism as the ethical theory underlying Stephenson's critique. Arguing that such an ethical theory is unworkable in addressing concerns about biomedical research and the use of animals the paper defends the "Guide's" reliance on a wider tradition of ethical theories.F?Animal ; Ethics ; Medicine ; Research ; Suffering Stephenson, W Ag 94 English 1994tmThe Association between Corporate Social-Responsibility and Financial Performance: The Paradox of Social Cost$Pava, Moses L. Krausz, Joshua Journal of Business Ethics153{321-357 0167-4544It is generally assumed that common stock investors are exclusively interested in earning the highest level of future cash-flow for a given amount of risk. This view suggests that investors select a well-diversified portfolio of securities to achieve this goal. Accordingly, it is often assumed that investors are unwilling to pay a premium for corporate behavior which can be described as "socially-responsible." Recently, this view has been under increasing attack. According to the Social Investment Forum, at least 538 institutional investors now allocate funds using social screens or criteria. In addition, Alice Tepper Marlin, president of the New York-based Council on Economic Priorities has recently estimated that about $600 billion of invested funds are socially-screened (1992).NHCorporation ; Ethics ; Finance ; Responsibility ; Risk ; Society ; Stock M 96 English 1996$Pearce, John Doh, Jonathan P. 2005:3The High Impact of Collaborative Social Initiatives"MIT Sloan Management Review4463u 30-397 filed under P7CSR collaborationHALooks at principles for CSR initiatives and various case studies.82A Compassionate Autonomy Alternative to SpeciesismPerry, Constance K.{("Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics223O237-246 1386-74150*Many people in the animal welfare community have argued that the use of nonhuman animals in medical research is necessarily based on speciesism, an unjustified prejudice based on species membership. As such it is morally akin to racism and sexism. This is misguided. The combined capacities for autonomy and sentience with the obligations derived from relations support a morally justifiable rationale for using some nonhuman animals in order to limit the risk of harm to humans. There may be a few cases where it is morally better to use a never sentient human than a sentient animal, but these cases are few and would not fulfill the current need for research subjects. The use of nonautonomous animals instead of humans in risky research can be based on solid moral ground. It is not necessarily speciesism.:4Animal ; Autonomy ; Ethics ; Experiment ; Speciesism Je 01 English 20014-Jefferson and the Independence of GenerationsPeter, Kenneth B.oEnvironmental Ethics244371-387e 0163-4275nThomas Jefferson's argument against long-term debt and his theory of usufruct are used to show why each generation is obligated to protect the independence of future generations. This argument forms the theory of "Jeffersonian generational independence." The theory has wide implications for the environmental movement because most environmental problems result in limitations on the liberty of future generations. I compare and defend Jeffersonian generational independence from two alternatives including the investment theory raised by James Madison and the problem of generational interdependence raised by John Passmore or Edmund Burke. (edited)RKEnvironment ; Ethics ; Future Generation; Obligation ; Protection JeffersonWint 2002 English 20021403913277 (pbk.)Pettinger, Richard(!Contemporary strategic management 4.Houndmills, Balsingstoke, Hampshire ; New York Palgrave 2004 xxiv, 520@92004044270 Richard Pettinger. Includes bibliographical references (p. 505-506) and index. Pt. I. The context and environment of strategic management -- 1. Introduction -- 2. Strategic thinking -- 3. The nature of competition -- 4. Analysing the environment -- 5. The foundations of competitive strategy -- Pt. II. Strategic management in practice -- 6. Strategic management in practice -- 7. Investment appraisal -- 8. Strategic management of market segments -- 9. Strategic management of customers and clients -- 10. Strategic management of products and services -- Pt. III. The development of strategic management -- 11. Managing change -- 12. Strategic management and organisation structure -- 13. Strategic approaches to risk management -- 14. Strategic management and ethics -- 15. Strategic performance management -- Pt. IV. Enduring priorities in strategic management -- 16. Leadership -- 17. Organisation development -- 18. Strategic management development -- 19. Strategic management and globalisation -- 20. The strategic management of public services -- 21. Conclusions.d^"Contemporary Strategic Management uses up-to-date organisations and situations such as Barbie, rebuilding Iraq, easyJet and McDonald's to emphasise the practical side of strategy, while at the same time illustrating the theoretical issues involved." "Richard Pettinger discusses strategic analysis and choice, strategic failures and successes, investment appraisal, ethics, implementation and the development of strategic management from a managerial perspective. This approach will appeal especially to MBA and final-year management students who appreciate the 'hands on' feel of the text."--BOOK JACKET.Strategic planning.QGU Logan On Order"Restrictive Consequentialism& Pettit, Philip Brennan, Geoffrey("Australasian Journal of Philosophy64438-455 0004-8402iConsequentialists claim to be able to endorse non-consequentialist modes of deliberation; their opponents typically deny that they can allow this restriction. this paper makes a case for why the consequentialist agent can restrict his deliberation. the key idea is that that may be the only way of promoting certain consequences. a taxonomy is provided of the sorts of consequences which can only be promoted by restrictive decision making.60Act ; Consequentialism ; Ethics ; Self Deception"D 86 ENGLISH JOURNAL-ARTICLE 1986 *+ (Mulligan, ThomasMurphy, Michael R.  Nagel, Thomas Nahan, MikeNair, ChandranNeelankavil, James P.Nelson, James L.Noonan Jr, John T. Nordgren, AndersNunan, RichardNuyens, F. J. C. J. O'Day, Ken(*O'Neill, Onora<7Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.͜ Pallab, PaulPaolillo, Joseph G. P.(+L Parker, Alan Parker, James Pava, Moses LPava, Moses L. Payne, Dinah Pearce, JohnPederson, LauraPerry, Constance K.Peter, Kenneth B.Pettinger, Richard Pettit, PhilipPietilainen, TarjaPoitras, GeoffreyPool, Lisa Van Der Powell, Gary E.Pratt, Cornelius B.Preece, DiannaPrior Jonson, Elizabeth+L Pryce, VickyPurcell, TheodorePustay, Michael W.  Quarter, Jack Rae, Scott B. Reder, Alan*Reeve, James M.Regan, T. O. M.Reilly, Frank K.Resnik, David B.Rhodes, Robert P.Risser, David T.Rivoli, PietraRodman, Kenneth A. Rollin, Bernard E. Rongione, Nicholas  Rose, JamesRosen, Barry N. Rosen, RobertRosenthal, Sandra B.Rowlands, Ian HRugman, Alan M.Ryder, Richard DudleySandler, Dennis M. Sapontzis, S. F.Scanlon, T. M. Scheer, RoddySchepers, DonaldSchermerhorn Jr, John R.LSchiavo-Campo, SalvatoreLSchlossberger, EugeneSchueth, SteveSchwartz, Mark SSchwartz, Mark S.Schwarz, Stephen D. Scott, MikeSelf, Donnie J.Sen, Amartya K.Sethi, S. Prakash Shailer, Greg Shani, David Shanks, NiallSharfman, MarkShepherd, RichardShiu, Godwin Y.SIFSilverstein, MichaelSinclair, Graham Singer, PeterSIOSlote, Michael Smart, John Jamieson Carswell Smith, Neil*Solnik, Bruno H.Solomon, Robert Sousa, JorgeSparkes, RussellSpiller, RodgerSprigge, T. L. S.Stanley, Marjorie T.Stell, Lance K.Stelzer, LeighStephenson, WendellStevenson, GelvinStewart, JulesStewart, KarenStolovitch, Harold D.Stone, Brett A.Strawser, Joyce A. Strudler, AlanSullivan, RorySustainAbilitySwain, Margaret S.  Sweeney, JillSwift, Brendan Takala, T.(*Taylor, RobertTEC Teoh, Hai Yap The-Allen-Consulting-Group The-EconomistThomas, James L.Thomson, Judith Jarvis(+L Tigner, Joyce Tippet, JohnTommasi, DanielTomson, Farol N. Topp, Garry*Torrens, Paul R. Tran, Van Hoa Tsai, Frank* Turner, Tom*Van De Veer, Donaldvan der Heijden, Angelavan der Laan, SandraVan Helvoort, Ton Vega, Gina(*Veit, E. TheodoreVeit, TheodoreVisscher, Maurice BolkesLVitell, Scott J. Vogel, DavidWaddock, SandraWaddock, Sandra A Wailes, NickWallace, William Walley, Noah Waring, PeterWarren, Carl S.Watson, JanetteWeaver, Daniel G. Webley, PaulWebster, FrankWeis, AlexanderWhitehead, BradleyWhitehead, T.N.Wilcox, ShelleyWilliams, Andrew T.Williams, Gill Willis, AlanWinnett, AdrianWinston, MortonWong, Kenman L.Wueste, Daniel E.Wulfson, Myrna Yach, Derek*Yeomans, Matthew Yeow, Leng(* Zack, Jeffrey Zadek, Simon Zhang, Yong*Zientek, David M. Zwetsloot, Gerard I. J. M.LDK8*$0333961250 (cloth) 033396814X (pbk.)("Non-state actors in world politics :3Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire ; New York, N.Y.i Palgrave 2001 xiii, 2942001033120 edited by Daphn Josselin and William Wallace. Includes bibliographical references (p. 261-282) and index. Pt. I. Introduction. The State and Other Actors / Pt. II. Non-State Actors and Principled Beliefs. How Many Divisions? The Catholic Church in World Politics / Political Parties in Global Politics / Does "World Opinion" Exist? / Non-State Actors as Moral Entrepreneurs: A Transnational Perspective on Ethics Networks / Pt. III. Experts and Interests in Global Governance. The "Policy Research" Knowledge Elite and Global Policy Processes / Transnational Corporations and Global Environmental Politics / Mind the Gap: Trade Unions in a Global Age / Policy Networks, Non-State Actors and Internationalized Policy-Making: A Case-Study of Agricultural Trade / Unraveling the Faustian Bargain: Non-State Actors and the Multilateral Agreement on Investment / Pt. IV. The State Under Siege? Outsourcing War / Underworld and Upperworld: Transnational Organized Crime and Global Society / Diasporas in World Politics / The Islamic Movement as Non-State Actor / Pt. V. Conclusion. Non-State Actors in World Politics: The Lessons / The Romance of Non-State Actors /$"The involvement of non-state actors in world politics can hardly be characterized as novel, but intensifying economic and social exchange and the emergence of new modes of international governance have given them much greater visibility and, many would argue, a more central role. Non-State Actors in World Politics analyzes a diverse range of economic, social, legal (and illegal), old and new actors, such as the Catholic Church, trade unions, diasporas, religious movements, transnational corporations and organized crime."--BOOK JACKET.TNGInternational relations. Globalization. Non-governmental organizations.n(!Josselin, Daphne Wallace, Williaml,&QGU Nathan JZ1305 .N66 2001 In LibraryjcOn the Ethics of Corporate Social Responsibility--Considering the Paradigm of Industrial MetabolismJouni, Korhonenh Journal of Business Ethics484m301-315 0167-4544This paper attempts to bridge business ethics to corporate social responsibility including the social and environmental dimensions. The objective of the paper is to suggest a conceptual methodology with which ethics of corporate environmental management tools can be considered. The method includes two stages that are required for a shift away from the current dominant unsustainable paradigm and toward a more sustainable paradigm. (edited)PIBusiness ; Ecology ; Environment ; Ethics ; Social Responsibility Kuhn, TD (III) 03 English 2003jdEvolution and Implementation: A Study of Values, Business Ethics and Corporate Social Responsibility$Joyner, Brenda E. Payne, Dinah Journal of Business Ethics414297-311 0167-4544This study defines and traces the emergence and evolution within the business literature of the concepts of values, business ethics and corporate social responsibility to illustrate the increased emphasis that has been placed on these issues over time. Two organizations that have successfully dealt with these issues were analyzed to identify the links among values, ethics, and corporate social responsibility as they are incorporated into the culture and management of a firm. (edited)JDBusiness Ethics; Corporation ; Ethics ; Social Responsibility; ValueD III 2002 English 200201674544@9Reasons to be ethical: Self-interest and ethical business John Kaler&Journal of Business Ethics; JBE Sep 2000161-173O27 1/2This paper examines the self-interested reasons that businesses can have for ethical behavior. It distinguishes between economic and non-economic reasons and, among the latter, notes those connected with the self-esteem of managers.`YBusiness ethics Self interest Public opinion Morality Studies Consumer attitudes ManagersZTNon-consequentialism, the Person as an End-in-Itself, and the Significance of Status Kamm, F. M.$Philosophy and Public Affairs+214354-389 0048-3915The article discusses the structure of nonconsequentialism--includingoptions not to maximize the good and restrictions based on the harm/not aid distinction and the intention/foresight distinction--in part by way of consideration of works by Kagan, Quinn, and Thomson. Options are connected with the idea of the person as an aid in itselfas are restrictions on harming some to and others. Consideration is also given to when it is permissible to harm some to and others, as in the trolley problem case.haConsequentialism ; Intentionality ; Morality ; Person ; Social Phil Jarvis, J; Kagan, S; Quinn, WFall 92 English 1992Kamp, Jurriaan 200482How Responsible is Socially Responsible Investing? Ode Magazine21on filea"SRI criticism of SRI Hawken\.(www.odemagazine.com/article.php?aID=4055 Kapelus, Paul 2002zMining, Corporate Social Responsibility and the "Community": The Case of Rio Tinto, Richards Bay Minerals and the Mbonambi Journal of Business Ethics393275-296- 0167-4544. paper on file XQAustralian Corporation Ethics Mining Politics Social Responsibility South AfricaneIn recent years, mining companies operating in developing countries have come under increased pressure as opponents have placed them under greater public scrutiny. Mining companies have responded by developing global corporate social responsibility strategies as part of their larger global business strategies. In these strategies, a prominent place is given to their relationship with local communities. (edited)S I 02 English Keefe, Joe 2004.'What is Socially Responsible Investing?Dragonfly Media Decemberon file3 Hawken SRI82defends the SRI industry against Hawken's critiqueTNhttp://www.dragonflymedia.com/portal/featured_stories/200411/hawken_keefe.htmlO~8 0273643401 McEwan, Tom$2,Managing values and beliefs in organisations Harlow, England ; New York $Financial Times Prentice HallT 2001 xviii, 39000069169 Tom McEwan. Includes bibliographical references and index. Pt. I. Corporate social responsibility, business ethics and corporate governance. 1. The integration of corporate social responsibility, business ethics and corporate governance. 2. Moral reasoning and applied ethics. 3. Values, beliefs and Ideologies. 4. Means/ends analysis and its practical applications -- Pt. II. The Internal environment. 5. Individual morality in organisations. 6. Unethical behaviour by individuals in organisations. 7. The individual and computer/information ethics -- Pt. III. Groups. 8. Employment Issues. 9. Discrimination and equal opportunities -- Pt. IV. The external environment. 10. Marketing and consumers. 11. Environmental protection -- Pt. V. Organisations in a global context. 12. International business and the Third World. 13. Ethical Investment -- Pt. VI. Managing values and beliefs in organisations. 14. Organisational culture and stakeholder theory. 15. Corporate social performance, ethical leadership and reputation management.xBusiness ethics.VPQGU GoldCoast HF5387 .M42 2001 In Library QGU Nathan HF5387 .M42 2001 In LibraryMcLachlan, Jonathan  2003LFEthical Investment: A Comparison of Ethical and Conventional InvestorsBusiness Schoolg Brisbane University of QueenslandHonoursTHE 17293 eco (UQ)some pages PC under Methical investorssought to profile ethical vs conventional investors - small sample size - questionairre approach. check highlighted references(!McLachlan, Jonathan Gardner, Johno 2004F?A Comparison of Socially Responsible and Conventional Investorse&Journal of Business Ethics; JBEo521C 11-25i Jun01674544 paper on file^XStudies Personal finance Comparative analysis Social investing Consumer attitudes ethics"Socially responsible investment is a rapidly emerging phenomenon within the field of personal investment. However, the factors that lead investors to choose socially responsible investment products are not well understood, especially in an Australian context. This study provides a comparative examination of conventional and socially responsible investors, with the aim of identifying such factors. A total of 55 conventional investors and 54 ethical investors participated in the study by completing mailed questionnaires about their investment and general behaviour and their attitudes and beliefs. Results indicated some important differences between socially responsible and conventional investors in their beliefs of the importance of ethical issues, their investment decision-making style, and their perceptions of moral intensity. These results support the notion that socially responsible investors differ in critical ways to conventional investors, and are discussed in terms of theoretical and practical implications. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]WORD COUNT: 75680*Corporate Social Investments: Do They Pay?McMillan, G. Steven Journal of Business Ethics153309-314 0167-4544The stock market reaction to two very different corporate social investments (the 1977 Sullivan Principles adoption announcement and the 1990 McDonald's Corporation environmental statement) is explored. A market model event study methodology is employed using daily stock returns. The results are that the stock market appears to have ignored the 1977 announcement, but rewarded the 1990 event. Future research and possible managerial implications are discussed.NGCorporation ; Ethics ; Investment ; Management ; Society ; Stock Market M 96 English 1996bD'l()" BT Financial Group 2004&Position Paper: Business Ethics3 BT Investment ManagementOctoberR*#Filed under 'electronic references'94-Business Ethics material risk risk managementn A120909597Non-governmental organizations, shareholder activism, and socially responsible investments: ethical, strategic, and governance implications60Guay, Terrence Doh, Jonathan P. Sinclair, GrahamHBJournal of Business Ethics0167-4544June 15, 2004, v52 i1, p125(15) Gunther, Marc 2005,%Are Green Funds True to their Colors?rFortune 1513 106-9 7 Febon fileSRI Hawken ethics 0)discusses Hawken's critique of SRI funds.& A120909592:4Financial markets: a tool for social responsibility?$Haigh, Matthew Hazelton, JamesHAJournal of Business Ethics0167-4544June 15, 2004, v52 i1, p59(13) A104970238Socially responsible investing: why so may critics? The frequent criticism of the socially responsible investment industry is misguided, argue Michael Hardiman and Faye Harrison. (Responsible Investing)(Cover Story)O& Hardiman, Michael Harrison, FayeVPJournal of Banking and Financial Services1443-6035June-July 2003, v117 i3, p4(3),&Moral Relativism and Moral Objectivity@:Harman, Gilbert Thomson, Judith Jarvis Schwarz, Stephen D.,%International Philosophical QuarterlyX371113-115 0019-03650*Mr 97 Blackwell : Oxford, 1996 Book-Review 1996PINew CEOs Pursue Their Own Self-Interests by Sacrificing Stakeholder Value*#Harrison, Jeffrey S. Fiet, James O.  Journal of Business Ethics193e301-308I 0167-4544e<6Short-term performance increases that are sometimes observed after CEO successions may be evidence of self-interested behavior. New CEOs may cut allocations to long-term investment areas, such as research and development (R&D), capital equipment and pension funds, in an effect to drive up short-term profits and secure their positions. However, such actions have unfavorable consequences for some stakeholders. This study provides evidence that both R&D and pension funding are reduced subsequent to a succession, even after accounting for industry trends. (edited)<6Chairman ; Ethics ; Self Interest; Stakeholder ; ValueAp II 99 English 1999PRKAnimal Experimentation: Pro and Con Arguments Using the Theory of EvolutionNordgren, Anders*$Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy5f1 23-31 1386-7423:4The theory of evolution has been used in arguments regarding animal experimentation. Two such arguments are analyzed, one against and one in favor. Each argument stresses the relevance of the theory of evolution to normative ethics but attempts explicitly to avoid the so-called naturalistic fallacy. According to the argument against animal experimentation, the theory of evolution 'undermines' the idea of a special human dignity and supports 'moral individualism'. The argument in favor of animal experimentation is based on evolutionary psychology. It states that humans, as all social animals, are speciesist by nature and stresses that this should be taken seriously in normative ethics. This does not mean that animal interests should not be considered, only that vital human interests may outweigh them. (edited):4Animal ; Ethics ; Evolution ; Experimentation ; Pain 2002 English 20026}IH\f_Reply to Spier's Response to "Discourse and Moral Responsibility in Biotechnical Communication"Jamieson, Dale$Science and Engineering Ethics62285-287 1353-3452^What this exchange between me and Professor Spier shows is that even those of us who agree about the most fundamental features of life (e.g., materialism, consequentialism, etc.) can still disagree about the policies that should flow from these commitments. I am skeptical about the benefits of agricultural biotechnology; he apparently is not. But the deeper issue with which we should both be concerned is the apparent inability of ethical discourse to affect this debate, except indirectly by its impact on stock prices and consumer behavior. If I am right about this, the disempowerment of ethical discourse in the face of rapid technological change is a very serious problem indeed. Sometimes in my darker moments I wonder whether we should tell our brightest and most highly motivated students who want to change the world that they should become investment bankers rather than scientists or philosophers.4D=Agriculture ; Biotechnology ; Communication ; Ethics Spier, RAp 2000 English 20001853837660 (hbk.)Jeucken, MarcelZSSustainable finance and banking : the financial sector and the future of the planet London Earthscan Publications Ltd 2001 xviii, 318.(2001002398 Marcel Jeucken. Rev. translation of: Duurzaam bankieren. Includes bibliographical references and index. Foreword / Foreword / 1. Introduction -- Pt. I. Sustainability: A General Introduction. 2. Environmental Consciousness and Sustainable Development. 3. Sustainability: The Challenges for Companies. 4. Sustainability: A Special Role for Banks -- Pt. II. Banking and Sustainability. 5. Sustainability, Markets and Banking Products. 6. Sustainability and Financing Risks. 7. Internal Environmental Care. 8. Organization and Communication about Sustainability -- Pt. III. In Reflection. 9. Sustainable Banking in Perspective: The Cases of 34 International Banks. 10. Sustainable Development: A Paradigm Shift. 11. Towards sustainable banking. App. I. Environmental Performances of Developed Countries -- App. II. Sectoral Changes in the Pursuit of Sustainability: A Dutch Scenario -- App. III. IFC Project Classification for Environmental Assessments -- App. IV. Example of an Environmental Risk Checklist -- App. V. The ICC Business Charter for Sustainable Development: Principles for Environmental Management -- App. VI. UNEP Statement by Financial Institutions on the Environment and Sustainable Development -- App. VII. List of Signatories to the UNEP Statement by Financial Institutions on the Environment and Sustainable Development -- App. VIII. Overview of Characteristics of Selected Banks -- App. IX. An Integral Score for Sustainable Banking -- App. X. Ecological Economics -- App. XI. Zero Growth and Other Solutions? -- App. XII. The Prisoner's Dilemma.& Sustainable development Finance.81QGU Nathan HC79.E5 J4813 2001 DUE: 11/02/05 17:00Behind the green doorMarcel JeuckenFinancial World Aug 2002 41-43yD>Although there is growing awareness by banks of the business case for sustainable development and the risks involved in pursuing anti-environmental policies, the majority remain inactive. Even in the US, where banks can be held legally responsible for pollution, 33% do not conduct environmental risk analyses. Environmental reporting remains a European phenomenon, while North American and Oceanian banks concentrate more on community issues. Out of 34 international banks studied, 60% say they have an environment policy, however, this can be as little as a few sentences.b\Environmental protection Social responsibility Sustainable development International bankingJohnsen, D. Bruce 2003:4Socially Responsible Investing: A Critical Appraisal Journal of Business Ethics433r219-222e 0167-45445on file4-Ethics Investment Social Responsibility Stock/This paper makes three important points regarding socially responsible investing. First, the current methodology involving SRI fund divestiture of the securities of firms that engage in socially irresponsible activity often results in unacceptable unintended consequences. Second, in many cases the proper methodology for SRI funds may be purposely to include the securities of such firms in the portfolio in an effort to internalize socially irresponsible interfirm spillovers. Finally, that SRI fund managers may be able to bond their performance by organizing as closed-end funds subject to takeover and liquidation if the stated socially responsible objectives are not met.Mr III 03 English.'Social Responsibility and the Utilities Jones, Alank Journal of Business Ethics34 3-4219-229 0167-4544tHAThis paper examines recent developments in U.K. utility regulation from a business ethics perspective. The regulatory framework that facilitated privatization of the utility companies has foundations based upon free market principles involving a transfer from regulation to competitive markets wherever possible. (edited){@9Ethics ; Responsibility ; Society ; Stakeholder ; Utility D 01 English 2001jm#:,dKing, Roger J. H.i 2001zVirtue and Community in Business Ethics: A Critical Assessment of Solomon's Aristotelian Approach to Social Responsibility"Journal of Social Philosophy324-487-4997 0047-2786iZSBusiness Ethics Community Ethics Responsibility Society Virtue Aristotle Solomon, R\Wint 01 Englishp(!Klaasen, Johann A. Gay, George R.a 200381Fiduciary Duty and Socially Responsible Investing\*$Philosophy in the Contemporary World101r 49-54 1077-1999-on file<6Duty Ethics Fiduciary Investing Responsibility SocietyInvestment advisers have fiduciary duties to their clients: in this essay, we address those duties. Many advisers refuse to help their clients with 'socially responsible' investment plans, for a variety of reasons, among which are fiduciary concerns. We argue that the reasons generally given not to pursue a religious, environmental, or social investment strategy are mistaken, and, most importantly, that an investment adviser's fiduciary duties may be met while providing such alternatives to clients. (edited)pSpr-Sum 03 Englishb\Voices from Roslin: The Creators of Dolly Discuss Science, Ethics, and Social ResponsibilityKlotzko, Arlene Judith.(Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics72121-140O 0963-1801@9Cloning ; Ethics ; Genetics ; Responsibility ; TechnologySpr 98 English 1998 A84435995Knoll, Michael S.!vpEthical screening in modern financial markets: the conflicting claims underlying socially responsible investment82Business Lawyer0007-6899Feb 2002, v57 i2, p681(47)0947277374 (pbk.)Ethical investment Marrickville, N.S.W.  Choice Books 1997 viii, 194*#Ross Knowles, editor. Bibliography.oNGInvestments Australia. Investments Moral and ethical aspects Australia.@ Knowles, Ross|vQGU GoldCoast HG5892 .E85 1997 In Library QGU Logan HG5892 .E85 1997 In Library QGU Nathan HG5892 .E85 1997 In LibraryThe Business Responsibility for Wealth Distribution in a Globalized Political-Economy Merging Moral Economics and Catholic Social Teaching("Kohls, John Christensen, Sandra L. Journal of Business Ethics353223-234o 0167-4544SJCThis paper asserts that businesses have a responsibility to consider the wealth distribution effects of their wealth-creating decisions. We use arguments from moral economics and Catholic social teaching to support this assertion, deriving decision principles that we apply to the Starbucks fair-trade coffee case. (edited)LFCatholicism ; Distribution ; Ethics ; Global ; Responsibility ; WealthF I 02 English 2002<6Ethical Investing: The Permissibility of Participation Kolers, Avery&Journal of Political Philosophy94 435-452 0963-8016"Ethical investing" is all the rage. But is it even possible? This article argues, cautiously, that it is. Investment pervades our economy, and participants share responsibility for corporate practices. Thus short of outright withdrawal, most people have little hope of avoiding responsibility for immoral practices. Hence, withdrawal seems to be required. This disturbing result is slightly mitigated, however, because shareholder activism can be a valuable reformative tool in deeply flawed systems. Through analogies with consumption and democratic political participation, the conclusions of this paper illuminate not only the ethics of investment but a more-general problem of responsibility in complex institutions.:4Ethics ; Investment ; Participation ; Responsibility D 01 English 20012+Hume, Bioethics, and Philosophy of Medicine0)Kopelman, Loretta M. McCullough, Laurence("Journal of Medicine and Philosophy244315-321 0360-5310jcThis is the first publication devoted to exploring the relation between the philosophy of David Hume and important topics in bioethics, medical ethics, and philosophy of medicine. Contributors discuss how Hume's work informs current debates, such as the moral standing of animals (Tom Beauchamp), the morality of suicide (Ray Frey), the justice of a universal health care system (Larry R. Churchill), the history of medical ethics through John Gregory (Lawrence McCullough), and reconciling demands of professionalism and its limited partiality, with the demands of a just health care system (Loretta Kopelman).("Bioethics ; Ethics ; Medicine Hume Ag 99 English 1999 @ G@HIKLMNWYZdj/4:;?}wzx0ko1l2r3 7ss/89zt:-rq;<=,>?@AB+{C)('D&E|F{G|HI}KL#m~~  M"OPQn SvTUVWXYZ[\p]^_a cxvughi jk tn/q31`0:zQ@Frost, Frederick A. 1995leThe Use of Stakeholder Analysis to Understand Ethical and Moral Issues in the Primary Resource Sector  Journal of Business Ethics148)653-661 0167-4544 paper on fileB7Lifesizing in an Era of Downsizing: An Ethical QuandaryMiller, Robert A. Journal of Business Ethics1715 1693-1700 0167-4544Corporate executives, at the behest of Wall Street, have embraced the heresy of upsizing short-term shareholder profits by downsizing the long-term work force. This restructuring of corporate America, which views the corporation as an investment organization rather than a social organization, has created an ethical quandary by removing from the equation a sense of larger-purpose. This paper proposes a new paradigm, "Lifesizing", to address the issues raised by this ethical quandary. (edited)>8Corporation ; Downsizing ; Ethics ; Profit ; Shareholder N 98 English 1998 A81596637 rkSustainability, socially responsible investment and the outlook of investment professionals in Australia. *<6Mills, Julie Cocklin, Chris Fayers, Chris Holmes, DougD=Greener Management International0966-9671Spring 2001, p31(14)Mollner, Terry 2005piWe Must Go Deeper, Not Cheaper, to Regain Leadership: The SRI Industry Has Done the Good it Set Out to DoDragonfly Media 2005 May  Filed under M&*$Hawken criticism of SRI Spirituality Defends SRI against Hawken critique. Argues aim of SRI was to create new asset class that proved investors didn't have to sacrifice financial returns when investing in companies that have certain positive features. Discusses spiritually responsible investment.d^Hives and Horseshoes, Mintzberg or MacIntyre: What Future for Corporate Social Responsibility? Moore, GeoffBusiness Ethics121 41-53 0962-8770"Who should control the corporation and for what ends?" Drawing on research evidence the paper demonstrates how corporations are simultaneously under pressure from society and responding to its concerns. The paper concludes that these current developments can at best ameliorate the situation, and that what is necessary is to rediscover the notion of corporate virtue, instead of putting virtue at the service of vice. (edited)b\Business ; Control ; Corporation ; Ethics ; Social Responsibility Macintyre, a; Mintzberg, H Ja 03 English 2003'.O`lAs}{Ll_O.' 5G] o/{6<@BBAABA>;5.y o\G5 > Rk/{AJOSUVUTVURMG@/zj R> 0538873566$Corporate financial accounting 6th Cincinnati, Ohio & South-Western College Publishing 19991 v. (various pagings)~w98018409 Carl S. Warren, James M. Reeve, and Philip E. Fess. Ch. 1. Introduction to Accounting and Business -- Ch. 2. Analyzing Transactions -- Ch. 3. The Matching Concept and the Adjusting Process -- Ch. 4. Completing the Accounting Cycle -- Ch. 5. Accounting for Merchandising Businesses -- Ch. 6. Accounting Systems, Internal Controls, and Cash -- Ch. 7. Receivables -- Ch. 8. Inventories -- Ch. 9. Fixed Assets and Intangible Assets -- Ch. 10. Current Liabilities -- Ch. 11. Corporations: Organization, Capital Stock Transactions, and Dividends -- Ch. 12. Corporations: Income and Taxes, Stockholders' Equity, and Investments in Stocks -- Ch. 13. Bonds Payable and Investments in Bonds -- Statement of Cash Flows -- Financial Statement Analysis -- Ch. 14. Introduction to Managerial Accounting and Job Order Cost Systems -- Ch. 15. Process Cost Systems -- Ch. 16. Cost Behavior and Cost-Volume-Profit Analysis -- Ch. 17. Profit Reporting for Management Analysis -- Ch. 18. Budgeting -- Ch. 19. Performance Evaluation Using Variances from Standard Costs -- Ch. 20. Performance Evaluation for Decentralized Operations -- Ch. 21. Differential Analysis and Product Pricing -- Ch. 22. Capital Investment Analysis -- Ch. 23. Cost Allocation and Activity-Based Costing -- Ch. 24. Cost Management for Just-in-Time Manufacturers -- App. A. Interest Tables -- App. B. Codes of Professional Ethics -- App. C. Alternative Methods of Recording Deferrals -- App. D. Special Journals and Subsidiary Ledgers -- App. E. Periodic Inventory Systems for Merchandising Businesses -- App. F. Foreign Currency Transactions -- App. G. Hershey Foods Corporation Annual Report. Corporate Financial Accounting, by Warren, Reeve, and Fess, incorporates innovations both in content and learning methods. This respected author team addresses the needs of both preparers and users of accounting information in an interesting and enlightening manner.("Accounting Corporations Accounting6/Warren, Carl S. Reeve, James M. Fess, Philip E.2+QGU GoldCoast HF5686.C7 W37 1999 In LibraryvXRIn Pursuit of Principle and Profit, Business Success through Social Responsibility&Reder, Alan Introcaso, David M. Journal of Business Ethics1616 1765-1766 0167-4544a4.D 97 Putnam-Penguin : London, 1994 Book-Review 1994 003025809X2,Investment analysis and portfolio management 6th3  Fort Worth  Dryden Press 2000 xxxii, 1242i$Dryden Press series in financePJ99074300 Frank K. Reilly, Keith C. Brown. Includes bibliographical references and indexes. Pt. 1. The Investment Background -- Pt. 2. Developments in Investment Theory -- Pt. 3. Valuation Principles and Practices -- Pt. 4. Analysis and Management of Bonds -- Pt. 5. Analysis of Common Stocks -- Pt. 6. Derivative Security Analysis -- Pt. 7. Investment Companies and Evaluating Portfolio Performance -- App. A. How to Become a Chartered Financial Analyst -- App. B. Code of Ethics and Standards of Professional Conduct -- App. C. Interest Tables -- App. D. Standard Normal Probabilities.>7Investments. Investment analysis. Portfolio management.& Reilly, Frank K. Brown, Keith C.yQGU GoldCoast HG4521 .R396 2000 In Library QGU Logan HG4521 .R396 2000 In Library QGU Nathan HG4521 .R396 2000 In LibrarylfStrengthening the United States' Database Protection Laws: Balancing Public Access and Private ControlResnik, David B.$Science and Engineering Ethics9`3 301-318 1353-3452This paper develops three arguments for increasing the strength of database protection under U.S. law. First, stronger protections would encourage private investment in database development, and private databases have many potential benefits for science and industry. Second, stronger protections would discourage extensive use of private licenses to protect databases and would allow for greater public control over database laws and policies. Third, stronger database protections in the U.S. would harmonize U.S. and E.U. laws and would thus enhance international trade, commerce, and research. The U.S. should therefore follow the European example and develop two tiers of protection for databases. (edited)B;American ; Copyright ; Database ; Ethics ; Private ; Public Jl 03 English 2003&n@| Hassett, Kevin 2004>8'Sin Screening' is Ineffective at Best, Harmful at Worst(!The Chronicle of Higher Educationl5038 B.24 28 Mayon file 0)effectiveness SRI efficient market theory6/Unlikely that SRI will lead to lower returns (unless diversification is affected) because of market efficiencies. Screening probably won't have any effect on the markets. Casinos and tobacco companies are priced on the basis of the profit that market participants wexpect them to earn. It is implusible that the investment policies of nonprofit orgnaisations would significantly change smaking and gambling behaviour or the profits of companies that meet those consumer demands. To the extent that funds are invested in equities, they need to be as boradly diversified as possible. While the Domini list is pretty broad, that is probably because the criteria are not very stringent. But suppose I'm wrong, and SRI really does the effect that its advocates intend. Then the sotry becomes even worse. Say that a wave of SRI takes over American's nonprofit institutions, and that enough other investors adopt the practice that they drive down the prices of 'sinful' companies. Those companies will then have a higher cash flow relative to their price, and as a result can be expected to outperform the market in the future. If only sinners buy those stockes, then sinners will be the investors getting the high returns. Now imagine that you are sitting on a board of an organisation that privides AIDS drugs to poor Africans. If you invest your endowment in SR companies, then you might be able to help a million sick patients next year. If you invest in irrespnsible companies and earn the higher return, then you could hlpe perhaps 1.1 million. Could anyone really aruge that it is ethical to leave 100,000 individuals without treatment because of SRI? While the example is an extreme one, the point is that anything that diminishes the quantity or reliability of cahs available to nonprofit organisations is likely to have signficant human costs. Don't managers then have a responsiblity to maximise the return on their endowments. There are 2 possibilities: either SRI has no effect, in which case it is just window dressing, or it does have an effect, in which case it's an awful idea. ,&Hawken, Paul Natural Capital Institute 2004$Socially Responsible Investing  California Natural Capital InstituteFOctoberton filea$SRI Disclosure Finance ethicstmStrong critique of current approaches to SRI, e.g. makeup of portfolios, financial goals, lack of disclosure.r<6http://www.naturalcapital.org/images/NCI_SRI_10-04.pdf Hawken, Paul 2005(!The Truth About Ethical Investingl AlterNet 2005 Maylon file,ethical funds ethicsF?critique of ethical funds - lack of disclosure, lack of rigour.0*www.alternet.org/module/printversion/21888*$Hawley, James P. Williams, Andrew T. 2002>7Can Universal Owners Be Socially Responsible Investors?e  Camejo, PetereZSThe SRI Advantage : Why Socially Responsible Investing Has Outperformed Financially New Society Publishers 151-71 filed under H,%Universal owners Fiduciary engagementClaim that corporate capitalism is entering a 3rd phase - fiduciary capitalism. Ownership is concentrated in the hands of fiduciary insititutions - pension and mutual funds. Convergence emerging between many of the overall aims of SRI and the imperatives of universal owners. the universal owner captures positive externalities by firms and is harmed by negative externalities because it is affected by the performance of the economy as a whole. They occupy a quasi-public policy position. Reform efforts ahve focused on firm-by-firm corporate governance issues, but they need to complement it with an analysis of the impact that externalities might have on the performance of their portfolios as a whole.*$Hawley, James P. Williams, Andrew T. 2003jdShifting Ground: Emerging Global Corporate Governance Standards and the Rise of Fiduciary CapitalismNovemberPIA paper presented at the Global Standards Conference University of Oxford,&Fiduciary capital Corporate governanceThis paper examines the long-term interests that large institutional owners (e.g. CalPERS, Hermes, USS) have in the development of global corporate governance standards, especially as governance standards increasingly become intertwined with other standards and regime parameters involved in the globalization debates. It argues that institutional owners have a unique perspective and voice to contribute to the formulation of global standards in a variety of areas based on their long-term financial interests. This conclusion is supported by an analytic review of the current state of global corporate governance, including multilateral initiatives (e.g. OECD, World Bank); an analysis of significant institutional investors, the role of various rating agencies (e.g. Fitch, Moodys), the International Corporate Governance Network and the growing role of various NGOs (e.g. CERES, Carbon Disclosure Project) in relation to corporate governance. Finally, the paper examines the strengths and limitations of the authors previously developed arguments about institutional owners as universal owners and the fiduciary capitalism perspective in the context of emerging global corporate governance standards as modified by varying national/regional forms of ownershiphttp://www.stmarys-ca.edu/academics/undergraduate/programs_by_school/school_of_economics_and_business_administration/centers/fidcap/articles/Global_Corporate_Standards_Nov_2003.pdf*$Hawley, James P. Williams, Andrew T. 200560Universal Owners, Fiduciary Duty and Materiality0.618...5a4aJanuaryrFiled under U (UNEP FI)t:3advocacy Universal owners Institutional investmentsPIwww.epa.vic.gov.au/Programs/UNEP/docs/UNEP_FI_Newsletter_January_2005.pdf Heinze, Davidl 1999~Relations Among Corporate Social Responsibility, Financial Soundness, and Investment Value in 22 Manufacturing Industry GroupsEthics and Behaviorl9040331-347 1050-8422on file2.(Corporation Ethics Profit ResponsibilityDoes a relation exist between ethics and profits? This article revisits this age-old question with interesting findings. The latest "Fortune" "America's Most Admired Companies" database is used and arranged into 22 manufacturing industry groups. "Fortune" criteria of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), Financial Soundness (FS), and Investment Value (IV) are relationally analyzed. This article reports which manufacturing industry groups display a close relation between a surrogate measure of ethics (CSR) and profits (FS/IV) and which industries do not. The main finding is that the strength of the relation between CSR (ethics) and profits varies considerably from one manufacturing industry to another. (edited) 1999 English A125797446 Hely, SusanFund with a consciencePersonal Investor Melbourne, Vic.@""Lewis, Alan Mackenzie, Craig 2000>8Support for INvestor Activism among UK Ethical Investors Journal of Business Ethics24 215-22abstract on file.'shareholder activism Consumer attitudes Lewis, Alant 2001hbA focus group study of the motivation to invest: 'ethical/green' and 'ordinary' investors compared$The Journal of Socio-Economics30 331-41abstract on file"Motivation ethical investors Lewis, Alan 2001NHGood Money, Bad Money: The Case of Socially Responsible Investment in UK World Futuresu564e 3995 A79477160WLewis, Michael 2004 The Irresponsible InvestorNew York Times Magazinen 68-71  6 Juneon file*$SRI business schools Business EthicsGoogle float - number 1 rule 'don't be evil'. Founders believe that investors require corporate executives to sell their souls. 1% of their profits to go to the Google Foundation. Investors are given only 1/10 of a vote, while employees with shares will have full voting rights. Looks at how CSR is taught in a business school - not goodness for goodness sake but because it pays. "At some point this feeling good stuff burns out". But if goodness for goodness' sake has no place in public corproations, is it any wonder that the people who work for them exhibit less-than-ideal ethical standards? For that matter, is it surprising, given their necessarily relentless selfishness, that they occuastionally forget exactly for whom they are meant to act selfishly? The pressure applied to people who run public corporations lamost requires them to forget how to be good. Contrast this with Birkenstock USA.{Animal Research, Non-Vegetarianism, and the Moral Status of Animals--Understanding the Impasse of the Animal Rights Problem Li, Hon Lam("Journal of Medicine and Philosophy275 589-615~ 0360-5310i~I offer some reasons for the theory that, compared with human beings, nonhuman animals have some but lesser intrinsic value. On the basis of this theory, I first argue that we do not know how to compare an animal's claim to be free from a more serious type of harm and a human's claim to be free from some lesser type of harm. Second, I explain why utilitarianism is unhelpful in making such comparison. Third, in the case where some animals can be sacrificed for saving a larger number of humans, it is crucial to ask whether animals have the right to life, and I argue that this question is more perplexing than we might think. (edited)JCAnimal Rights; Research ; Social Philosophy; Status ; Vegetarianism O 02 English 2002("0471293059 (cloth acid-free paper)Liaw, K. Thomas("The business of investment banking New York J. Wiley 1999ix, 33798011641 K. Thomas Liaw. Includes bibliographical references and index. Ch. 1. Investment Banking in Global Capital Markets -- Ch. 2. Venture Capital Markets -- Ch. 3. Mergers and Acquisitions -- Ch. 4. Stock Underwriting -- Ch. 5. Underwriting Fixed-Income Securities -- Ch. 6. Asset Securitization -- Ch. 7. Foreign Listing on Wall Street -- Ch. 8. Euromarkets and European Markets -- Ch. 9. Japanese Securities Markets -- Ch. 10. Emerging Markets -- Ch. 11. Trading and Trading Techniques -- Ch. 12. Repurchase Transactions -- Ch. 13. Financial Engineering -- Ch. 14. Money Management -- Ch. 15. Clearing and Settlement -- Ch. 16. Securities Regulation and Ethics -- Ch. 17. Investment Banking Trends and Section 20 -- Glossary: Common Capital Market Terms."The Business of Investment Banking is a complete guide to the major banking activities in today's global marketplace. This convenient, one-volume reference identifies and analyzes key trends worldwide, allowing banking and finance professionals to effectively manage deals and incorporate trends into operations. In The Business of Investment Banking, Professor K. Thomas Liaw goes beyond traditional banking topics and includes extensive coverage of rarely discussed subjects that are integral to investment banking, such as emerging markets, proprietary trading, repurchase transactions, operations, money management, and how foreign firms list on Wall Street."--BOOK JACKET.Investment banking.XQQGU GoldCoast HG4534 .L528 1999 In Library QGU Logan HG4534 .L528 1999 In Library ^j,&Paul Webley Alan Lewis Craig Mackenzie 2001B8Business and Society0007-6503March 2001, v40 i1, p112(6) Alan Strudleru 2003<5On socially responsible investing: A critical commentn&Journal of Business Ethics; JBE,433f 215-17 Mard01674544 paper on filerlStudies Social responsibility Market strategy Tobacco Alcohol Cigarette industry Business ethics InvestmentsThis paper argues, against Mark Schwartz, that it is not inherently wrong to sell tobacco, but that tobacco sales may nonetheless be morally problematic because of the marketing context in which such sales tend to occur; screens against tobacco firms may therefore be justified. It further suggests that it is problematic marketing practices that form the best basis for raising moral doubts about the alcohol, defense, and gaming industries, and that screens against these industries may be justified.WORD COUNT: 140960Sullivan, Rory McDonald, Cherrie McGuire, Nicola 200160Evaluating Corporate Performance on Human RightsEthical Investment 2001h Brisbaneon fileaHuman Rights SRI SustainAbility Mistral 2004>7Values for Money: Reviewing the Quality of SRI Researchh SustainAbility Mistra0on file0 SRI research A123611395Swift, Brendan$BT loses ARF, tweaks SRI fundB81Abuse ; Ethics ; Finance ; Investment ; Violation D 96 English 1996>8Vitell, Scott J. Paolillo, Joseph G. P. Thomas, James L. 2003`ZThe Perceived Role of Ethics and Social Responsibility: A Study of Marketing Professionals Business Ethics Quarterly-131- 63-86. 1052-150X.on fileB;Business Corporation Ethics Marketing Social ResponsibilityThis study examined the effect of various antecedent variables on marketers' perceptions of the role of ethics and social responsibility in the overall success of the firm. Variables examined included Hofstede's cultural dimensions (i.e., power distance, uncertainty avoidance, individualism, masculinity, and Confucian dynamism), as well as corporate ethical values and enforcement of an ethics code. Additionally, individual variables, such as ethical idealism and relativism, were included. (edited) Ja 03 Englishrjm#:,(!Klaasen, Johann A. Gay, George R.a 200381Fiduciary Duty and Socially Responsible Investing\*$Philosophy in the Contemporary World101r 49-54 1077-1999-on file<6Duty Ethics Fiduciary Investing Responsibility SocietyInvestment advisers have fiduciary duties to their clients: in this essay, we address those duties. Many advisers refuse to help their clients with 'socially responsible' investment plans, for a variety of reasons, among which are fiduciary concerns. We argue that the reasons generally given not to pursue a religious, environmental, or social investment strategy are mistaken, and, most importantly, that an investment adviser's fiduciary duties may be met while providing such alternatives to clients. (edited)pSpr-Sum 03 Englishb\Voices from Roslin: The Creators of Dolly Discuss Science, Ethics, and Social ResponsibilityKlotzko, Arlene Judith.(Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics72121-140O 0963-1801@9Cloning ; Ethics ; Genetics ; Responsibility ; TechnologySpr 98 English 1998 A84435995Knoll, Michael S.!vpEthical screening in modern financial markets: the conflicting claims underlying socially responsible investment82Business Lawyer0007-6899Feb 2002, v57 i2, p681(47)0947277374 (pbk.)Ethical investment Marrickville, N.S.W.  Choice Books 1997 viii, 194*#Ross Knowles, editor. Bibliography.oNGInvestments Australia. Investments Moral and ethical aspects Australia.@ Knowles, Ross|vQGU GoldCoast HG5892 .E85 1997 In Library QGU Logan HG5892 .E85 1997 In Library QGU Nathan HG5892 .E85 1997 In LibraryThe Business Responsibility for Wealth Distribution in a Globalized Political-Economy Merging Moral Economics and Catholic Social Teaching("Kohls, John Christensen, Sandra L. Journal of Business Ethics353223-234o 0167-4544SJCThis paper asserts that businesses have a responsibility to consider the wealth distribution effects of their wealth-creating decisions. We use arguments from moral economics and Catholic social teaching to support this assertion, deriving decision principles that we apply to the Starbucks fair-trade coffee case. (edited)LFCatholicism ; Distribution ; Ethics ; Global ; Responsibility ; WealthF I 02 English 2002<6Ethical Investing: The Permissibility of Participation Kolers, Avery&Journal of Political Philosophy94 435-452 0963-8016"Ethical investing" is all the rage. But is it even possible? This article argues, cautiously, that it is. Investment pervades our economy, and participants share responsibility for corporate practices. Thus short of outright withdrawal, most people have little hope of avoiding responsibility for immoral practices. Hence, withdrawal seems to be required. This disturbing result is slightly mitigated, however, because shareholder activism can be a valuable reformative tool in deeply flawed systems. Through analogies with consumption and democratic political participation, the conclusions of this paper illuminate not only the ethics of investment but a more-general problem of responsibility in complex institutions.:4Ethics ; Investment ; Participation ; Responsibility D 01 English 20012+Hume, Bioethics, and Philosophy of Medicine0)Kopelman, Loretta M. McCullough, Laurence("Journal of Medicine and Philosophy244315-321 0360-5310jcThis is the first publication devoted to exploring the relation between the philosophy of David Hume and important topics in bioethics, medical ethics, and philosophy of medicine. Contributors discuss how Hume's work informs current debates, such as the moral standing of animals (Tom Beauchamp), the morality of suicide (Ray Frey), the justice of a universal health care system (Larry R. Churchill), the history of medical ethics through John Gregory (Lawrence McCullough), and reconciling demands of professionalism and its limited partiality, with the demands of a just health care system (Loretta Kopelman).("Bioethics ; Ethics ; Medicine Hume Ag 99 English 1999C.(Ethical Behaviour and Securities TradingGoslings, Jan H. W.Business Ethics63147-152 0962-8770*#"Economic man does not ask himself ethical questions." Yet securities trading inevitably raises many ethical issues, and ethical behavior may be restricting and costly. Drawing on his economics background and his executive experience in the insurance and pension investment industry, as well as supervisory positions on the European Option Exchange, Dr. Goslings analyzes the securities markets and their structure, and explores their moral strengths and weaknesses in The Netherlands and elsewhere, before offering some practical recommendations.@9Behavior ; Business Ethics; Ethics ; Investment ; Trading Jl 97 English 1997000768134.In the name of corporate social responsibilityW M GreenfieldBusiness HorizonsJan/Feb\ 2004 19-28471(!Corporate social responsibility, or CRS, is the new buzzword in these days of company implosions and rampant executive "perp" walks. CSR, however, will never replace real people behaving in ethical and responsible ways. In fact, it is counterproductive in many ways to the manner in which societies are supposed to operate. In short, before we can even get to the question of CSR, we need to resolve a number of major issues that may well make it moot. The answers come down to requiring people to do what they are already required by law to do.LFUnited States; US Social responsibility Business ethics Commercial law 013142263481International business : a managerial perspective 4thr Upper Saddle River, NJ Pearson Prentice Halla 2005 xxxiii, 6511vo2003062233 Ricky W. Griffin, Michael W. Pustay. Includes 1 passcode card for online content. Includes bibliographical references (p. 611-624) and indexes. Pt. 1. The World's Marketplaces -- Ch. 1. An Overview of International Business -- Ch. 2. Global Marketplaces and Business Centers -- Ch. 3. Legal, Technological, and Political Forces -- Ch. 4. The Role of Culture -- Ch. 5. Ethics and Social Responsibility in International Business -- Pt. 2. The International Environment -- Ch. 6. International Trade and Investment Theory -- Ch. 7. The International Monetary System and the Balance of Payments -- Ch. 8. Foreign Exchange and International Financial Markets -- Ch. 9. Formulation of National Trade Policies -- Ch. 10. International Cooperation Among Nations -- Pt. 3. Managing International Business -- Ch. 11. International Strategic Management -- Ch. 12. Strategies for Analyzing and Entering Foreign Markets -- Ch. 13. International Strategic Alliances -- Ch. 14. International Organization Design and Control -- Ch. 15. Leadership and Employee Behavior in International Business -- Pt. 4. Managing International Business Operations -- Ch. 16. International Marketing -- Ch. 17. International Operations Management -- Ch. 18. International Financial Management -- Ch. 19. International Accounting and Taxation -- Ch. 20. International Human Resource Management and Labor Relations.o4.International business enterprises Management.*$Griffin, Ricky W. Pustay, Michael W.b\QGU GoldCoast HD62.4 .G74 2005 DUE: 02/01/05 17:00 QGU Logan On Order QGU MtGravatt On OrderPB;Grant Michelson Nick Wailes Sandra van der Laan Geoff Frost 20040)Ethical Investment Processes and OutcomesC&Journal of Business Ethics; JBEt521e 1-10 Jun01674544on fileHAStudies Business ethics Corporate responsibility Social investingThere is a growing body of literature on ethical or socially responsible investment across a range of disciplines. This paper highlights the key themes in the field and identifies some of the major theoretical and practical challenges facing both scholars and practitioners. One of these challenges is understanding better the complexity of the relationship between such investment practices and corporate behaviour. Noting that ethical investment is seldom characterised by agreement about what it actully constitutes, and that much of the extant research focuses on a narrow set of issues, the paper argues that there are benefits associated with examining ethical investment as a process. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]WORD COUNT: 6475>7Lifesizing in an Era of Downsizing: An Ethical QuandaryMiller, Robert A. Journal of Business Ethics1715 1693-1700 0167-4544Corporate executives, at the behest of Wall Street, have embraced the heresy of upsizing short-term shareholder profits by downsizing the long-term work force. This restructuring of corporate America, which views the corporation as an investment organization rather than a social organization, has created an ethical quandary by removing from the equation a sense of larger-purpose. This paper proposes a new paradigm, "Lifesizing", to address the issues raised by this ethical quandary. (edited)>8Corporation ; Downsizing ; Ethics ; Profit ; Shareholder N 98 English 1998 A81596637 rkSustainability, socially responsible investment and the outlook of investment professionals in Australia. *<6Mills, Julie Cocklin, Chris Fayers, Chris Holmes, DougD=Greener Management International0966-9671Spring 2001, p31(14)Mollner, Terry 2005piWe Must Go Deeper, Not Cheaper, to Regain Leadership: The SRI Industry Has Done the Good it Set Out to DoDragonfly Media 2005 May  Filed under M&*$Hawken criticism of SRI Spirituality Defends SRI against Hawken critique. Argues aim of SRI was to create new asset class that proved investors didn't have to sacrifice financial returns when investing in companies that have certain positive features. Discusses spiritually responsible investment. Monks, Roberth 2002hbOwnership and Sustainability: The Case for Shareholder Activism to Promote Corporate ResponsiblityMultinational Monitor223 7-8u34July/Aug interview filed under MNGengagement shareholder activism finance culture corporate relationshipssproposes that the pension is the shareholder for whom the corporation ought to be run and the frame of reference ought to be 20 years - the time until the pensioner retires. Brightline - computer model - a ruthless company does well int he short term, but compliant companies do better int eh long term. If govtnerment through pension funds becmes the significant or controlloing owner of businesses, that looks like backdoor socialism. Problem is trustees of funds are usually big financial conglomerates - business relationships with the company whos stock they own - want to get additional business from those companies, so won't make the managements apprehensive or hostile - could be illegal.d^Hives and Horseshoes, Mintzberg or MacIntyre: What Future for Corporate Social Responsibility? Moore, GeoffBusiness Ethics121 41-53 0962-8770"Who should control the corporation and for what ends?" Drawing on research evidence the paper demonstrates how corporations are simultaneously under pressure from society and responding to its concerns. The paper concludes that these current developments can at best ameliorate the situation, and that what is necessary is to rediscover the notion of corporate virtue, instead of putting virtue at the service of vice. (edited)b\Business ; Control ; Corporation ; Ethics ; Social Responsibility Macintyre, a; Mintzberg, H Ja 03 English 2003Approach to Pricing -- Ch. 7. Cost Management -- Ch. 8. The Cost-Volume-Profit Approach to Decisions -- Ch. 9. Operations Budgeting -- Ch. 10. Statement of Cash Flows and Working Capital Analysis -- Ch. 11. Cash Management -- Ch. 12. Capital Budgeting and the Investment Decision -- Ch. 13. Feasibility Studies - An Introduction -- Ch. 14. Financial Goals and Information Systems -- App. Computers in Hospitality Management."This text offers valuable preparation for the increasingly complex and competitive hospitality industry with hands-on coverage of computer applications and ethics situations focused on honing decision-making skills. Packed with accurate up-to-date case studies, exercises, and problems, this Eighth Edition offers alternative solutions to provide a variety of problem-solving approaches."--BOOK JACKET.d]Hotels Accounting. Taverns (Inns) Accounting. Food service Accounting. Managerial accounting.("Jagels, Martin Coltman, Michael M.2,QGU GoldCoast HF5686.H75 C53 2004 In Library Q MPIo 200160The Mining Industry - A Tricky Challenge for SRIEthical Investment 2001g BrisbaneFebruaryon filen Mining SRIThe View from Nowhere1 Nagel, Thomas Oxford Univ Pr Ny 1986vpAppearance ; Epistemology ; Ethics ; Knowledge ; Metaphysics ; Objectivity ; Realism ; Scepticism ; SubjectivityENGLISH^Nair, Chandran 20054.What Truly Open Companies Should be DisclosingFinancial TimesO London6r#Letters to the Editorw 4 June Filed under Nn Disclosure 0070461945D>Global business : contemporary issues, problems and challenges New York  McGraw-Hilll 1996 ix, 484, [39] . '[edited by] James P. Neelankavil, Yong Zhang. Sect. 1. Globalization of Business. 1. The Globalization of Markets / 2. Globalization, Regionalization and World Trade / 3. Ford: Alex Trotman's Daring Global Strategy / Sect. 2. Trade Theories and Issues. 4. 'New' Theories of International Trade / 5. Flat Earth Economics: Is There a New International Trade Paradigm? / 6. What Do Undergrads Need to Know About Trade? / 7. Making the Practical Case for Freer Trade / Sect. 3. Exchange Rate, International Financial Market, and Foreign Direct Investment. 8. U.S. Exchange Rate Policy: Bretton Woods to Present / 9. Hot Money / 10. Global Financial Markets in 2020 / 11. Borderless Finance: Fuel for Growth / 12. Foreign Direct Investment: Gift Horse or Trojan Horse? / Sect. 4. Regional Integration and Emerging Markets. 13. How NAFTA Will Help America / 14. Mercosur Lurches Forward / 15. 'Fortress Europe,' Will the EU Isolate Itself from North America and Asia? / 16. What Price Regional Integration? / 17. Why Emerging Markets? / 18. The Big Rise / Sect. 5. Culture and Business Customs. 19. The Silent Language in Overseas Business / 20. How to Negotiate European-Style / 21. The Influence of Japanese Culture on Business Relationships and Negotiations / 22. Doing Business in Korea and Taiwan: Cultural and Marketing Hints / Sect. 6. Economic and Political Environment. 23. The Triple Revolution / 24. The Global Economy: Who Gets Hurt / 25. Privatization in Eastern Europe: Is the State Withering Away? / 26. Forced Withdrawal from a Country Market: Managing Political Risk / 27. What Executives Should Know About Political Risk / Sect. 7. Mode of Entry, Production, and Sourcing Strategies. 28. The Export Myopia of U.S. Multinationals / 29. Strategic Alliances and Joint Ventures: Making Them Work / 30. Lean, Mean, and Mobile / 31. A Guide to Global Sourcing / 32. Global Make-or-Buy Decisions / Sect. 8. International Management and Marketing. 33. Tearing Up Today's Organization Chart / 34. Matsushita Shows How to Go Global / 35. Executive Insights: The 10-Step Road Map to Success in Foreign Markets / 36. Teens, The Most Global Market of All / 37. Industrial Trade Shows Abroad / Sect. 9. Financial and Accounting Strategies. 38. Formulating Corporate Foreign Exchange Strategy and Policy / 39. Identifying Foreign Exchange Risks in International Trade / 40. How to Build a Tax Shelter / 41. The Changing World of International Accounting and Auditing / 42. Wake-up Call to American Business: International Accounting Standards are on the Way / Sect. 10. Human Resource Management and Ethical Issues. 43. Long-Term Human Resource Development in Multinational Organizations / 44. Companies Use Cross-Cultural Training to Help Their Employees Adjust Abroad / 45. A Strategic Model for Multinational Corporation Social Responsibility in the ThirdGlobalization. International business enterprises International economic integration International economic relations Free trade(!Neelankavil, James P. Zhang, Yong.(QGU Nathan HF1418.5 .G46 1996 In LibrarybV.010795545:3The corporate challenges of sustainable developmentPratima Bansal*#The Academy of Management Executive May 2002122-131162While evidence pointing to environmental, social-equity, and economic threats mounts, few US firms have embraced the principles of sustainable development. This reticence is illustrated through an analysis of the adoption of ISO 14001, an international environmental-management system intended to advance the sustainable-development agenda in organizations. Interviewed managers said they resisted the standard because the benefits of ISO 14001 did not outweigh the costs and because in-house environmental systems served the same purpose. While part of this reticence can be attributed to the standard itself, it is also partly due to the nature of the issue of sustainable development. It is a societal issue to which most firms do not know how to respond. To bridge this divide, sustainable development must become more institutionalized in the regulations, norms, and mindsets of Americans. By translating the general principle of sustainable development into business practices, by developing better measures of sustainable development, and by empowering and engaging employees, firms are more likely to embrace sustainable development so that it permeates all organizational activities.haUnited States; US Sustainable development Environmental management Standards Corporate managementBarbut, Moniquee 2005*$UN Responsible Investment Initiative0.618...5{2lJanuaryaFiled under U (UNEP FI)}0)UNEP FI responsible investment initiative&PIwww.epa.vic.gov.au/Programs/UNEP/docs/UNEP_FI_Newsletter_January_2005.pdf Baue, William 2005TNStudents and States Seek to End Genocide in Sudan Through Divestment CampaignsSocial Funds?? 1 June 2005 Filed under Bn0)divestment campaign Universities ActivismPJcampaigns to get universities to divest from corporates involved in Dafur. Baue, William 2005biLFThe Ghost of a Shareholder Resolution Haunts ExxonMobil Annual MeetingSocialFunds.com5 SocialFunds.com= 2005 June Filed under B"Shareholder resolutions SEC82SEC lets Exxon Mobil omit a shareholder resolution:3www.socialfunds.com/news/print.cgi?sfArticleId=1717; Baue, William 2005caNHSustainable Asset Management Signs On to Eurosif Transparency GuidelinesSocialFunds.com& SocialFunds.comt 2005 June Filed under B& Disclosure Europe climate change>7Discusses SAM: disclosure & climate change commitments.:3www.socialfunds.com/news/print.cgi?sfArticleId=1721 Baue, Williami 2005ds\VAs HIV/AIDS Migrates Beyond Africa to Other Emerging Markets, So Too Do Business RisksSocialFunds.com SocialFunds.com 2005 June Filed under BHIV/AIDS Researcheens and 3 combinations of screens reveals little impact. To the extent that any impacts are observed, the market appears to reward good environment performance, charitable giving, and an absence of nuclear and defense work, and it appears to penalize firms that provide family-related benefits, such as parental leave, job sharing, and dependent care assistance.US Social responsibility Social investing Portfolio performance Mathematical models Investment policy Ethics Cost analysis Comparative studiesoB82Broadhurst, Dominic Watson, Janette Marshall, Jane 2003TNEthical and Socially Responsible Investment: A Reference Guide for Researchers MunchenH K. G. Saur Verlag GmbHyBook offers an evaluative guide to sources of SRI for companies or organisations. Definition: by independent financial advisers Holden Meehan - it "involves considering the ethical, social and environmental performance of companies selected for investment in addition to their financial performance." (ix) Petra Molthan - Introduction. History: July 2000 UK government issued new regulations requiring pension funds to declare "the extentto which environmental, social or ethical considerations are taken into account in the selection, retention and realisation of investments". (xi) Outlines 5 phases of SRI. 1. Religious roots of SRI: Quakers - 18th century - slave trade. 'sin stocks' - whole congregations - gambling, alcohol, prostitution, tobacco. UK - religious ideas motivated Victorians to include issues such as temperance and fair employment conditions in investment decisions. 1920 Methodist church used negative screening (gambling, alcohol) to invest in stock market. (xii) Quaker movement followed - excluding companies producing weapons. 1973 - Church Investors Group founded in UK - enabled exchange of views and information between investors working for different denominations. (xiii) [Current influence of religion in SRI?] 2. Forerunners: SRI movement took off in 1970 - first shareholder resolutions filed against companies working or investing under apartheid regime in South Africa. By 1980s billions of dollars divested from South African related companies, e.g Mobil, Goodyear, Johnson & Johnson. US government banned new investments. Early 1970s, 2 investment managers in New York and Boston took lead to manage portfolios with social criteria. In 1971, first mutual fund in US, the Pax World Club, was created by a group of Methodist clergy - aimed especially towards investors who did not want to profit from Vietnam war. (xiii) 3. Institutionalisation of SRI: aftermath of Vietnam War, peace movement, civil rights and anti-nuclear and environmental pressure groups all contributed to rising recognition of SRI. By 1984, total assets of $40 billion were socially screened (citing Shapiro 1992). In 1981 American Social Investment Forum was formed as a professional body for individuals and institutions involved in SRI. 1991 UK Social Investment Forum was founded. 1983 in UK the Ethical Investment Research Service - act as common source on companies' activities. 1984 Friends Provident launched first UK based unit trust, the Stewardship Fund. 1984-1990 >20 SRI alternatives were started in UK (citing Miller 1991). (xiii) 1984 - first UK ethical trust launched, 'informed City observers estimated the potential market for SRI in the UK around 2 million pounds.(xxiii) (By end 2000, was about 2000 times the original estimate) 4. Rise of 'dark green' funds: 1988 lunch of Merlin Ecology Fund (now Jupiter Ecology Fund). Followed by others. Major step in development of environmental investing was introduction of Valdez Principles in 1989 - named after Exxon Valdez oil spill, authored by Coalition for Environmentally Responsible Economies - establish standards and procedures for evaluating te environmental performance of companies. (xiv) 5. SRI goes mainstream: first social index created - Domini 400 Social Index - in early 1990s. Ethical banking highly encouraged in 1992 when The Co-operative Bank introduced its successful ethical policy. Co-operative Insurance Society - first financial services organisaiton in the UK that adopted an ethical policy for all its funds - Responsible Shareholding Scheme. July 2000 law requiring declaration by pension funds about whether or not they aim to develop policies on social and/or environmental issues. UK Social Investment Forum survey published in Oct 2000 found that 59% of largest pension funds, representing >230 billion pounds of assets had incorporated social responsibility issues into investment strategies (quoting Shepherd 2001). (xiv). US about 230 mutual funds following SRI strategies. /ruse if sicuak ubdexes as ciybteroarts ti traditional exclusively financial indices. 1999 Down Jones Sustainability Group Indexes. 2001 FTSE$GOOD index - marks a further move of SRI into mainstream investment. (xv) Strategies: A lot of confusion about what differentiates ethical investment strategies. Distinguish between different terms according to whether they describe a goal or method for the investment strategy. (xv) Goals: an ethical investment strategy has a certain purpose, e.g. encourage companies to improve social performance. Environmental performance - e.g. because of the connection between environmental and financial performance or environmental performance as an independent objective in its own right. (xvii) Best in class: If everyone else is the sector is on very low base, the best in class might be very basic in its approaches, but offers incentives for innovation Best in absolute terms: investment strategy is led by certain principles according to which companies are screened and/or chosen for engagement. (xviii) Involvement, Engagement, Responsible shareholding. (xix) Selection, Screening. Screening funds (different approaches: (a) benchmark approach - based on an index, (b) exclusive-active approach - include only companies that have a triple positive evaluation or produce certain environment-friendly products, (c) integrated-active approach - positive financial analysis followed by positive environmental and social performance positive analysis. (xxi)\h[ZMark S Schwartzp 2003(!The "ethics" of ethical investing\&Journal of Business Ethics; JBEi433p 195 Mar01674544on fileD=Studies Ethics Social responsibility Mutual funds Investments|vThere appears to be an implicit assumption by those connected with the ethical investment movement (e.g., ethical investment firms, individual investors, social investment organizations, academia, and the media), that ethical investment is in fact ethical. This paper will attempt to challenge the notion that the ethical mutual fund industry, as currently taking place, is acting in an ethical manner. Ethical issues such as the transparency of the funds and advertising are discussed. Ethical mutual fund screens such as tobacco, alcohol, gambling, and the military are preliminarily examined to better determine whether they can actually be defined as "ethical" screens as opposed to merely social, political, or religious screens. A code of ethics for ethical investment is constructed by which ethical mutual fund firms can be audited for ethical compliance. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]WORD COUNT: 11488s1052150X>7Corporate Social Responsiblity: A Three-Domain Approach& Mark S Schwartz Archie B Carroll Business Ethics Quarterly Octt 2003503-530134rlIdentified and discussed are 3 issues with respect to Archie Carroll's model of corporate social responsibility (CSR). They are items upon which a proposed 3-domain model proposes changes. The 3 issues include: 1. the use of a pyramid to depict the relationships among the 4 components of the model, 2. the role of philanthropy as a separate component in the model, and 3. the incomplete theoretical development of the economic, legal, and ethical domains. A major feature of the 3-domain model is the depiction of economic, legal, and ethical domains of responsibility in a Venn diagram which highlights the overlapping nature of the domains and the resultant creation of 7 categories in which CSR may be conceptualized, analyzed, and illustrated. The model is proposed as an alternative means of describing CSR activity and orientations which pervade the business community.VPUnited States; US Social responsibility Models Business ethics Management theory Scott, Mike 2005$Project Finance Sparks ChangerFinancial Times21 Marchon file& equator principles finance banksRKRational Fools: A Critique of the Behavioral Foundations of Economic Theory{Sen, Amartya K.$Philosophy and Public Affairs6317-344 0048-3915Behavior ; Commitment ; Contract ; Economics ; Ethics ; Morality ; Norm ; Preference ; Rationality ; Social Phil; Utility ; War$SUM 77 ENGLISH JOURNAL-ARTICLE 1977)000H @(N,,)//<<<00>'!!8 HBB;;;===&3 ,-2FPPAA454(EGJ)6 6:47H,#6:4": :&$#AP<.'.P(=#P#P:N/4 NNN,NB8'=< 748.}$?;*:4/jxdZYWNxML KpIHt@z A121534585&SRI growth offers opportunitiesBEnergy & Environmental Management1460-7530Nov-Dec 2003, p18(2) A109127830ZSFinancial Services: Socially-Responsible Investment Market Reaches Euro 336 Billion0*European Report1021-4267Oct 22, 2003, p343 A1058526266/Credit Lyonnais Asset Management. (Market News)0*Euroweek0952-7036July 11, 2003 i811, p8(1) A88575417|UIA seeks guarantee on SRI performance with 90m [pounds sterling] mandate for Morley Fund Management. (Fund Management News),%Euroweek0952-7036June 21, 2002, p7(1)4 A83552556RKInnovest wins SRI research award, launches new fund. (Fund Management News),%Euroweek0952-7036Feb 22, 2002, p24(1) A83446961^WEx-Goldman analyst joins socially responsible investment fund. (Fixed Income Fund News)3*$Euroweek0952-7036Feb 15, 2002, p8(1) A74339872$SRI takes a giant step forward`ZJASSA: the Journal of the Securities Institute of Australia0313-5934Summer 2000 i4, p32(2) A15804622.'Morals maketh money: ethical investment4 The Economistt$table cartoon illustration USoPJThe greening of the grey : national competition policy and the environmentQGU E-Resource:3http://www26.gu.edu.au/readings/ppp/2004ppp-020.pdf 2000$SRI takes a giant step forward`ZJASSA: the Journal of the Securities Institute of Australia0313-5934Summer 2000 i4, p32(2) A74339872 2003ZSFinancial Services: Socially-Responsible Investment Market Reaches Euro 336 Billion0*European Report1021-4267Oct 22, 2003, p343 A109127830 2003Investing for positive change: in the second part of our look at how the world of corporate finance approaches sustainable development, we consider the progress of Socially Responsible InvestmentyD>Energy & Environmental Management1460-7530Nov-Dec 2003, p18(2) A112245363 2004&SRI growth offers opportunitiesB8Animal ; Care ; Ethics ; Medicine ; Research ; Suffering Ag 93 English 1993 A90216676Stewart, JulesjdMoral money: in the 19th century, American religious groups boycotted companies that supported slavery or were involved with alcohol. Their action prompted an ethical finance movement which has since crossed to the UK and is now gathering pace across mainland Europe. Geographical charts the rapid rise of socially responsible investment. (ethical finance)60Geographical0016-741XAugust 2002, v74 i8, p48(3)NGThe Attitudes of Business Majors Toward the Teaching of Business Ethics2,Stewart, Karen Felicetti, Linda Kuehn, Scott Journal of Business Ethics158913-918@ 0167-4544$Business majors were tested for their attitudes toward the teaching of business ethics in university business education. Respondents indicated that they considered ethics an important part of a business curriculum and that they preferred integrating ethics into a number of different courses rather than taking a separate compulsory or elective ethics course. Ethical business practices were seen by respondents as increasing profit and return on investment and creating a positive work environment and public perception of the organization.@9Business ; Business Ethics; Education ; Ethics ; Teaching Ag 96 English 1996p"0&Maignan, Isabelle Ferrell, O.C. 2004NGCorporate social responsibility and marketing: an integrative framework2+Journal of the Academy of Marketing Scienceo321- 3-19on file.VOStakeholder corporate social responsibility market orientation ethics Communityd]Beyond the Bottom Line, Putting Social Responsibility to Work for Your Business and the World(!Makower, Joel Introcaso, David M. Journal of Business Ethics1616 1765-1766 0167-4544:4D 97 Simon-and-Schuster : New York, 1994 Book-Review 1994~xSocial Responsibility and the Marketing Educator: A Focus on Stakeholders, Ethical Theories, and Related Codes of Ethics*#Malhotra, Naresh K. Miller, Gina L.k Journal of Business Ethics192211-224n 0167-4544{This paper is a commentary on the discussion document by M. Joseph Sirgy (1996) which attempts to develop a marketing educator code of ethics. The authors center their discussion around the concepts of "Social responsibilities in relation to certain publics" and "Social responsibilities in relation to certain actions", as presented in the Sirgy paper, "Certain Publics" issues and "Certain Actions" issues are both examined in light of each of the stakeholder groups, as well as in terms of several ethical theories. Finally, the proposed "Academy of Marketing Science" marketing educator code of ethics is compared to the ethics codes of other marketing organizations.LECode of Ethics; Education ; Ethics ; Marketing ; Stakeholder Sirgy, M Ap 99 English 1999VOAn Analysis of U.S. Disinvestment from South Africa: Unity, Rights, and Justice$Malone, David Goodin, Susanna  Journal of Business Ethics1616 1687-1703 0167-4544@9This study examines the issues associated with the disinvestment of U.S. interests from South Africa that took place in the mid-80s from the perspective of three dominant moral theories: utility, rights, and justice. By examining the issues in light of these three theories, the paper attempts to establish a decision framework from which managers and investors can evaluate similar decisions they are facing around the world today. Similarly, the reading may prove useful to educators who incorporate discussions of ethical decision making into the classroom. (edited)HAAmerican ; Ethics ; Investment ; Justice ; Rights ; South African D 97 English 1997F@Reinhold Niebuhr's Paradox: Groundwork for Social ResponsibilityMalotky, Daniel James{"Journal of Religious Ethicsc311101-123 0384-9694|This paper is an examination of Reinhold Niebuhr's embrace of the paradoxical in relation to his conception of the self. It also seeks to defend his position, suggesting that in the light of Niebuhr's negative apologetic, the paradoxical self represents the only intelligible means of self-understanding available. Though Niebuhr never develops this epistemological ground, it may provide a way of avoiding the moral consequentialism to which Niebuhr appears to be resigned. The resulting framework points toward moral pragmatism, retaining its orientation and relevance in the midst of deliberations concerning means and ends. (edited)F@Epistemology ; Freedom ; Paradox ; Social Responsibility NiebuhrSpr 03 English 2003 hhLiedtka, Jeannes 2002 Ethics and the New Economy"Business and Society Review\ 1071 1-19on file4-ethics economics values community of practice 82Characterises 'the new economy' - people are more central than ever before, in different ways and with different skills. ARgues that the arrival of the new economy creates an unprecedented opportunity to improve the moral quality of organisations. Alternative value system - that of a commuity of practice.Little, Matthew 2004$Charities Urged to Embrace SRI Third Sector 336\9s 9 Juneon fileb SRI charitiesnreporting on the proposed regulatory obligations for charities to disclose investment approaches. Quotes Mesquita - charities specialist - 'ethical investment just adds another level of complication'.1574440586 (alk. paper)<6Sustainability perspectives for resources and business  Boca Raton Lewis Publishers 1999 373 98038870 Orie L. Loucks ... [et al.]. Includes bibliographical references and index. Sect. I. Principles of Sustainability. Ch. 1. The Context of Sustainability / Ch. 2. Natural Science Foundation of Sustainability: Health and Integrity of Resources / Ch. 3. Sustainability and Economic Well-Being / Ch. 4. Natural Resource Conflicts and Sustainability / Ch. 5. Environmental Ethics and Corporate Decision Making for Sustainable Performance / Ch. 6. Valuation and Reporting / Ch. 7. Sustainability and Business Management Systems / Ch. 8. Decision-Making and the Environment: Integrating Scope and Values / Sect. II. Case Studies on Sustainability. Ch. 9. Ashland Chemical: Achieving Sustainability Through the Use of Responsible Management Systems - Internal Environmental, Health, and Safety Auditing: Case Study Number 1 / Ch. 10. Maxxam Group Inc.'s Takeover of the Pacific Lumber Company: Case Study Number 2 / Ch. 11. Walnut Acres, Organic Farms: Case Study Number 3 / Ch. 12. From the Earth to the Table: Fetzer Vineyards and Its Bonterra Wines: Case Study Number 4 / Ch. 13. General Electric Aircraft Engines: Pollution Control Investment Analysis: Case Study Number 5 / Ch. 14. The David J. Joseph Company: Closing the Loop in the Automobile Industry: Case Study Number 6 / Ch. 15. Environmental Hazards in Transportation: The Response of Grand Trunk Railroad to a Derailment: Case Study Number 7 / Ch. 16. The Procter & Gamble Company: Reducing Packaging Waste in the United States and Germany, 1987-1994: Case Study Number 8 / Ch. 17. Electricity Load Management and Stakeholders: Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company: Case Study Number 9 / Ch. 18. Community-Industry Dialogue in Risk Management: Responsible Care and Worst-Case Scenarios in the Valley of the Shadow: Case Study Number 10 /This reference was written to help students and professionals involved in business, science, or engineering to understand the changes occurring in the workplace. It serves as a step toward understanding how business and science, as professional communities, are adapting to new information about risks to the environment. Various chapters are devoted to resources, values, and valuation systems. Each section develops principles such as resilience and integrity in the economy and the environment.Sustainable development. Natural resources. Industrial management Environmental aspects. Economic development Environmental aspects.Loucks, Orie L..(QGU Nathan HC79.E5 S8666 1999 In LibraryNH0072954442 0072818352 (alk. paper) 0071113002 (international alk. paper)&Auditing and assurance services 1st New York  McGraw-Hill 2005 xiii, 7642004042580 Timothy J. Louwers ... [et al.]. Auditing & assurance services Includes index. Ch. 1. Auditing and assurance services -- Ch. 2. Professional standards -- Ch. 3. Management fraud and audit risk -- Ch. 4. Engagement planning -- Ch. 5. Internal control evaluation : assessing control risk -- Ch. 6. Employee fraud and the audit of cash -- Ch. 7. Revenue and collection cycle -- Ch. 8. Acquisition and expenditure cycle -- Ch. 9. Production and payroll cycle -- Ch. 10. Finance and investment cycle -- Ch. 11. Completing the audit -- Ch. 12. Reports on audited financial statements -- Module A. Assurance and other public accounting services -- Module B. Professional ethics -- Module C. Legal liability -- Module D. Internal, governmental, and fraud audits -- Module E. Overview of sampling -- Module F. Attribute sampling -- Module G. Variables sampling -- Module H. Information system auditing. Auditing. Louwers, Timothy J.JCQGU Logan HF5667 .A815 2005 DUE: 04/01/05 17:00 QGU Nathan On OrderLydenberg, Steven D. 2003VOTrust Building and Trust Busting: Corporations, Government and Responsibilitiess JCC11 23-27ton file\,&corporate citizenship Trust RegulationArgues that the profit motive can only push disclosure and adoption of CC programs so far and that government involvement is needed.:3http://www.domini.com/common/pdf/jcc11lydenberg.pdfMacDonalad, G. Jeffrey 2004("Has Social Investing Lost its Way?"The Christian Science Monito13 15 Novemberon line Hawken2,The Choice of Criteria in Ethical InvestmentMackenzie, CraigBusiness Ethics7{2 81-86 0962-8770How do ethical investment funds choose their ethical criteria? How intelligent is this process from an ethical point of view? This paper reports on his field work carried out as part of the Bath University 'Morals and Money' Project.<5Criteria ; Ethics ; Investment ; Money ; Moral Theory Ap 98 English 1998P3*NrprHASocial Responsibility Ethics: Doing Right, Doing Good, Doing WellClark, Charles R.Ethics and Behavior 3 3-4K303-327, 1050-8422 ZSThe ethics of social responsibility is discussed in reference to six case vignettes drawn from forensic psychology. A definitional model of social responsibility is proposed, and two unequal components of the concept -- respect for the individual and concern for social welfare -- are identified. The sources of ethical conflict in regard to social responsibility are enumerated. Scholarly criticism of the value orientation of forensic psychology is reviewed, and forensic psychology is contrasted with social policy advocacy efforts made by organized psychology. The social responsibility obligations of psychologists in the microethical sphere, where their actions affect individuals, are differentiated from the obligations psychology has when operating in the macroethical sphere of social policy. The ethical problems inherent in policy advocacy brought about by individual psychologists working with individuals are underscored: the inevitable element of deception, the violation of role integrity, and the circumvention of social structures and institutions that safeguard the rights of individuals.PPIEthics ; Forensics ; Laws ; Morality ; Psychology ; Social Responsibility 1993 English 1993}Conflicts of Interest Arising from the Prudent Investor Rule: Ethical Implications for Over-the-Counter Derivative Securities2,Clark, John M. Ferrell, Linda Ferrell, O. C. Journal of Business Ethics472165-173 0167-4544 This paper emphasizes the ethical responsibility held by trustees and their organizations to eliminate potential conflict of interests through internal control and monitoring. Recent lessons learned from the corporate ethics crisis and requirements of the 2002 Sarbanes Oxley Act would suggest that conflict of interest must be eliminated with third party validation of derivative pricing. By performing due diligence and validation, the trustee is able to satisfy the requirements under the 'prudent investor rule'. (edited)W81Conflict of Interest; Ethics ; Investment ; StockO I 03 English 2003^WCodes of Ethics: Investment Company Money Managers Versus other Financial ProfessionalsK4.Clarke, James Duska, Ronald Rongione, Nicholas.(Business and Professional Ethics Journal144 43-55 0277-2027R@9Code of Ethics; Ethics ; Finance ; Manager ; ProfessionalWint 95 Englisha 1995B;Shareholders and Corporate Community Involvement in Britain{ Clarke, JuliaBusiness EthicsI6x4201-207e 0962-87704.Corporate community involvement is attracting increasing interest in Britain, but what do shareholders feel about this use of company assets? This timely survey of top UK corporate donors provides interesting data on current practice and explores the degree to which shareholders are consulted.(edited)>8British ; Community ; Corporation ; Ethics ; Shareholder O 97 English 1997Do Animals Have Rights?  Cohen, CarlEthics and Behavior72 91-102 1050-8422B;A right, unlike an interest, is a valid claim, or potential claim, made by a moral agent, under principles that govern both the claimant and the target of the claim. Animals cannot be the bearers of rights because the concept of rights is essentially human; it is rooted in and has force within a human moral world.82Animal ; Animal Rights; Ethics ; Medicine ; Rights 1997 English 1997Cowton, Christopher Jt 1998&Socially Responsible Investment.(Encyclopedia of Applied Ethics, Volume 4 181-90on filea$socially responsble investmentB;Accounting and Financial Ethics: From Margin to Mainstream? Cowton, Christopher J.Business Ethics8x2E 99-107 0962-8770VOBased on an inaugural professorial lecture given at the University of Huddersfield, this paper reviews ethical (or socially responsible) investment in the United Kingdom, explaining how it is carried out in practice. It also discusses the financial and ethical status of ethical investment. It goes on to identify for further study a number of ethical issues related to more mainstream accounting and financial practice, including creative accounting, the implications of running organizations (e.g., in healthcare) on a primarily financial basis, and the role of the accountancy profession.:4Accounting ; Ethics ; Finance ; Investment ; Pension Ap 99 English 1999 b_^` ~]@Dpd4 Shailer, Greg 200481Introduction to Corporate Governance in Australial Canberra Pearson - SprintPrintnon filet$Corporate governance Australia^XThe Construct Validity of the Kinder, Lydenberg & Domini Social Performance Ratings DataSharfman, Mark Journal of Business Ethics153287-296 0167-45440.(Carroll (1991) encouraged researchers in Social Issues Management (SIM) to continue to measure Corporate Social Performance (CSP) from a variety of different perspectives utilizing a variety of different measures. In addition, Wolfe and Aupperle (1991) (and others) have asserted that there is no, single best way to measure CSP and that multiple measures and perspectives help develop the field. However, Pfeffer (1993) suggest that a lack of consistent measurement has constrained organization studies (and by implication, the field of social issues management), in its development as a field. It may be in the best interest of social issues management researchers to try to development a common body of measures and data. Recently, Kinder, Lydenberg and Domini & Co. (KLD--a social choice investment advisory firm) has made available their social performance database. The KLD data have potential to become a widely accepted set of CSP measures. The purpose of this paper is to present a construct validity study comparing the KLD data to other measures of CSP.("Data ; Ethics ; Society Carroll, A M 96 English 1996  SIF  2003PI2003 Report on Socially Responsible Investing Trends in the United States\$SIF Industry Research Program2  Washington DC1 Social Investment Forume December 2003part copy in files@:Trends Finance advocacy community investment United States<6http://www.socialinvest.org/areas/research/default.htm  SIF 2005}Mutual Funds, Proxy Voting, and Fiduciary Responsibility: How Do Funds Rate on Voting Their Proxies and Disclosure Practices? Social Investment Forum April 2005*$shareholder activism proxy voting USRLhttp://www.socialinvest.org/areas/research/votingpractices/SRIBooklet.v8.pdfA Companion to Ethics2 Singer, Peter  Blackwell  Cambridge 1991Written for the general reader and student, this volume surveys the entire field of ethics. Section headings are: I) The Roots; II) The Great Ethical Traditions; III) Western Philosophical Ethics; IV) How Ought I to Live?: V) Applications; VI) The Nature of Ethics; VII) Challenge and Critique. Forty-seven different essays, each of 3000 to 6000 words, allow for a comprehensive discussion of these topics.:3Application ; Ethics ; History ; Theory ; TraditionENGLISH>8Henry Spira's Search for Common Ground on Animal Testing Singer, Peter{.(Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics81 9-22 0963-1801~xThis extract from my book, "Ethics into Action: Henry Spira and the Animal Rights Movement" (Rowman and Littlefield, 1998) seeks to show that there is common ground between at least some of the animal rights movement and those who carry out experiments on animals. It does this by examining the work of one leading animal rights activist in the area of product safety testing.4-Animal ; Ethics ; Medicine ; Testing Spira, HWint 99 English 1999  SIOb 200,&Canadian Social Investment Review 2002 $Social Investment Organisation March 2003on fileCanada SRI industrytNGquite comprehensive reporting on the state of the SRI industry in Candawww.socialinvestment.ca Virtue Ethics"Slote, Michael Crisp, Roger Oxford Univ Pr New York 1997 0198751893This volume brings together much of the strongest and most influential work undertaken in the field of virtue ethics over the last four decades. Divided into four sections, it includes articles critical of other traditions; early attempts to offer a positive vision of virtue ethics; some later criticisms of the revival of virtue ethics; and, finally, some recent, more theoretically ambitious essays in virtue ethics.(publisher)*$Ethics ; Moral Theory; Vice ; VirtueEnglish2,An Outline of a System of Utilitarian Ethics$Smart, John Jamieson Carswell  Melbourne  MelbourneO 1961Adopting a non-cognitivist metaethics, smart presents hedonistic-act utilitarianism as a position which appeals to benevolent and sympathetic men. he renounces any attempt to prove the position, but he does try to show that it is not open to the usual objections. there are some interesting comments on the concept of happiness and a brief attempt to show a way in which game theory can be used in a utilitarian position.xrAct Utilitarianism; Ethics ; Game Theory; Happiness ; Hedonism ; Metaethics ; Noncognitivism ; Rule UtilitarianismENGLISH4.0201473771 0201473771 (hbk.) 020163533X (pbk.)Solnik, Bruno H. International investmentsO 4th & Reading, Mass. ; Harlow, England Addison-Wesley 2000 xxvii, 737*$The Addison-Wesley series in finance99023680 Bruno Solnik. Includes bibliographical references and index. Pt. 1. The International Monetary Environment. Ch. 1. Foreign Exchange. Ch. 2. Foreign Exchange Parity Relations. Ch. 3. Foreign Exchange Determination and Forecasting. App. Statistical Supplements on Forecasting Asset Returns -- Pt. 2. International Investing and Market Equilibrium. Ch. 4. The Case for International Diversification. App. Costs in International Investment. Ch. 5. International Asset Pricing: Theory and Tests -- Pt. 3. Stock Market Investment. Ch. 6. Equity: Markets and Instruments. Ch. 7. Equity: Concepts and Techniques. Ch. 8. Emerging Stock Markets -- Pt. 4. Fixed-Income Investment. Ch. 9. Bonds: Markets and Instruments. Ch. 10. Bonds: Concepts and Techniques. App. Advanced Section on Implied Forward Rates. Ch. 11. Swaps -- Pt. 5. Futures, Options, and Other Things. Ch. 12. Futures. App. Advanced Section on Hedging. Ch. 13. Options. App. Valuing Currency Options. Ch. 14. Currency Risk Management. App. Advanced Section on Optimal Currency Hedging. Ch. 15. Commodities, Real Estate, and Alternative Investments. App. Advanced Section on Evaluating Natural Resource Investments -- Pt. 6. Strategy, Organization, and Control. Ch. 16. International Performance Analysis. App. AIMR Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS). Ch. 17. Structuring the International Investment Process. App. Advanced Section on Optimal Asset Allocation -- App. The Code of Ethics.60"The fourth edition of one of the classic treatments in the field of international investments leads the way with its coverage of institutions, exposition of theory and recent empirical research, detailed presentation of practical applications, and thought-provoking problems for students."--BOOK JACKET.Investments, Foreign.`YQGU GoldCoast HG4538 .S52 2000 In Library QGU Nathan HG4538 .S52 2000 DUE: 04/01/05 17:009N8"& Di Norcia, Vincent Tigner, Joyce 20006/Mixed Motives and Ethical Decisions in Business  Journal of Business Ethics251 1-13 Filed under DZSDiscerning the motives that lead business people to make ethical decisions in economic contexts is important, for it aids the moral evaluation of such decisions. But conventional economic theory has for too long assumed an egoist model of motivation, to which many contrast an altruist view of ethical choices. The result is to see business decision making as implying dilemmas. On the other hand, if one assumes multiple motives, economic and ethical, in ordinary business decisions, a more fruitful model of ethical motivation in such decisions emerges. Multiple motives are assumed to be the norm in a world of large organizations, complex decisions and stakeholder management. An example of a technology acquisition decision, with environmental overtones is presented in illustration of this approach. A method for discerning motives, primarily in terms of behavioral efficacy is presented. On this basis a two step approach to morally evaluating mixed motives in business decisions is proposed. First, the fit of motives with substantive ethical values should be ascertained, and then the efficacy of moral motives in yielding ethical behavior and outcomes should be determined. This approach offers a much more concrete model of the actual role of moral motives in business decision making. It also signals the importance of moral learning in organizations.l useful paper6/Stephen Dillenburg Timothy Greene Homer EreksonS 2003leApproaching socially responsible investment with a comprehensive ratings scheme: Total social impact*\&Journal of Business Ethics; JBE433 167/ Mar01674544on file3`YStudies Social responsibility Investments Stakeholders Social impact Corporate governanceeThe socially responsible investment industry (SRI) is slowly changing from a screening, avoidance paradigm to a comprehensive paradigm that seeks to affect corporate behavior. Credible rating systems are a key component of this sea change. Reliable and recognizable social and environmental metrics are critical to this progress. The Total Social Impact (TSI) rating approach is a new social metric scheme based on a comprehensive rating of stakeholder issues. This paper describes the evolution of SRI ratings and the role that TSI hopes to play in affecting business behavior by promoting principled business leadership. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]vWORD COUNT: 57130960310782The private cost of socially responsible investingDiltz, J David"Applied Financial Economics Apr 19956952 Over $625 billion is invested in funds that screen holdings according to ethical considerations. A crucial issue to many investors is whether ethical screening affects portfolio performance. Some 28 common stock portfolios were examined over the period January 1, 1989 to December 31, 1991, in order to determine whether ethical screening has an impact on portfolio performance. Analysis of 11 distinct ethical screens and 3 combinations of screens reveals little impact. To the extent that any impacts are observed, the market appears to reward good environment performance, charitable giving, and an absence of nuclear and defense work, and it appears to penalize firms that provide family-related benefits, such as parental leave, job sharing, and dependent care assistance.US Social responsibility Social investing Portfolio performance Mathematical models Investment policy Ethics Cost analysis Comparative studiesthe greenhouse effect: implications for international environmental policy /Broadly committed to the goals and values of a green political perspective, the chapters in this book show the environmental crisis to be essentially a political-economic crisis. The pursuit of sustainability cannot proceed without significant changes in our economic enterprises, public institutions and personal lives. Reaching beyond the contradictions of sustainable development, the authors explore the kinds of political arrangements needed to throw open sustainability to wide-ranging debate, both national and international. They advance alternative environmental policymaking processes designed to forge a genuine political consensus around these questions, as well as institutional, cultural and behavioural strategies capable of translating it into effective policy solutions. Fundamental to these strategies, a progressive commitment to participatory democracy is seen to provide the surest footing for both the articulation and realization of a sustainable future.4.Sustainable development. Environmental policy.$Fischer, Frank Black, Michael.'QGU Nathan HC79.E5 G692 1995 In LibraryFlynn, Patricia C. 2003F?Ethics in the Board Room: Contracts or Fiduciary Relationships?*$Philosophy in the Contemporary World101 43-48 1077-1999on file.82Board Room Contract Corporation Ethics FiduciaryMost contemporary discussions of institutional ethics take contractual rather than fiduciary relations as the model for describing moral responsibilities, leaving institutional boards with few resources to support and critique their moral behavior. I argue that institutional fiduciary relationships cannot be characterized as contracts, either in fact or function. Each form of relationship privileges a different set of behaviors and values that are far from interchangeable.Spr-Sum 03 English1863391142 (pbk.)60Business ethics in Australia : a practical guide  Kew, Vic. <6Centre for Professional Development : Law Book Company 1994xxi, 208VOR.D. Francis. Includes index. Includes bibliographical references (p. 193-199). Business ethics Australia.F?Francis, Ronald D. Centre for Professional Development (Aust.),eVPQGU GoldCoast HF5387 .F72 1994 In Library QGU Nathan HF5387 .F72 1994 In Library A67342001Freeman, PeterHow green is your money?JDThe Bulletin with Newsweek1440-7485Sept 26, 2000, v118 i6243, p84(3) M@  ~~60Repurchase Announcements, Lies and False Signals*#Kracher, Beverly Johnson, Robert R.  Journal of Business Ethics1615 1677-1685 0167-4544Companies announcing plans and not following through are apparently within the letter of the law. However, we argue that companies announcing plans with no intention of repurchasing shares are guilty of either lying or sending false signals. These companies create distrust in the investment community and intentionally mislead the public in violation of the SEC's antifraud provisions. Changes in the reporting procedures concerning repurchase plans are ethically and legally warranted.(edited)2+Ethics ; Firm ; Public ; Repurchase ; Stock N 97 English 1997@9Socially Responsible High Tech Companies: Emerging IssuesKrumsiek, Barbara Journal of Business Ethics433179-187C 0167-4544Calvert analyzes every company in its socially screened portfolio for work place practices, environmental impact, community relations, product safety and benefit, and international human rights. Avoidance and positive screens are used on each issue. This paper reviews these screens with socially responsible high technology companies. It illustrates a host of emerging issues including distributed equity and social justice, community impact, and sustainability.LFCalvert Group; Ethics ; Investment ; Social Responsibility; TechnologyMr III 03 English 2002("Kujala, Johanna Pietilainen, Tarja 2004LEFemale managers' ethical decision-making: a multidimensional approach Journal of Business Ethics53 153-63 paper on filet,&female ethics Feminism Business Ethics^WCommentary on "Social Responsibility and the Marketing Educator: A Discussion Document" Kurtz, D. L. Journal of Business Ethics192207-209 0167-4544^>8Education ; Ethics ; Marketing ; Responsibility Sirgy, M Ap 99 English 1999HBAnimal Models in Biomedical Research: Some Epistemological Worries$LaFollette, Hugh Shanks, NiallPublic Affairs Quarterly72113-130 0887-0373The public (and most philosophers) support the widespread use of animals in biomedical research because they are convinced it substantially benefits humans. We acknowledge that animal experimentation has likely benefitted humans. However, we offer historical and methodological ground for deflating researchers' claims about its value. Once the limitations of animal research are recognized, the character of the moral debate concerning its use we change.NHAnimal ; Epistemology ; Ethics ; Knowledge ; Medicine ; Model ; Research Ap 93 English 1993@9Chaos Theory: Analogical Reasoning in Biomedical Research$LaFollette, Hugh Shanks, NiallIdealistic Studies243241-254R 0046-8541In this article we discuss two divergent accounts of non- human animals an analog models of human biomedical phenomena. Using a classical account of analogical reasoning, toxicologists and teratologists claim that if the model and subject modeled are substantially similar, then test results in non- human animals are likely applicable to humans. However, the same toxicologists report that different species often react very differently to the same chemical stimuli. The best way to understand their findings is to abandon the classical view of analogical -- i.e., linear -- reasoning, and replace it with a version informed by chaos theory. We briefly outline the current understanding of chaos, and trace its implications for toxicology and teratology.60Chaos ; Medicine ; Reason ; Science ; ToxicologyFall 94 English 1994d^A Study of the Ethical Performance of Foreign-Investment Enterprises in the China Labor Market Lam, Kit Chun Journal of Business Ethics374349-365 0167-4544&This paper analyzes the ethical performance of foreign-investment enterprises operating in China in comparison to that of the indigenous state-owned enterprises, collectives and private enterprises. It uses both the deontological approach and the utilitarian approach in conceptualization, and applies quantitative and econometric techniques to ethical evaluations of empirical evidences. It shows that according to various ethical performance indicators, foreign-investment enterprises have fared well in comparison with local firms. (edited)2,Chinese ; Ethics ; Foreign Investment; LaborJe I 02 English 2002,%When to Terminate a Charitable Trust?Landesman, CliffAnalysis551 12-13 0003-2638The prospect of infinite investment growth presents the utilitarian donor to a charitable trust with a problem: when should the trust stop growing and start helping?JDCharity ; Decision Theory; Ethics ; Trust ; Utilitarianism ; Utility Ja 95 Englisho 1995William S Laufer 200360Social screening of investments: An introduction&Journal of Business Ethics; JBEn433(163-165 Mar101674544on file3 Screening*WORD COUNT: 1380jk "Hume on the Nonhuman AnimalBeauchamp, Tom L.("Journal of Medicine and Philosophy244x322-335 0360-5310Hume does not attribute a moral sense or capacity of judgment to animals, but he does suggest that their actions exhibit moral qualities, such as other-regarding instincts. Hume allows in-kind differences in both demonstrative reason and moral judgment, but in the domains of both causal reason and moral agency he believes there are differences of degree rather than of kind. Hume's most significant philosophical contribution was to move as far as anyone before him to a naturalistic explanation of human and nonhuman minds that invited psychological and epistemological examination of minds by using the identical methods and categories for man and beast. (edited).'Animal ; Ethics ; Human ; Medicine Hume Ag 99 English 1999Boatright, John Raymonda 1999Ethics in finance; Malden, Mass. ; Oxford Blackwell Publishersix, 2093@90631214267 (hbk. alk. paper) 0631214275 (pbk. alk. paper)/|vQGU GoldCoast HF5387 .B63 1999 In Library QGU Logan HF5387 .B63 1999 In Library QGU Nathan HF5387 .B63 1999 In Librarya few pages on file-:3Business ethics. Finance Moral and ethical aspects."Beginning with examples of the scandals that have shaken public confidence in the ethics of Wall Street, this book explains the need for ethics in the personal conduct of finance professionals and the operation of financial markets and institutions."--BOOK JACKET. "Ethics in Finance provides a rigorous analysis of ethical issues in finance that is suitable for students of finance and business ethics as well as anyone involved in financial activities."--BOOK JACKET.jc98033146 John R. Boatright. Foundations of business ethics ; 1 Includes bibliographical references and index. 1. Financial Ethics: An Overview -- 2. Theoretical Perspectives in Financial Ethics -- 3. Ethical Issues in Financial Services -- 4. Ethical Issues in Investment Decisions -- 5. Ethics in Financial Markets -- 6. The Financial Theory of the Firm.aBoatright, John R. 20014-The Future of Corporate Social Responsibility\.(Business and Professional Ethics Journal20 3-4\ 39-48h 0277-2027} paper on file0)Corporation Ethics Responsibility Society}The forces of technological innovation, globalization, and deregulation have created a highly competitive environment in which business leaders have ceased to have much discretion. As a result, the conventional understanding of corporate social responsibility as a managerial philosophy is no longer applicable. In this environment, various constituencies, especially consumers and activists, are able to exert great pressure on corporations through market activity. In the future, working through the market, as opposed to influencing managerial discretion, will be a more effective means for increasing corporate social responsibility.Fall-Wint 01 English0)Bone, Paula Fitzgerald Corey, Robert John 2000yPackaging Ethics: Perceptual Differences among Packaging Professionals, Brand Managers and Ethically-interested Consumersb Journal of Business Ethics24199-213 filed under B0)ethics Business Ethics Consumer attitudesRLIn this article, we explore ethical perceptions of three product packaging issues as viewed by packaging professionals, brand managers, and ethically-interested consumers. We examine differences between business practitioners and consumers with respect to ethical sensitivity, perceived consequences of business practices, and perceived industry norms. Additionally, we explore the prevalence of two types of values, pragmatic and moral, to determine if the use of these value-types differs among the three groups. We find that business practitioners exhibit less ethical sensitivity. Businesspeople also feel that the likelihood and severity of negative consequences resulting from a packaging practice is lower than do ethic ally-interested consumers. Finally, business practitioners do not differ from consumers with respect to moral values.*$Useful outline of elements of ethicsBoselovic, Len 2005:3Pittsburgh Post-Gazette Heard off the Street Column *#Knight Ridder Tribune Business Newso  Washington1b28 March filed under B SRI AlcoholPIStarbucks dumped by Pax World Funds because it produces a liqueur coffee. A14861199"Profit from your principlestable illustration0)Brill, Jack Reder, Alan Ferling, Rhona L.>8Financial Executive0895-4186Nov-Dec 1993, v9, n6, p54(3)jdCorporations and the Ethics of Social Responsibility: An Emerging Regime of Expansion and ComplianceBroadhurst, Arlene I.hBusiness Ethics92k 86-98i 0962-8770D>Corporate ethics has undergone significant change in response to environmental issues and is beginning to evolve further in response to emerging notions of social responsibility, defined in terms of human rights issues. Three dimensions of ethical behavior--national, international and theoretical--are defined and illustrated through three case studies. The increasingly complex interaction between two of the dimensions, national and international in a global context, poses a significant challenge to corporations attempting to develop and extend best practices. (edited)>8Corporation ; Ethics ; Expansion ; Social Responsibility Ap 00 Englishy 2000?>"John Rawls: Collected Papers$Freeman, Samuel Mendus, Susan"Philosophical Investigations241 78-82e 0190-0536<6Ja 01 Harvard-Univ-Pr : Cambridge MA, 1999 Book-Review 19990)An Ethics of Care or an Ethics of Justice$French, Warren Weis, Alexander Journal of Business Ethics27 1-2O125-136 0167-4544A conflict within the community of those investigating business ethics is whether decision makers are motivated by an ethics of justice or an ethics of caring. The proposition put forward in this paper is that ethical orientations are strongly related to cultural backgrounds. Specifically, Hofstede's cultural stereotyping using his masculine-feminine dimension may well match a culture's reliance on justice or caring when decisions are made. A study of college graduates from six countries showed that Hofstede's dimension was remarkably accurate in predicating a justice or caring orientation for decision makers from five of the six countries.:3Business Ethics; Care ; Ethics ; Feminine ; Justice S 00 English 2000jcEthical Concerns and Risk Perceptions Associated with Different Applications of Genetic Engineering(!Frewer, Lynn J. Shepherd, Richarde"Agriculture and Human Values121 48-57 0889-048XQuestions were directed at either perceived risk or ethical objections. The applications of genetic engineering were seen as riskier and less beneficial when applied to food production than medicine, although perceived control was independent of application. Optimistic bias was observed. Ethical and risk related objections were greater for applications to food than to medicine, and again dependent of the type of organism manipulated. The transfer of genetic material between "dissimilar" types of organism (for example, between plants and animals) were not associated with greater risk or ethical concern than transfers between "similar" types of organism (for example, between animals and animals). The public requirement for legislative control was also dissociated into risk or ethical objections to the technology, and found to be greater for risk-related concerns, although ethical considerations were also important.B;Ethics ; Food ; Genetics ; Medicine ; Research ; Technology@Winter 95 English` 1995 Frey, R. G. 1996TMMedicine, Animal Experimentation, and the Moral Problem of Unfortunate Humansm"Social Philosophy and Policy132181-211 0265-0525( paper on file)(!Animal Ethics Experiment MedicineRecent strides in medical science and technology hold our promise for the mitigation and removal of some of the most terrible human illnesses. Among the most important of these strides has been developments in xenograft or cross-species transplantation and in genetic engineering of animals on behalf of gene therapy in humans. These medical uses of animals for human benefit occur in an intellectual and ethical environment, however, in which the central trade-off upon which these uses depend, namely, animal sacrifice for human gain, is once again under moral scrutiny. At the very least, we need to be able to justify this use of animals. This paper sets out the beginnings of such a justification, one that permits (a good deal) of animal experimentation while accepting that animals count morally, that their lives are of value, and that discrimination on the basis of species is improper. It draws implications from the justification given for unfortunate (or tragic) humans.Sum 96 English6/Moral Community and Animal Research in Medicine Frey, R. G.Ethics and Behavior72123-136 1050-8422The invocation of moral rights in moral/social debate today is a recipe for deadlock in our consideration of substantive issues. How we treat animals and humans in part should derive from the value of their lives, which is a function of the quality of their lives, which in turn is a function of the richness of their lives. Consistency in argument requires that humans with a low quality of life should be chosen as experimental subjects over animals with a higher quality of life.D>Animal Rights; Ethics ; Medicine ; Research Cohen, C; Regan, T 1997 English 1997 /sZs76Lorne S Cummings 2000XQThe financial performance of ethical investment trusts: An Australian perspectivel&Journal of Business Ethics; JBE25 1; 1 79-92 May01674544 paper on file*`YAustralia Business ethics Studies Financial performance Investment policy Rates of returnThis study examines whether differences in financial performance exist for investment trusts which base their portfolio selection primarily on an ethical screen, compared to indexes which incorporate a broader spectrum of investments. Results indicate that on a risk-adjusted basis there is an insignificant difference in the financial performance of these trusts against three common market benchmarks. However as to the extent of the directional effect, there does exist slightly superior financial performance by ethical trusts against their respective industry average indexes, but an underperformance against a smaller company's index and the market as a whole. The lack of a distinct advantage in the short to medium term for applying an ethical screen, may in part be due to the recent development of ethical investments in Australia. Stronger performances by older ethical investment trusts may indicate in superior returns are more likely to occur over a longer term.WORD COUNT: 6373(!Dalton, Dan R. Cosier, Richard A. 1991pjAn issue in corporate social responsibility: an experiential approach to establish the value of human life Journal of Business Ethics10 311-15on file 60corporate social responsibility human life ValueDavidson, Amanda 2004(!Independent View: Amanda DavidsoneMoney Marketingp 3 Juneon fileexr"It is fair to say that, in the eary days, some of the stances taken by ethical funds and, indeed, ethical advisers were quite dark green. Many where wedded to a purist approach and some were prepared to sacrifice performance to achieve this. We did not take this view but a dopted a mid-to light-green approach. We appreciate that clients do want to make money while investing responsibly. It is intersting to see how the dark-green nature of ehtical investment developed over time to adopt a lighter-green approach....In general, the older ones tend to be more restrictive in nature and the more recent ones tend to be broader based. Indeed, we have now moved beyond the light-green approach to engagement... Many criticics say this has watered down the proposition of socially-responsible investments. We see it as broadening the ethical proposition to reach a wider audience.Davidson, Coline 2005,&Australia's Top 100 Managed Funds 2005 Brisbane  Wrightbooks "HG5894 .5 .A97 2005 (UQ ssh) FundsDavies, Graeme 2005 Total Risk0.618...5n 1-3f 5 JanuaryrFiled under U (UNEP FI)@:UNEP FI Pension funds Institutional investments engagement|Discusses the advantages of fund collaboration and engagement. Says that screening is not effective for wholesale investors.PIwww.epa.vic.gov.au/Programs/UNEP/docs/UNEP_FI_Newsletter_January_2005.pdfaDavis, Stephen 20056/Mobilizing Ownership - the Civil Economy Agendad0.618...5{ 8-10JanuaryoFiled under U (UNEP FI)..'Institutional investments civil economy:3argues that institutional investors are failing to fulfil fudiciary responsibility to the citizen-savers whose money they invest, but obey corporate authority instead. Lists ways in which this failure manifest and recommends new approaches to a 'civil economy'. Note: writing a book about the civil economy.ePIwww.epa.vic.gov.au/Programs/UNEP/docs/UNEP_FI_Newsletter_January_2005.pdf81The Ethical Foundations of Responsible Investment<6Dembinski, Paul H. Bonvin, Jean Michel Dommen, Deouard Journal of Business Ethics482K203-213f 0167-4544fIn the area of investment, responsibility may be expressed via four types of ethical concern: value-based ethics resulting in the exclusion of so-called "vicious" companies from the investment portfolio; fructification-oriented ethics with a view to long-term investment; consequence-based ethics aimed at initiating a behavioral change in the investment target; and ethics envisaged as a discriminating criterion in the search of the best financial performance. No single formula of responsible investment is available, and the "responsible" approach necessarily implies the active involvement of a free acting subject striving to tackle fundamental ethical issues. (edited)>7Consequence ; Ethics ; Investment ; Responsible ; ValueD (I) 03 English 2003 $Deni-Green-Consulting-Services 2002:3Socially Responsible Investment in Australia - 2002s $Ethical Investment AssociationSRI Australia Finance $Deni-Green-Consulting-Services 2004:3Socially Responsible Investment in Australia - 2004S Sydney $Ethical Investment AssociationOctoberuon filelAustralia SRI FinanceJDhttp://www.eia.org.au/files/MNJLXB5Z5K/2004%20SRI%20benchmarking.pdf A76715336Derkley, KarinScreened for performancePersonal Investor!.'Photograph illustration Melbourne, Vic.nl$Intrinsic Value and Investment O'Day, KenUtilitas112X194-214 0953-8208In this paper I critically evaluate Ronald Dworkin's attempt in "Life's Dominion" to understand sacred value as a form of intrinsic value which is grounded in investment. I argue that there are two problems with Dworkin's conception of intrinsic value. First, it does not allow him to distinguish, as he must, between incremental and sacred values. Secondly, sacred value "qua" intrinsic value is not the kind of value which can be grounded in investment. I argue that both of these problems are an implication of a realist conception of intrinsic value. Nevertheless, investment does seem to play a role in our judgments about intrinsic value and in light of this I aim to develop an alternative account of intrinsic value which can make sense of this.,&Ethics ; Investment ; Value Dworkin, R Jl 99 English 19990521480957 (hc)O'Neill, OnoraPJTowards justice and virtue : a constructive account of practical reasoning Cambridge ; New York Cambridge University Press 1996 x, 230PJOnora O'Neill. Includes bibliographical references (p. 213-221) and index.4.Virtues. Virtue. Justice. Justice (Philosophy)SS&H B105.J87 O54 1996 9264195122>7Corporate social responsibility : partners for progress Paris Oecd 2001 1522002615519 Roundtable Conference "Partners for Progress--Towards a New Approach to Corporate Social Responsibility", (2000 : Paris, France) Governance Papers presented at a Roundtable Conference "Partners for Progress--Towards a New Approach to Corporate Social Responsibility," held Nov. 15, 2000, Paris, France. Includes bibliographical references (p. 151-152). Pt. 1. Corporate Social Responsibility in a Global Economy. Philanthropy and social investment: the French perspective. The role of business in the social agenda. Internal stakeholders and high road companies. Making a positive impact on society. The European Union's approach to corporate social responsibility -- Pt. 2. Stimulating Partnerships with Business at the Local Level. Partnerships and SMEs: addressing social exclusion. Empowerment to the community through partnerships. Applying the broker model in London. Overcoming the closure of the coal mines through active partnerships for local development. Welfare-to-Work: a smart solution for business. Combating exclusion through partnerships -- Pt. 3. Linking Ethics and Finance to Foster Social Responsibility. Saving banks serving the community. Responsible investing: focus on sustainable development.4-Social responsibility of business Congresses.i>8Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.,.'QGU GoldCoast HD60 .R68 2001 In Librarya C \GIdealistic Studies Inquiry<8International Journal of Business Performance Management(%International Philosophical Quarterly`ZJASSA: the Journal of the Securities Institute of Australia0313-5934Autumn 2002 i1, p12(3)lD`ZJASSA: the Journal of the Securities Institute of Australia0313-5934Summer 2000 i4, p32(2)lD\YJASSA: the Journal of the Securities Institute of Australia0313-5934Winter 2001 i2, p6(4)JCCTPJournal of Banking and Financial Services1443-6035June-July 2003, v117 i3, p4(3) Journal of Business EthicsDBD@Journal of Business Ethics0167-4544June 15, 2004, v52 i1, p1(10)DDAJournal of Business Ethics0167-4544June 15, 2004, v52 i1, p11(15)HBJournal of Business Ethics0167-4544June 15, 2004, v52 i1, p125(15)/U@DAJournal of Business Ethics0167-4544June 15, 2004, v52 i1, p27(17)DAJournal of Business Ethics0167-4544June 15, 2004, v52 i1, p45(13)DAJournal of Business Ethics0167-4544June 15, 2004, v52 i1, p59(13)DAJournal of Business Ethics0167-4544June 15, 2004, v52 i1, p99(10)HCJournal of Business Ethics0167-4544March 15, 2003, v43 i3, p167(11)U@HBJournal of Business Ethics0167-4544March 15, 2003, v43 i3, p189(6)/U@$Journal of Business Ethics; JBEUHBJournal of Consumer Affairs0022-0078Winter 1991, v25, n2, p221(14)/U@$Journal of Economic Psychology(UJournal of Investing|Journal of Medical Ethics("Journal of Medicine and Philosophy$Journal of Political PhilosophyU Journal of Religious EthicsDB Journal of Social PhilosophyB0+Journal of the Academy of Marketing Sciencew($Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy MIT Sloan Management ReviewMoney Marketing4.Mother Jones0362-8841Nov 1988, v13, n9, p51(1)(.X0-Mother Jones0362-8841Nov 1998, v23 i6, p35(1)Multinational Monitor<9National Underwriter; Life, health/financial services ed.New York Times MagazinePensions & InvestmentsPersonal InvestorPersonalist Forum Philosophical InvestigationsB Philosophy and Public Affairs($Philosophy in the Contemporary WorldProfessional EthicsPublic Affairs QuarterlyRelations Industrielles($Review - Institute of Public Affairs$Science and Engineering Ethics(USloan Management Review Social Philosophy and PolicyBTeaching Business Ethics(#The Academy of Management Executive$!The American Behavioral Scientist$The Australian Economic ReviewHDThe Bulletin with Newsweek1440-7485Sept 26, 2000, v118 i6243, p84(3)@ The Christian Science Monito$!The Chronicle of Higher Education The EconomistThe Internal Auditor|$The Journal of Socio-Economics4/The Other Side0145-7675May 1999, v35 i3, p18(1).X82Theological Studies0040-5639Dec 2003, v64 i4, p893Theoretical Medicine("Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics Third SectorTime InternationalN| UNEP FIY UtilitasUtne World Futures0,World Futures0260-4027Feb 2001, v56 i4, p399 D   Catholicism Censurer ChairmanChaosCharacteristicsF charities Charity0 Chinese ChristianityCigarette industryity Citizenshipon civil economy Civil Law Classroomclimate change Cloning0Clothing industryCode of Ethics Cohen, Ci Coleman, Jry  collaboration Collectivism CommerceCommercial lawsbi Commitment  Common Goodhi Communication Communitycommunity investmentcommunity of practiceComparative analysis0Comparative studiesce Compassioneri complianceincConflict of Interest0 Conscience ConsequenceConsequentialism0Consumer attitudes0consumer demand ContractoContractualismp Controlnc Copyrightcorporate citizenshipCorporate governanceyCorporate managementmcorporate relationshipsYCorporate responsibility corporate social performance$corporate social responsibility CorporationCorporations Accounting)Correlation analysiss corruptionCost Cost analysis Criminal Laws Criteriacriticism of SRI CrueltyRiCSR CulturesData0 Databaset DecisionDecision ElementDecision Procedure Decision Theory Democracy demography Derrida, Js< Dignity0 Disclosuren Distributiondivestment campaign Downsizingn driversenDutch companiesl Dutyx Dworkin, R(< Ecologys 0+Economic development Environmental aspects..economic discourse Economics Ecosystem Education effectivenessefficient market theoryN| Embryoy0 Emotionemempirical analysise i engagementnal Environment<Environmental Ethics0Environmental managementEnvironmental policy.Environmental protection Epistemology< Equalityoequator principlesERISA ethical fundsethical investmentethical investors Ethicist Ethics(0Ethics Committees Europe Evidence Evolution ExpansionExpenditures, Public Experiment(<Experimentation Exploitation Fairness Familyd Efamily-friendly policies| Faustian female ethics Feminine Feminism Fiduciary Finance0finance cultureiv("Finance Moral and ethical aspects.D"Financial performanceFirmc FolkloreFoodcFood service Accounting.gForeign Investment0("Foreign trade promotion East Asia.D"$ Foreign trade promotion Vietnam.Foreign trade regulation. Forensics Free tradenal$!Free trade Environmental aspects. Free trade Social aspects.erp Freedomol Frey, Rti Friedman, MhiFundsFuture Generation Game Theoryri GendericsGene Generosity(<Genetic EngineeringՔ Genetics Gibbard, Ary Global GlobalizationGlobalization.iro GoetheogyGoodc Goodpaster, K GovernmentnGreekGrowth industries guidelines HappinessHarmc HawkenZ Healthy Health CareHealth Education Hedonisms HeideggerHigher Education Historye HIV/AIDSHotels Accounting.u͠ Hudson, YHumanHuman Existence@ human lifesoc Human Rights<HumanitarianismFHumec Ideology Individualsm0,Industrial management Environmental aspects. IndustryInformation society.,)Information technology Political aspects.,&Information technology Social aspects.(3 Injustice4 HAA Companion to Business Ethics, Frederick, Robert E (ed), 303 3210)Social Responsibility and Business Ethics.(Buchholz, Rogene A. Rosenthal, Sandra B.  BlackwellO  Cambridge 2002>7Business Ethics; Responsibility ; Social ResponsibilityEnglish Bukovansky, Mlada 2002NGCorruption is bad: Normative dimensions of the anti-corruption movement\ Canberra $Australian National University online corruption & examines arguments for combatting corruption. While many arguments do include ethical concerns, most focus on economic and institutional rationales. "First, to the extent that the economic literature on corruption has influenced international financial institutions, the message emanating from this literature that shrinking government and doing away with regulations and red tape are good ways to combat corruption55 raises questions as to what the governance agenda actually means. In simplest terms, economic accounts tend to suggest that less government is better government. Insofar as the governance agenda is grounded in economic scholarship and rationales, it reflects concerns about cutting the size of the public sector, which is in effect what the IMF at least often ends up recommending. Curbing corruption, from this point of view, is a byproduct of cutting the size and scope of the public sector. This approach does not go very far beyond providing lip service to more substantive institutional concerns such as transparency, accountability, separation of powers, and rule of law. In fact, it could be argued that cutting the public sector can just as easily inhibit as encourage the development of liberal institutions of governance. International financial institutions and big aid donor states may want less corruption, but by advocating less government they are not doing much to contribute to (and may inadvertently be undercutting) the positive development of good government." From the perspective of this paper, a further and crucial problem with institutionalist aspects of the anti-corruption regime is the inadequate attention to the fact that this regime attempts to unreflectively internationalise moral codes without inviting broader, inclusive public discourse on the nature and applicability of this normative baggage to diverse societies. In this vein, another problem of the economic and institutional rationales for the anti-corruption regime is that such rationales implicitly confine the problem of corruption to the developing world, since if corruption hurts development, the already developed countries presumably do not have much to worry about. But the strongest economies in the world today experienced (and still experience) widespread corruption. Discussing corruption in primarily economic and even institutional terms conceals the moral agenda implicit within the anti-corruption discourse. In a provocative pair of essays Jean-Phillipe Platteau, a Belgian economist, has revisited and gone beyond Max Webers The protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism77 in order to argue that the social conditions upon which the viability and efficiency of the market system rest include not only institutional mechanisms but also a generalised morality which supplements such institutions.:4http://rspas.anu.edu.au/ir/working%20papers/02-5.pdf("Public Goods and the Paying PublicByrne, Edmund F. Journal of Business Ethics142117-123 0167-4544l This paper proposes a way to undercut anarchist objections to taxation without endorsing an authoritarian justification of government coercion. I recommend a shareholder addendum to the doctrine of public goods. This recommendation involves modifying the public goods argument for government coercion to include a contributor- specific compensation proviso, thinking of contributors as investors, and including among the latter those whose investment is in the form not of a market transaction strictly speaking but of sacrifice. (edited)<5Anarchy ; Ethics ; Liberalism ; Public Good; Taxation F 95 English 1995Carpenter, Janice 2001&Ethical Investment in AustraliaSEthical Investment 20010 Brisbaneon filea History drivers Australiae~xEthical Challenges for Business in the New Millennium: Corporate Social Responsibility and Models of Management MoralityCarroll, Archie B. Business Ethics Quarterlye101 33-42 1052-150XWhat will constitute "business as usual" in the business ethics arena as we start and move into the new century? My overall thought is that we will pulsate into the future on our current trajectory and that the new century will not cause cataclysmic changes, at least not immediately. Rather, the problems and challenges we face now we will face then. Undoubtedly, new issues will arise but they will more likely be extensions of the present than discontinuities with the past. (edited)F?Business Ethics; Ethics ; Management ; Responsibility ; Society Ja 00 English 2000Carson, Thomas L.r 1993\UDoes the Stakeholder Theory Constitute a New Kind of Theory of Social Responsibility?o Business Ethics Quarterlyd3 2}171-176e 1052-150X, paper on file-D=Corporation Ethics Moral Responsibility Society Goodpaster, KIn a recent paper, Kenneth Goodpaster formulates three versions of the stakeholder theory of corporate social responsibility. He rejects the first two versions and endorses the third. I argue that the theory that Goodpaster defends under the name "stakeholder theory" is a version (albeit a somewhat different version) of Milton Friedman's theory of corporate social responsibility. I also argue that the first two formulations of the stakeholder theory which Goodpaster discusses are at most only slight modifications of other theories. I conclude by formulating a fourth version of the stakeholder theory which I believe does constitute a substantial departure from earlier theories of social responsibility. A 93 Englishurities analysts and portfolio managers from four Pacific Rim countries--Hong Kong, Japan, Singapore and Thailand--and compares the findings to a similar study of North American investment professionals to identify significant differences. The findings show that many differences exist due to cultural differences and differences in the regulatory environment between the Pacific Rim countries studied and North America.>7American ; Asian ; Business Ethics; Ethics ; Investment Je 98 English 1998-:tz   Domini, Amy 2001JDSocially Responsible Investing: Making a Difference and Making Money Chicago\ Dearborn TradeHG4910 .D655 2001\ SRIb0312216351 (cloth)hbWorld order for a new millennium : political, cultural, and spiritual approaches to building peace New York St. Martin's Press 1999xxi, 266VP99013634 A. Walter Dorn, editor. Includes bibliographical references and index. Message from the Secretary-General of the United Nations / Foreword / Introduction / 1. Conceptions of World Order / 2. The Historical Development of International Law / 3. Carrots, Sticks and Bombs: Securing Disarmament Treaty Compliance without a World Police / 4. Economic Bases for World Order: Corporate Capitalism and/or Market Socialism? / 5. World Order by Trade and Investment Decree: The Global Corporate System / 6. A Cold War Retrospective: Mishaps That Might Have Started Accidental Nuclear War / 7. The Decline of International War / 8. Indicators of Militarization: Coping with the Specter of Praetorianism / 9. Challenges for the World and for the United Nations / 10. Recent United Nations Agreements: A Force for Change (Annex: The Earth Charter) / 11. Monitoring the Rules: the United Nations and Iraq / 12. The Creation of an Independent and Effective International Criminal Court / 13. The United Nations in the Twenty-First Century: A Vision for an Evolving World Order / 14. The Evolution of Diplomacy: Coordinating Tracks I and II / 15. Quality of Life and a Culture of Peace / 16. UNESCO Declarations and Appeals -- 17. Building Peace through a New Ethics: An Educational Task / 18. World Order: Verbalized or Operational Concept? (A Christian Commentary) / 19. A Christian Statement of Faith on "Peace in the Nuclear Age" / 20. Pursuing Opportunities for Shalom in the World: A Jewish View / 21. From Inner Peace to World Peace: A Buddhist Perspective / 22. Creating Inner Peace: A Buddhist View / 23. Toward a "New World" Order: A Native Perspective / 24. World Religion for the Coming Age / 25. The Baha'i Conception of World Order / 26. The Inner Role of the United Nations / 27. The Caledon Declaration on Building a Foundation for Peace in the Third Millennium.{"World Order for a New Millennium examines one of the major issues of our age: how humanity should organize itself on the highest levels of governance - the global level. World Order for a New Millennium provides an overview of the various types of world order, based on the three strategies of coercion, exchange and integration. It then reviews the development of international law and the current means of promoting and enforcing it, in the absence of an international police force. The essays look at the role of the military in the Cold War and after, and review the prospects for war and peace in the next century."--BOOK JACKET.B;International relations. International organization. Peace.Dorn, A. Walter,&QGU Nathan JZ1308 .W67 1999 In Library@:The Legitimacy of Direct Corporate Humanitarian Investment$Dunfee, Thomas W. Hess, David Business Ethics Quarterly101 95-109 1052-150XPrivate firms are uniquely positioned to provide significant relief to the misery that pervades the developing world. Global misery has persisted due to a variety of failures in the provision of relief by nation-states and nongovernmental organizations, including corruption and the absence of strong background institutions in the countries in need of aid. In many situations, private firms have a comparative advantage over these entities in the provision of aid. (edited)B7Book reviews Social responsibility Environment Business A108144713 Emerson, JedNGThe blended value proposition: integrating social and financial returnsF@California Management Review0008-1256Summer 2003, v45 i4, p35-51 $Cowton, Christopher J. 1999JDPlaying by the Rules: Ethical Criteria at an Ethical Investment FundBusiness Ethics81 60-69 0962-8770on file/&Criteria Ethics Investment RulePIAlthough ethical investment is a growing phenomenon which attracts a significant amount of media interest, relatively little has been written about the internal operations of ethical investment funds. Using a variety of sources, including interviews with a fund manager and participant observation at meetings of the fund's ethical advisory committee, this paper examines the decision making of one ethical unit trust operating in the United Kingdom. In particular, it describes the development of the ethical criteria and the ways in which their implementation was monitored. (edited)Refers to Anderson (1996) who disputes the right of SRI funds to use the term 'ethical' - claims policies are incoherent, based on opinions, crude distinctions not careful judgements, aggressive simplicity. Refers to Nash (1990) contrasts codes with overarching set of ethical standards. Rules are important but do not address full range of ethical problems likely to be confronted. (65) Use of ethical criteria to deflect criticism from investors.4-Cox, Paul Brammer, Stephen Millington, Andrew 2004f_An empirical examination of institutional investor preferences for corporate social performancel Journal of Business Ethics521 27-43 A120909590 paper on file|vInstitutional investments corporate social performance socially responsble investment UK empirical analysis Regulationinvestigates the pattern of instituional shareholding in the UK and its relationship with socialy responsible behaviour by companies. Long-term insitutional investment is positively related to CSP. Statutory obligations for pension funds to disclose their approach to social investment is not reflected in larger investments in socially response companies. Life assurance companies which have similar financial characteristics but are not required to disclose their investment approaches in the same way are just as likely to invest in socially responsible companies. The pattern of institutional investment is related to the form which CSP takes. Employee-based CSP (probably due to risk reduction, efficiency) has a stronger relationship with long-term investment than community based CSP. long-term instittutional investors select through exclusion. So poor social performance is selected against, but good social performance is insignificant in attracting institutional investors. (41) The cimpact of regularatory action on the pattern of institutiona investment has been limited. "Altough each of the long-term investors faced some regulatory or institutional pressure either to disclose their stance regarding social impacts of their investment or to consider the congruence of their investmet policies with their broader objectives, we observed consdierable differences across these investors' preferences for CSP. (p. 41)<6Cramer, Jacqueline Jonker, Jan van der Heijden, Angela 20046/Making sense of corporate social responsibilityi Journal of Business Ethics55 215-22on filer>7corporate social responsibility Dutch companies meaningKVU. Rosen, Robertd 2001:4Ethical Investment Roots in Community & PermacultureEthical Investor5r13Octoberi in collectionHistory Australia SRIi 0814406386Rugman, Alan M.voThe end of globalization : why global strategy is a myth & how to profit from the realities of regional markets New York Amacom 2001xvi, 23700052585 Alan Rugman. The North American ed. has a new pref. and updated data. Includes bibliographical references (p. [220]-226) and index. 1. Introduction -- 2. The World Trade Organization: The Politics of Trade and Investment Agreements. The Crisis at the WTO. The European Union and United States Trade Wars -- 3. The New Social Actors Are Slowing Globalization. The Role of NGOs. Free Trade and Environmental Protection -- 4. Politics, Health Care, and Ethics -- 5. The Multilateral Agreement on Investment. The Political Economy of the Multilateral Agreement on Investment. Corporate Strategy and the Multilateral Agreement on Investment -- 6. The New Regionalism: The North American Free Trade Agreement -- 7. The Evidence on Triad Economic Activity. Definitions and Measures of Global Performance -- 8. The Evidence on Multinational Enterprises -- 9. Strategies for Triad Firms -- 10. Strategies of Twenty Triad-Based Multinationals -- 11. Conclusions: Firm Strategy and Government Policy.World Trade Organization. International business enterprises Management. Regionalism. Investments, Foreign. Foreign trade regulation. Free trade Social aspects. Free trade Environmental aspects. Globalization.T6/QGU Nathan HD62.4 .R84 2001 DUE: 22/12/04 19:00r Rights, Goals and FairnessScanlon, T. M. Erkenntnis11 81-95 0165-0106f_Rights are supposed to act as constraints on utilitarian reasoning, but they must have some foundation and what can this be other than the same human interests that utilitarianism appeals to? this suggests a "two-tier" theory: broadly utilitarian in ultimate justification but not thoroughgoingly consequentialist as it applies to particular cases. the aim of the paper is to describe a theory of this kind that avoids standard objections to "rule utilitarianism." topics discussed: what is maximized? how is the value of liberty represented? how do considerations of equality and fairness enter the theory?0*Ethics ; Fairness ; Right ; Utilitarianism$MY 77 ENGLISH JOURNAL-ARTICLE 1977>7Utilitarianism and Beyond , Sen, Amartya (Ed), 103 128.4(!Contractualism and UtilitarianismScanlon, T. M. Cambridge Univ PrO New York 1982&Contractualism ; UtilitarianismENGLISH A119024010 Scheer, Roddy(ZSJoining the club: greening corporations with socially responsible investment groups,&E1046-8021Jan-Feb 2004, v15 i1, p45(2)tudy provides a comparative examination of conventional and socially responsible investors, with the aim of identifying such factors. A total of 55 conventional investors and 54 ethical investors participated in the study by completing mailed questionnaires about their investment and general behaviour and their attitudes and beliefs. Results indicated some important differences between socially responsible and conventional investors in their beliefs of the importance of ethical issues, their investment decision-making style, and their perceptions of moral intensity. These results support the notion that socially responsible investors differ in critical ways to conventional investors, and are discussed in terms of theoretical and practical implications. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]WORD COUNT: 75680*Corporate Social Investments: Do They Pay?McMillan, G. Steven Journal of Business Ethics153309-314 0167-4544The stock market reaction to two very different corporate social investments (the 1977 Sullivan Principles adoption announcement and the 1990 McDonald's Corporation environmental statement) is explored. A market model event study methodology is employed using daily stock returns. The results are that the stock market appears to have ignored the 1977 announcement, but rewarded the 1990 event. Future research and possible managerial implications are discussed.NGCorporation ; Ethics ; Investment ; Management ; Society ; Stock Market M 96 English 1996YLX\WT4-A New Model of Business: Dual-Investor TheorySchlossberger, Eugene Business Ethics Quarterlye44459-474s 1052-150XThe paper suggests replacing the shareholder/ stakeholder distinction with a "Dual- Investor" model of business: stockowners provide the specific capital for business ventures, while society provides the "opportunity capital." Thus society is an investor in every business venture. Dual- Investor theory provides a response (based purely on the ethics of investment) to Milton Friedman's arguments that executives should maximize profit by any legal means, avoids recent criticisms by Kenneth Goodpaster and Thomas McMahon, and suggests that the dichotomy between private and public ownership overlooks several important alternatives. Some consequences of the theory are detailed and a sketch of a theory of property, based on Dual- Investor theory, is appended.B;Corporation ; Ethics ; Investment ; Morality ; Stockholders O 94 English 1994NGThe Middle Path: Using Dual-Investor Theory in Teaching Business EthicsSchlossberger, EugeneTeaching Business Ethics22127-136 1382-6891g<5Graduates of business ethics courses often fail to apply what they have learned to decisions in business life because, this study finds, neither stakeholder theory nor shareholder-oriented theories seem satisfactory--less than 7% of respondents felt either view achieved the best balance between social responsibility and making a profit. Dual-Investor theory offers students a framework within which to articulate and think through the ethical dimensions of business decisions, a framework 77.8% of respondents overall and 82.1% of business students claimed they were most likely to use in making their own decisions. The paper provides three sample cases illustrating the instructional advantages of Dual-Investor theory and points out several ways instructors might use Dual-Investor theory in business ethics courses.D>Business Ethics; Education ; Investment ; Teaching Friedman, M 1998 English 1998105049740*Tobacco: No more excuses for pension fundsSchueth, SteveWORD COUNT: 994Pensions & Investments Feb 3 199712253According to the report, Tobacco's Changing Context, from the Social Investment Forum and Co-op America, institutional investors will find themselves under growing pressure in 1997 to reconsider investment policies concerning tobacco. Many institutional investors will probably be surprised by the data in the report showing tobacco stocks have experienced erratic performance in recent years. Unreliable performance numbers mean that investing in tobacco stocks can cause ERISA headaches for institutional investors. The tobacco industry is getting to the point where it may not be able to dodge many more of the bullets that have been aimed at it over the years. The overall fortunes of the tobacco industry took a sharp downturn in 1996.jdUS Pension funds Institutional investments Tobacco industry Investment policy Social investing ERISA089382020)Socially screened funds enjoy huge growths Steve Schueth$WORD COUNT: 1095@9National Underwriter; Life, health/financial services ed. Mar 27 2000 8-10 104E13>7Recent rapid growth in socially screened investing is great news for investors who will have ever-increasing options for investing according to their values. It is also great news for society at large, since the rise of screened funds fosters greater corporate accountability on social and environmental issues.B;United States; US Social investing Corporate responsibilitySchueth, Steve 2003:3Socially responsible investing in the United Statese&Journal of Business Ethics; JBE0433e 189-94 Mar\01674544on file.PIUnited States Studies Social responsibility Investments Growth industries$Socially responsible investing (SRI) has emerged in recent years as a dynamic and quickly growing segment of the U.S. financial services industry involving over $2 trillion in professionally managed assets. This paper provides an overview of the breadth and depth of the concept and practice of socially and environmentally responsible investing, describes the investment strategies that together define SRI as currently practiced in the U.S., offers several observations about some of the factors fueling its dramatic growth, and presents data showing that investors who choose to invest in a socially and environmentally responsible manner can do so without giving up investment returns. SRI has matured to a point where virtually any investment need can be met through portfolio design that integrates an investor's personal values, institutional mission, and/or social priorities. One intriguing example of the ongoing development of the field can be found in the analysis of the language used to describe it. The terms social investing, socially responsible investing, ethical investing, socially aware investing, socially conscious investing, green investing, values-based investing, and mission-based or mission-related investing all refer to the same general process and are often used interchangeably.WORD COUNT: 2797aBSolomon, Robert 1999>7Game Theory as a Model for Business and Business EthicsT Business Ethics Quarterly91 11-29 on file"Game Theory Business EthicsCritiques game thoery applied to business ethics. "To put the matter quite crudely, a person who actually practiced the form of 'rationality' advocated by game thoery would be something of a monster'.Sparkes, Russell 2001:3Ethical Investment: Whose Ethics, Which Investment?Business Ethicse103\194-2050 0962-8770ron file$Ethics Investment StakeholderEthical or socially responsible investment (SRI) is one of the most rapidly growing areas of finance. New government regulations mean that all pension funds are obliged to take such considerations into account. However, this phenomenon has received little critical attention from business ethicists, and a clear conceptual framework is lacking. This paper, by a practitioner in the field, attempts to fill this analytical gap. It considers what difference, if any, lies between the terms 'ethical', 'green', or 'socially responsible'. It also tackles the difficult question of how any public form of investment can be called 'ethical' in an overtly pluralistic society. (edited) Jl 01 English0471499536 (alk. paper)1Sparkes, Russell<5Socially responsible investment : a global revolution New York J. Wiley 2002 xxii, 399k UKSIP series2002027205 Russell Sparkes. Includes bibliographical references and index. Foreword / Pt. I. Exploring Socially Responsible Investment -- 1. Socially Responsible Investment Comes of Age -- 2. What Is Socially Responsible Investment? -- 3. From the Beginning -- 4. Profiling the Investors -- 5. Screening in Practice -- Pt. II. Issues for Institutional Investors -- 6. From Environmental Risks ... -- 7. ... To Sustainable Development -- 8. Human Rights -- 9. Corporate Social Responsibility -- 10. Investment Returns -- Pt. III. A Global Revolution -- 11. Information Services -- 12. Alternative Approaches: Canada and Australia -- 13. Into the Mainstream -- 14. A Global Revolution."Over the past decade, socially responsible investment (SRI) has changed from being a niche market to become a core consideration for mainstream investors. As such, pension fund advisers, trustees of charitable foundations and other investment professionals want to understand this new phenomenon. Up to now they have lacked any reference book to teach them what they need to know about SRI. This gap is now filled by the publication of Socially Responsible Investment: A Global Revolution, the first book on SRI specifically written for investment professionals and their clients. The book will also help business executives and business schools looking at better corporate governance and business ethics."--BOOK JACKET.o,&Investments Moral and ethical aspects.<6http://www.loc.gov/catdir/toc/wiley031/2002027205.html<5QGU GoldCoast HG4515.13 .S63 2002 DUE: 10/01/05 17:00a*$Russell Sparkes Christopher J Cowton 2004|uThe Maturing Of Socially Responsible Investment: A Review Of The Developing Link With Corporate Social Responsibilityp&Journal of Business Ethics; JBE521 45-57 Jun 01674544on fileb[Studies Business ethics Corporate responsibility Social investing Institutional investmentsThis paper reviews the development of socially responsible investment (SRI) over recent years and highlights the prospects for an increasingly strong connection with the practice of corporate social responsibility. The paper argues that not only has SRI grown significantly, it has also matured. In particular, it has become an investment philosophy adopted by a growing proportion of large investment institutions. This shift in SRI from margin to mainstream and the position in which institutional investors find themselves is leading to a new form of SRI shareholder pressure. Although this bears some resemblance to lobbying campaigns which might take advantage of shareholder rights, we seek to distinguish it as an important phenomenon in its own right - one to which corporate executives are likely to be paying increasing attention in the years to come. We further argue that this approach potentially meets some of the earlier ethical criticisms of certain forms of SRI but, ironically, probably owes its existence to those pioneering approaches. We conclude with some suggestions for further research to inform discussion of the issues highlighted in the paper. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]WORD COUNT: 9071HAEthical Business and Investment: A Model for Business and SocietySpiller, Rodgers Journal of Business Ethics27 1-2149-160 0167-4544Two key questions lie at the heart of the business challenge for business ethics: is it possible for business and investors to do well while doing good; and if so, how can this be achieved? This paper adopts an international investment perspective to address these questions. It demonstrates that it is possible for business and investors to achieve a triple bottom line of environmental, social and financial performance. (edited)<6Business Ethics; Ethics ; Investment ; Model ; Society S 00 English 2000 L | ProfessionalcProfessional Ethics Profitmen Promotion Propertya Protectionera proxy votinga Psychiatry(< Psychology Publiceet Public GoodPublic InterestFPublic opinions Public Policy Punishmentnal Quinn, WJRates of returng0 Ratingsen Rationality Realismvi Reasonne Reformsia Regan, Ti Regionalism.l Regulationmit Repurchase Researchn Resource Responsibility Responsible$!responsible investment initiativeRight RightseenRiskorisk managementRoleeRulesRule UtilitarianismScarce Medical Resource Scepticismyy Schizophrenia Scienceen Scientist ScreeningSECreSelf Deceptionsm0 Self Interest Self Referral Shareholdershareholder activismShareholder relationsShareholder resolutionsYShareholders wealthty Sirgy, Mb SocialsibSocial accountingSocial change.psocial concernsiv Social impactSocial investing0Social movements. Social PhilwsSocial PhilosophySocial Responsibility0-Social responsibility of business Congresses. Socialism$socially responsble investment Societyib Solomon, Rlit South AfricanSpace Specieseo Speciesism(< Spier, Ra Spira, H Spiritism SpiritualitytSRIanSRI background SRI funds SRI industry SRI research Stakeholder<stakeholder managementnsi Stakeholdersn Standardx Standards Status Ph Stephenson, WStock Stock Market Stockholdersstockmarket reactionsStrategic planning.͐ StudiesKi Subjectivity Suffering Summenhart, CsuperannuationsustainabilitySustainable development$ Sustainable development Finance.0Sustainable development. SystemThe Taverns (Inns) Accounting.(< Taxationo Teachingl Technologypon Teleology Testinge Thailand Theoryyti TobaccostTobacco industryv Toxicology(< Tradingen TraditionTransplantationTreee Trendsof triple bottom lineTrustUKite Unconscious UNEP FIZUnited Kingdom0 United StatesUniversal owners UniversitiesaUSiteUsuryUtilitarianismy UtilityriValue valuesics VegetarianismVicel Violation Virtueyib Virtue.. Virtues. Vivisectionvoluntary approachespWarli Wealthsib WelfareRiwelfare economics WishingenWorld Trade Organization.X dXenotransplantation2TxRisser, David T. 1996RLThe Social Dimension of Moral Responsibility: Taking Organizations Seriously"Journal of Social Philosophy271189-207\ 0047-2786 paper on file<5Ethics Harm Moral Responsibility Organization SocietypjThis article provides a justification for holding complex organizations morally responsible and shows how this moral dimension is implicit in the concept of power. Several objections to organizational moral responsibility are addressed and a new view of complex organizations as agents which are morally responsible, but do not possess moral rights, is defended.Spr 96 EnglishRivoli, Pietra 2003f_Making a Difference or Making a Statement? Finance Research and Socially Responsible Investmentg Business Ethics Quarterlye133t271-2872 1052-150Xo@9Ethics Finance Investment Research Responsibility SocietyPJMy objective in this paper is to apply mainstream finance research findings to the question of whether socially responsible investing may be expected to lead to superior social outcomes. I conclude that under the perfect markets assumptions underlying most finance theory, socially responsible investing will not affect social outcomes. However, given well-documented imperfections in equity markets, the claim that socially responsible investing 'makes a difference" to society is a reasonable one that is consistent with current theoretical and empirical research in finance. (edited) Jl 03 EnglishRivoli, Pietra 2003B;Labor standards in the global economy: Issues for investorsg&Journal of Business Ethics; JBE433 223 Mar01674544 paper on fileRKStudies Social responsibility Investments Labor standards Clothing industryIn the mid-1990s, global labour standards emerged as a new and important are of concern for socially responsible investors, especially with respect to investments in the "problematic" footwear, apparel, and toy industries. In this paper, I elucidate the primary areas of concern for investors and discuss a framework for evaluating firms' labor standards performance. In addition, I argue that today's sweatshop debates follow closely those of centuries ago, with the standard economic defense of low wage manufacturing on the one hand, and the activists' protests against poor conditions and wages on the other. An examination of this historical context reveals a promising middle ground in this ongoing debate. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]2WORD COUNT: 5252ngThink Globally, Punish Locally: Nonstate Actors, Multinational Corporations, and Human Rights SanctionsRodman, Kenneth A.& Ethics and International Affairs12 19-41 0892-6794^XThis article poses the question of whether grassroots organizations can provide an alternative center of authority to the state in inducing multinational corporations to incorporate human rights criteria in their investment and trade decisions. In examining the antiapartheid movement and attempts to replicate it in the 1990s in the campaigns against corporate involvement in Myanmar and Nigeria, it presents a mixed picture. In each case, citizen pressures increased the costs and risks of "business as usual" with target states and induced corporations to either undertake social responsibility obligations or to disengage beyond what was required either by national regulations or market forces. At the same time, nonstate sanctions are limited by the fact that (a) they can induce but, unlike the state, cannot command corporate behavior, (b) their success is dependent upon state policies which are at least partially reinforce their aims, and (c) municipal procurement power--the most costly pressure on multinationals--has been predominantly a U.S. phenomenon because of its decentralized federal system.LEEthics ; Global ; Human Rights; Multinational Corporation; Punishment 1998 English 1998`ZThe Frankenstein Syndrome: Ethical and Social Issues in the Genetic Engineering of Animals$Rollin, Bernard E. Coxon, AmyhEthics and Medicine143f 90-91 0226-688X:31998 Cambridge-Univ-Pr : New York, 1995 Book-Review 1995 Rose, Jamesa 2001D=Ethical & Active Shareholding: An Australian Investor's Guide Elsternwick, Victoria  Wrightbooks HG5892 .R67 2001 (Nathan)some pages on filejcAustralia shareholder activism social concerns Institutional investments institutional shareholders A66682129 Rosen, Robert ,%Put your money where your morality is16/Habitat Australia0310-2939Oct 2000, v28 i5, p28 A11781236haSocial issues and socially responsible investment behavior: a preliminary empirical investigationtable chart illustration6/Rosen, Barry N. Sandler, Dennis M. Shani, DavidHBJournal of Consumer Affairs0022-0078Winter 1991, v25, n2, p221(14) {+BlA,R0VOOf Spirit: Heidegger and Derrida on Metaphysics, Ethics, and National SocialismFryer, David RossInquiry391 21-44N 0020-174X"Derrida's reading of Heidegger in "Of Spirit" provides an excellent opportunity to assess the ethical and political value of each of their works. Derrida uncovers a slippage in Heidegger during the 1930s in which Heidegger forgot to forget' the dangers of the spirit' he had disavowed in "Being and Time". This reveals a substantial early investment in the national Socialist project from which Heidegger never adequately recovered. Even in his attempts to distance himself from his Nazi past, Heidegger was still caught up in a metaphysical, though not a racial-biological, gesture and while Heidegger may have written at the end of philosophy, it was an end never come. One cannot stop reading Heidegger on this account. Rather, one is all the more compelled to read him, and after him Derrida. In Derrida's reading of Heidegger, we see the ways in which Heidegger opened up for Derrida an alternative space for the ethical--in The call of Being' before any decision--in the obligation to the other. However, this ethical possibility of deconstruction is only a space of undecidability and questioning, never a space for political comportment; that is, it is ontological-existential, not ontical-existentiel. In this, while deconstruction opens up a space for ethics, it is never to guide, only to expose.F?Ethics ; Metaphysics ; Socialism ; Spirit Derrida, J; Heidegger Mr 96 English 1996&Garriga, Elisabet Mele, Domenecu 2004D>Corporate social responsiblity theories: mapping the territory Journal of Business Ethics53 51-71 paper on filetcorporate social responsibility corporate citizenship stakeholder management corporate social performance Sustainable development Common Good Gascoigne, ClaireV 20052,The Search for Value in Feel-Good InvestmentFinancial Times 3o4 April\on filel$ethics sustainability Moralityxrthe move from looking at ethical investment in terms of morality to terms of good corporate governance. The very term ethical investment is losing ground, particularly in a global economy where the definition varies from country to country. In the UK, an ethnically diverse workforce is seen as a 'good thing; in France, collecting data on the ethnic origin of employees is illegal. Think of women's rights in Europe and in the Middle east; the tw are very different. Child labour may be labelled 'bad' on one side of the world but be acceptable on the other. Faced with such disagreement, how can investors and fund managers decide? "Ethical is a very emotive word, one that institutional trustees tend to shy away from," says David Russell, of the Unviersities Superannauation Scheme. "Most institutional funds agree that investment decisions cannot be taken on the basis of moral judgements. We represent more than 200,000 individuals who may have a variety of views on alcohol or tobacco. But over the long term we believe it will protect the value of our investments if we focus on good corporate governance and good management."Value and Justification Gaus, G. F. Dreier, James  Ethics 102V1K164-166 0014-1704i:3O 91 Cambridge-Univ-Pr : New York, 1990 Book-Review6 1990(!Gelb, David S. Strawser, Joyce A.p 2001tnCorporate Social Responsibility and Financial Disclosures: An Alternative Explanation for Increased Disclosure Journal of Business Ethics331 1-13 0167-4544- paper on fileiB7Ethical Considerations in the Use of Transgenic AnimalsGiraud, RaymondBetween the Species10 1-2 55-60<6Animal ; Biology ; Ethics ; Health ; Medicine ; NazismWin-Spr 94 English 1994 A20048291Glickman, MarshallTNStock options; how to use your shares to change company environmental behaviorcartoon illustration0*E1046-8021July-August 1997, v8, n4, p44(4)*#Some Challenges of Social ScreeningGoodpaster, Kenneth E. Journal of Business Ethics433239-246 0167-4544The ultimate challenge with which we are presented in connection with social investing is no more and no less than this: enhancing the function of conscience in the modern global business corporation. As with individual conscience, however, corporate conscience can be influenced in two ways: from the inside and from the outside. Investment decisions provide external influences, while management values provide influence from the inside.6/Audit ; Ethics ; Investing ; Screening ; SocialMr III 03 English 20022Xl|1F?Vulture Investors, Predators of the 90s: An Ethical ExaminationCarson, A. Scott Journal of Business Ethics175543-555 0167-4544Investment in financially distressed companies has taken place since the end of the depression. But a new breed of predatory activist investors called "vultures" has emerged in recent years. They take sizable debt positions in insolvent companies with the intention of significantly increasing the value of their investment through aggressive negotiation either in bankruptcy or in prebankruptcy restructurings. Predators thrive on adversarial conflict. Vulture investment is legal, but is it morally acceptable? This paper argues that the strategies and tactics of vultures may be very unpleasant, but in themselves these are insufficient grounds for moral censure.D=Behavior ; Censure ; Ethics ; Finance ; Investment ; Investor6 Ap 98 English 199814408880Crisis of conscience Adam CarswellWORD COUNT: 932Australian CPA Apr 2002 26-27_723Australian investors are increasingly looking to derive "guilt-free" returns from companies that mirror their own personal values and social concerns. Many are achieving this via alternatives such as ethical managed funds, and growing demand has seen almost every major financial institution launch their own ethical offerings in the past few years. Ethical investment funds are offering more competitive returns than in the past, but Australians are still not showing much interest.>7Australia Funds Social investing Rates of return TrendsZT0122270665 (V.1) 0122270673 (V.2) 0122270681 (V.3) 012227069X (V.4) 0122270657 (set)$Encyclopedia of applied ethics  San Diego Academic Press 1998 4 v.97074395 [editor-in-chief, Ruth Chadwick]. Applied ethics Includes bibliographical references. v. 1. A-D -- v. 2. E-I -- v. 3. J-R -- v. 4. S-Z, Index.$Applied ethics Encyclopedias.1Chadwick, Ruth F. QGU GoldCoast Ref BJ63 .E44 1998 In Library V.4 QGU Nathan Ref BJ63 .E44 1998 In Library V.1 QGU Nathan Ref BJ63 .E44 1998 In Library V.2 QGU Nathan Ref BJ63 .E44 1998 In Library V.3 QGU Nathan Ref BJ63 .E44 1998 In Library V.4HBEthicists As Architects: Revising Moral Theory Using All the ToolsChambers, Jean*$Philosophy in the Contemporary World91U 27-38 1077-1999m<5As James Coleman and Allan Gibbard have suggested, human morality may be viewed as a feedback control system. Each of the standard normative ethical theories emphasizes only part of this complex system. Social reform requires both new theoretical syntheses and a practical effort to better uphold ideal norms.F?Ethicist ; Ethics ; Moral Theory; System Coleman, J; Gibbard, ASpr-Sum 02 English 2002Chitsomboon, Ployl 20052,MFC Plans First 'Social Responsibility' FundKnight Ridder Tribune\  Washington1e# Business News 4 June Filed under C Thailand Asian SRI funds"first SRI fund for Thailand  Christian-Aid 2004HABehind the Mask: The Real Face of Corporate Social Responsibilityl  Christian Aid{ 21 January$Behind the mask: The real face of CSR Unmasking CSR Sustained misery: Shell in the Niger Delta Hooked on tobacco: BAT in Kenya Living its values: Coca-Cola in India From CSR to corporate social accountabilityon fileJCCSR corporate social responsibility voluntary approaches Regulation"CSR as a branch of PR. CSR used as a way for business to avoid mandatory international regulation CSR born during 1992 Earth Summit - recommendations on regulation rejected in favour of a manifesto for voluntary self-regulation. Definition of CSR: an entirely voluntary, corporate-led initiative to promote self-regulation as a substitute for regulation at either national or international level. CSR is a catch-all term increasingly used by business, which encompasses the volunatry codes, principles and intiatives companies adopt in tehir general desire to confine corporate responsibility to self-regulation. US Alien Torts Calims Act (ATCA) - used with some success to hold US companies to account for their activities overseas. Almost a third of MBAs in Europe have CSR modules. MNCs - in 1970 there were 7000, in 2003 there were about 63,000 parent copanies operating with about 69,000 subsidiaries . IN 2000, foreign direct investment exceeded $1.3 trillion. No coincidence that companies in some of the more controversial sectors - oil, mining, tobacco - have all been quick to champion CSR. Case studies - Shell in Nigeria, tobacco workers, Coke in India. Recommendations for regulations. 10 reasons to regulate60http://www.christian-aid.org.uk/indepth/0401csr/"007707856X (pbk. alk. paper)$Essentials of business ethics New York McGraw-Hill Book Co. 1996xi, 20195050989 George Chryssides and John Kaler. Includes bibliographical references (p. 194-195) and index. 1. What Is Business Ethics? -- 2. Ethical Theory -- 3. Business and Justice -- 4. Responsibility and Business -- 5. Employment -- 6. Finance and Investment -- 7. The Ethics of Advertising -- 8. Green Issues in Business -- 9. Ethics and International Business -- 10. How to be Ethical.Business ethics.*$Chryssides, George D. Kaler, John H.XRQGU GoldCoast HF5387 .C488 1996 In Library QGU Nathan HF5387 .C488 1996 In LibraryZ:40072314052 (acid-free paper) 0072314052 (alk. paper)Hartman, Laura Pincus &Perspectives in business ethics3 2nd  Boston, Mass.  McGraw-Hill 2002 xvii, 8113 2001030195 Laura P. Hartman. Includes bibliographical references and index. Pt. 1. Ethical Theories and Approaches -- Ch. 1. Traditional Theories -- Leviathan / Of the State of Nature / Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals / The Ten Commandments, Exodus 20: 1-17 / When Justice Replaces Affection: The Need for Rights / Utilitarianism / Some Problems of Utilitarianism / The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas / Aristotelian Ethics / Distributive Justice / The Entitlement Theory / Closing Argument in Leopold and Loeb Case / Whenever I Need to Do Some Serious Thinking..., / Ch. 2. Application of Traditional Theories to Modern Business Decision Making -- It Seems Right in Theory but Does It Work in Practice? / The Art of War / Some Thoughts on the Meaning of Business Ethics / America's Persecuted Minority: Big Business / The One-Minute Moralist / Is Business Bluffing Ethical? / Profit: Some Moral Reflections / The Ideas of Ayn Rand / The Divine Right of Capital: Is Maximizing Returns to Shareholders a Legitimate Mandate? / Psychoethics / Pondering Prometheus / Venturing beyond Compliance / The Constitution and ServiceMaster's First Company Objective / Ch. 3. Individual Decision Making: Lessons Learned from the Foundations -- Careful Decision Making / Quiz Yourself on Business Ethics / Morality: The Basic Rules / The Real Life of a Student: Term Papers for Sale / The Good Samaritan, Luke 10:30-37 / Should Ethics Be Taught in College? / Obedience to Authority / The Day Hans Come ... to Take an Accounting of My Life -- Ch. 4. Critical Ethical Analysis Based on an Understanding of Perceptual Differences: A Decision-Making Model -- A Stakeholder Theory of The Modern Corporation / The Parable of the Sadhu / The Rashomon Effect / A Jury of Her Peers / Where and Why Did Business Ethicists Go Wrong? The Case of Dow Corning Corporation / Just Because It's Legal, Is It Ethical? / Ch. 5. Ethics and Corporate Social Responsibility: One and the Same? -- The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits / Arguments for the against Corporate Social Responsibility / The Wealth of Nations / Maximizing Ethics and Profits / Smith and Friedman on the Pursuit of Self-Interest and Profit / Dodge v. Ford Motor Co / How Business Can Be Good (and Why Being Good is Good for Business) / A Hanging / Reputation Quotient: Surveys Find Many Consumers Hold Companies Responsible for Their Actions -- Transformation at Shell: Commerce and Citizenship / Ch. 6. Corporate Strategy and Decision Making: Accountability -- Profitable Ethical Programs / Moral Leadership and Business Ethics / Topic Study: Federal Sentencing Guidelines -- The Prince / Ethical Dilemmas Regarding Competitive Intelligence / Airline Travel: Safety at What Price? / Topic Study: Space Pt. 1. Ethical Theories and Approaches. Ch. 1. Traditional Theories. Leviathan / Of the State of Nature / Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals / The Ten Commandments, Exodus 20: 1-17 / When Justice Replaces Affection: The Need for Rights / Utilitarianism / Some Problems of Utilitarianism / The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas / Aristotelian Ethics / Distributive Justice / The Entitlement Theory / Closing Argument in Leopold and Loeb Case / Whenever I Need to Do Some Serious Thinking..., / Ch. 2. Application of Traditional Theories to Modern Business Decision Making. It Seems Right in Theory but Does It Work in Practice? / The Art of War / Some Thoughts on the Meaning of Business Ethics / America's Persecuted Minority: Big Business / The One-Minute Moralist / Is Business Bluffing Ethical? / Profit: Some Moral Reflections / The Ideas of Ayn Rand / The Divine Right of Capital: Is Maximizing Returns to Shareholders a Legitimate Mandate? / Psychoethics / Pondering Prometheus / Venturing beyond Compliance / The Constitution and ServiceMaster's First Company Objective / Ch. 3. Individual Decision Making: Lessons Learned from the Foundations. Careful Decision Making / Quiz Yourself on Business Ethics / Morality: The Basic Rules / The Real Life of a Student: Term Papers for Sale / The Good Samaritan, Luke 10:30-37 / Should Ethics Be Taught in College? / Obedience to Authority / The Day Hans Come ... to Take an Accounting of My Life -- Ch. 4. Critical Ethical Analysis Based on an Understanding of Perceptual Differences: A Decision-Making Model. A Stakeholder Theory of The Modern Corporation / The Parable of the Sadhu / The Rashomon Effect / A Jury of Her Peers / Where and Why Did Business Ethicists Go Wrong? The Case of Dow Corning Corporation / Just Because It's Legal, Is It Ethical? / Ch. 5. Ethics and Corporate Social Responsibility: One and the Same? The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits / Arguments for the against Corporate Social Responsibility / The Wealth of Nations / Maximizing Ethics and Profits / Smith and Friedman on the Pursuit of Self-Interest and Profit / Dodge v. Ford Motor Co / How Business Can Be Good (and Why Being Good is Good for Business) / A Hanging / Reputation Quotient: Surveys Find Many Consumers Hold Companies Responsible for Their Actions. Transformation at Shell: Commerce and Citizenship / Ch. 6. Corporate Strategy and Decision Making: Accountability. Profitable Ethical Programs / Moral Leadership and Business Ethics / Topic Study: Federal Sentencing Guidelines. The Prince / Ethical Dilemmas Regarding Competitive Intelligence / Airline Travel: Safety at What Price? / Topic Study: Space Shuttle Challenger Disaster. Ch. 7. Corporate Strategy and Decision Making: Corporate Culture and Reputation Management. Managing Ethics and Legal Compliance: What Works and What HBusiness ethics.rkQGU GoldCoast HF5387 .H3744 2002 In Library QGU MtGravatt On Order QGU Nathan HF5387 .H3744 2002 In Library +* pFess, Philip E.Fiedler, TerryFiet, James O. Filbeck, GregFinsen, Lawrence Finsen, SusanFischer, FrankFlynn, Patricia C.  Foegen, J. H. Forum', 'Social InvestmentForum, Social InvestmentFrancis, Ronald D.  Fraser, BruceFrech, J. ClaytonFreeman, PeterFreeman, SamuelFreer, Jack P.French, WarrenFrewer, Lynn J. Frey, R. G.*Frost, Frederick A. Frost, GeoffFryer, David Ross Gardner, JohnGarriga, ElisabetGascoigne, Claire Gaus, G. F.*Gay, George R.Gelb, David S. George, Rolf Gerrans, PaulGiddens, AnthonyGiraud, RaymondGlickman, Marshall  Gold, MartinGoodin, SusannaGoodpaster, Kenneth E.(+LGoslings, Jan H. W. Gould, CaroleGraves, Samuel BGreene, TimothyGreenfield, W MGriffin, Ricky W.Group, BT Financial Group, The Allen ConsultingGuay, Terrence Gunther, MarcHaigh, MatthewHardiman, MichaelHarman, GilbertHarrison, FayeHarrison, Jeffrey S.Hartman, Laura PincusHassett, Kevin Hawken, PaulHawley, James P.Hazelton, James Heinze, David Heitler, W.* Hely, Susan*Henderson, Hazel Henwood, Doug Hess, David*Hettinger, Edwin C.Hildyard, NicholasHill Jr, Thomas E.  Hoggett, Jim Holmes, Doug$Homer Vanniasinkam, ShervanthiHuberman Arnold, Diane(+L Hutton, WillD?Institute of Chartered Financial Analysts. Research Foundation. Institute, Natural CapitalIntrocaso, David M.Irvine, William B. Jagels, MartinJamieson, DaleJeucken, MarcelJohnsen, D BruceJohnsen, D. BruceJohnson, Robert R.  Jones, Alan* Jonker, JanJosselin, DaphneJouni, KorhonenJoyner, Brenda E. Kaler, John*Kaler, John H. Kamm, F. M.*Kamp, Jurriaan Kapelus, Paul Keefe, JoeKeeps, Erica J.King, Roger J. H.Klaasen, Johann A. Klinger, ScottKlotzko, Arlene Judith(+LKnoll, Michael S. Knowles, Ross Kohls, John* Kolers, AveryKopelman, Loretta M.Kracher, BeverlyKrausz, JoshuaKristoffersen, IngebjorgKrumsiek, Barbara Kuehn, ScottKujala, Johanna Kurtz, D. L.Kushner, Thomasine Laan, Sandra van derLaFollette, Hugh Lam, Kit ChunLandesman, Cliff Langley, GillLaufer, William SLeung, Philomena Lewer, John* Lewis, Alan*Lewis, Michael Li, Hon Lam*Liaw, K. ThomasLiedtka, JeanneLittle, MatthewLloyd, Geoffrey E. R.Loftin, Robert W.Lomasky, Loren E.Loucks, Orie L.Louwers, Timothy J.Lydenberg, Steven D.MacDonalad, G. JeffreyMacDougall, Alan Macer, DarrylMackenzie, CraigMaignan, Isabelle Makower, JoelMalhotra, Naresh K. Malone, DavidMalotky, Daniel JamesMandondo, AloisManheim, JarolMani, Vasudevan Mansley, MarkMarkham Thompson, Maria Marshall, BevMarshall, Jane Martin, Roger Mathew, Ryan Mays, ShaunMcCullough, LaurenceMcDonald, Cherrie McEwan, Tom*McGuire, NicolaMcLachlan, JonathanMcMillan, G. Steven Mele, Domenec Mendus, SusanMichelson, GrantMiller, Gina L.Miller, Robert A.Millington, Andrew  Mills, Julie MistraMollner, Terry Monks, Robert Moore, GeoffMorreim, E. HaaviMorris, ChristopherMoseley, R. A. Y.MPIxTaylor, Robert 2001$Putting Ethics into InvestmentBusiness Ethicsf101 53-60m 0962-87700on file;B;Business Ethics Corporation Ethics Investment Moral Theory60The article sets out to consider the practice of ethical investment in the light of some basic principles of moral philosophy. After establishing some principles which have been applied to individual or social conduct, it reviews the application of ethics to business, and the precedents established for investment. Because of the links between ethical investment and single-issue campaigning, there is a detailed consideration of the relationship between campaigning groups and the issues they are concerned with on the one hand, and ethical investment on the other. The conclusion is reached that ethical investment is as much a process as a series of specific aims, and that a diversified ethical fund must consider matters in the round, within the scope of current knowledge, and must avoid an absolutist agenda.Argues for compromise and moderation. importance of facts. asserts ethical contradictions of campaigners. negative views of campaigners. advocates an approach of fighting against the greatest and most urgent evils rhater than for ultimate greatest good.tTaylor, Robert 2002$Science and Ethical InvestmentBusiness Ethicsa1114 77-85n 0962-8770 on filet0*Ethics Evidence History Investment ScienceThe article explores the relationship between science and ethical investment, which is often concerned with the application of science and technology through commercial organizations. The article considers the contribution that scientific understanding makes to ethical investment, and the way in which ethical investment can improve the public perception of science. It then goes on to consider the historical relationship between science and society and the lessons that might be learned from scientific study in developing a methodology for ethical investment. The conclusion reached is that scientific understanding provides the bedrock for many of the concerns which arise in ethical investment, as well as providing an indication of the nature of the research involved. Ja 02 English  TECXQ"Ethical? investment": Summary of TEC report into socially responsible investmentr Total Environment Centre paper on file0)socially responsble investment assessmentmvuJ The-Economisto 200560Leaders: The Good Company; Capitalism and Ethics The Economist; 374i 84109l 22 Januaryon file\2,Corporate responsibility Business Ethics SRI<6The one thing that all the nostrums of CSR have in common is that they are based on a afaulty - and dangerously faulty - analysis of the capitalist system they are intended to redeem. Simply put, advocates of CSR work from the premise that unadorned capitalism fails to serve the public interest. The goal of a well-run company may be to make profits for its shareholders, but merely in doing that - iprovided it faces competition in its markets, behaves honestly and obeys the law - the comapny, without even trying, is doing good works. Its employees willingly work for the comapny in wcchange for wages; the transaction makes them better off. Its customers willingly pay for the comapny's products; the transaction makes them better off also. All the while, for stricly selfish reasons, well-run companies will strive for friendly long=term relations with employees, suppliers and customers. There is no need for selfless sacrifice when it comes to stakeholders. It goes with the territory. For instance, in the name of socially responsoble conduct ...some multanational firms ahve rpoudly withdrawn from investments in devleoping countries where labour practices fall far short of western standards. This si a pernicious kind of benevolence. ...as a rule it will harm the people it is supposedly intended to help: the people in the poor coutnries concerned, who would have benefited either form employment at higher-than-prevailing wages or from the knock-on economic effects of inward investment. ...there is much to be said for leaving social and economic policy to governments.$Tippet, John Leung, Philomena 2001B;Defining ethical investment and its demography in Australia,"Australian Accounting Review113  44-55i filed{2,demography Gender History Consumer attitudes\U'ethical' investors - more females, younger, better educated than standard investors.# Tippet, John 2001.(Performance of Australia's ethical funds$The Australian Economic Review342i 170-8i paper on file@9History Australian investment funds Financial performancee A78480824 Topp, GarrySRI: value from virtue`YJASSA: the Journal of the Securities Institute of Australia0313-5934Winter 2001 i2, p6(4) A100751516 Topp, Garry.&Living up to the promise of SRIU`ZJASSA: the Journal of the Securities Institute of Australia0313-5934Autumn 2002 i1, p12(3) A13208245Torrens, Paul R.&When social responsibility pays4.America0002-7049July 17, 1993, v169, n2, p5(1)`Z031222656X (St. Martin's cloth) 0333716841 (Macmillan cloth) 0333716841 031222656X (cloth)LEProspects in trade, investment, and business in Vietnam and East Asia New York St. Martin's Press 2000 xviii, 24899037581 edited by Tran Van Hoa. Includes bibliographical references and index. Foreword / 1. Trade, Investment and Business in Vietnam: An Overview / 2. Trends and Prospects for Trade, Investment and Business in Vietnam / 3. Amended Law on Foreign Investment and Investment Priorities during the period 1996-2000 in Vietnam / 4. Promotion of Trade, Investment and Business in Vietnam / 5. The Business Environment for Australian Companies in Vietnam / 6. Australia's Trade with East Asia: Opportunities with Vietnam / 7. The Mekong Basin Subregion / 8. Human Resource Development Issues and Priorities in Vietnam: Implications for International Business / 9. Business Ethics and Foreign Enterprises in Vietnam / 10. Environmental Regulation and Standards: Implications for trade in Vietnam / 11. South Korea's Economic Growth, Trade and Development: Contemporary Problems and prospects / 12. General Comments and Conclusions /Investments, Foreign Vietnam. Foreign trade promotion Vietnam. Investments, Foreign East Asia. Foreign trade promotion East Asia. Tran, Van HoaZTQGU Logan HG5750.5.A3 P76 2000 In Library QGU Nathan HG5750.5.A3 P76 2000 In Libraryx  The-Allen-Consulting-Group 20002,Socially Responsible Investment in Australia  Melbourne The Allen Consulting Groupon file{.(socially responsble investment AustraliaConceptual overview of SRI with the objective of identifying how the market might be advanced in Australia - review of literature, interviews, mail survey of Australian investment community. (1) Working definition used: SRI can be defined as the integration of an individual's investment objectives with his/her commitment to social concerns such as social justice, economic development, peace or a healthy environment. (UK Social Investment Forum) (1) Using the term 'ethical' is seen by some proponents as working against wider understanding and acceptance. Can imply that an advocate has the 'high moral ground' and the term connotes a philosophical message and technique that may be obscure to some. (10) 3 key strategies of social investing: Screening, Shareholder advocacy/activism, Community or cause-based investment. (10) History: has existed for centuries. Some of first recorded evidence - 17th century in US - Quakers decided not to invest in war or slave trade. 1920s - religious convictions - screened out tobacco and alcohol investment. Late 70s - concept of SI began attracting considerably larger group of investors, due in part to concerns about apartheid in S. Africa. During 1980s and 1990s, environmental issues such as Exxon Valdez oil spill, Chernobyl, other environmental accidents, global warming, ozone hole - became important for investors. Also tobacco and armaments and nuclear power companies fell out of favour. (11) Australia - lagged behind many overseas markets. A niche market. But now becoming a serious alterantive to 'socially-neutral' investments. (11) International trends: US most advanced wrt extent of development of SRI sector. Social Investment Forum - biannual report on SRI sector in US. trends: (1) SRI indexes have consistently outperformed S&P 500, (2) more employers are offering SRI options and employees moving assets into them. Themes investors seek in SRI are growing in number. Wider focus than Australian. (12) Level of public commentary is greater on SRI. UK - screened investments showed rapid grower during late 1990s. Canada also. Figures.(6) Australia: lagged uptake. Not until second half of 1980s did managed funds becme more widely available. Has been constrained by absence of wholesale players providing options to investors. The only options available have been either direct investment in shares or via retail funds. SRI estimated to be about $1 billion. Does not include various categories. The wealth of not-for-profit bodies, such as churches, foundations and universities may be about $20 billion - major potential source for advance of SRI. (14) Provides table of corporate shares within managed funds (2000). Source ABS managed funds. SRI funds only 0.7% of equities in managed funds. US - 13%. (15) Trends: likely to see a split in the sector along 2 lines: those with more traditional views about what SRI should be - hard-line views, and those with more pragmatic approach keen to make SRI more accessible to the concerned mainstream investor. (18) Fund managers in Australia: small number have been active for some time - Hunter Hall, Tower Asset Management (formerly Friends Provident) and Australian Ethical Investment. Challenger - more recent entrants. Westpac recently released Asutralian Eco Share Fund. (21) Negative screens: 88% of mutual fund managers use 3 or more screens. 96% tobacco, 86% gambling, 83% alcohol, 81% weapons, 79% environment, 43% human rights, 38% labour, 23% birth control & abortion, 15% animal welfare. (24) Exclusion on basis of negative screen may be complicated by the fact that many companies are engaged in a range of activities, only some of which may be considered 'unethical'. E.g major retailer may be considered by most as a suitable company, but strict application of negative screens would see them excluded for selling alcohol or tobacco. Most build tolerance limits into negative screens. This caveat is particularly important in Australia because relatively small size of initial market and substantial proportion of resource based stocks means that screening cannot be too strict. Would substantially reduce the investable universe and hence under-diversity the portfolio - potentially increases risk and may attract a return penalty. (24) Positive screens: positive share selection and best-of-sector. Positive stock selection - stocks that 'do good'. (25) Argument for best-of-sector approach is that it offers and incentive for companies, even in traditionally ethically 'dubious' industries to improve their performance against SRI criteria. SRI purists consider it is only a 'least-worst' approach. (28) Performance: perceived poor performance of screen investments by mainstream financial analysts. Their thinking relates partly to experience and partly to the logic of the screening processes. Overseas research is beginning to counter this argument. (31) Domini 200 Social Index (DSI) is the established benchmark for measuring the impact of social screening on financial performance in the US. launched in May 1990, first benchmark for US equity portfolios subject to multiple social screens. (33) Dow Jones Sustainability Group Index (DJSGI) - comprises selection of 229 'sustainable' companies from largest 2000 companies in DJGlobal Index, spanning 68 industries and 22 countries. (33) Way Forward Language: language used may have been a contributing factor to the slow take-up rate of SRI. (4) Fiduciary responsibility: need to overcome concerns about break of fiduciary responsibilities through advocacy of SRI. Perception of poor performance. Reason for lack of wholesale institution involvement. (49) Performance Investor demand: low levels of financial literacy generally among investing public. (50) Defining ethical parameters: concern by some managers that by providing an ethical alterantive they implicitly brand their non-screened funds as 'unethical'. Providing a screened fund may also leave them open to criticism from people who don't believe their fund is sufficiently 'ethical' or doesn't remain 'true to name'. (51) Australian market size: some believe Australian equity market is too small to screen out companies. SRI in Australia is on the verge of a transition from being a niche player to having a place in the mainstream. (55)nies from the investment portfolio; fructification-oriented ethics with a view to long-term investment; consequence-based ethics aimed at initiating a behavioral change in the investment target; and ethics envisaged as a discriminating criterion in the search of the best financial performance. No single formula of responsible investment is available, and the "responsible" approach necessarily implies the active involvement of a free acting subject striving to tackle fundamental ethical issues. (edited)>7Consequence ; Ethics ; Investment ; Responsible ; ValueD (I) 03 English 2003 $Deni-Green-Consulting-Services 2004:3Socially Responsible Investment in Australia - 2004S Sydney $Ethical Investment AssociationOctoberuon filelAustralia SRI FinanceJDhttp://www.eia.org.au/files/MNJLXB5Z5K/2004%20SRI%20benchmarking.pdf A76715336Derkley, KarinScreened for performancePersonal Investor!.'Photograph illustration Melbourne, Vic.("Poitras, Geoffreys 1994PJShareholder Wealth Maximization, Business Ethics and Social Responsibility Journal of Business Ethics132125-134 0167-4544,on file@9Business Ethics Ethics Responsibility Stockholders WealthzThe primary objective of this article is to develop a framework for analyzing the ethical foundations and implication of shareholder wealth maximization (SWM). Distinctions between SWM and the more widely examined construct of profit maximization are identified, the most significant being the central role played in SWM by the market mechanism for pricing the corporation's securities. It is argued that empirical tests concerned with evaluating the ethical implications of SWM will almost surely involve a joint hypothesis. A number of recent empirical studies aimed at testing hypotheses with explicit ethical content are reviewed. F 94 English(!Powell, Gary E. Weaver, Daniel G.t 19950)Do Investors Price Social Responsibility?\.(Business and Professional Ethics Journal143  61-77; 0277-2027{ paper on fileI:3Corporation Ethics Investing Responsibility SocietyFall 95 English%Prior Jonson, Elizabeth 20016/Paternalism and Corporate Social Responsibility<5Australian Journal of Professional and Applied Ethics 3p1  51-62r 1328-4576p paper on fileP:4Corporation Ethics Paternalism Social Responsibility 2001 English<5CSR--Should It be the Preserve of the Usual Suspects? Pryce, VickyBusiness Ethics112a140-142 0962-8770 CSR is now an important issue for all companies, large and small. Companies are under pressure to behave responsibly from their consumers, in their purchasing activities, from the government and regulators, from the investment community and from potential employees.B8Quarter, Jack Carmichael, Isla Sousa, Jorge Elgie, Susan 2001d]Social Investment by Union-Basd Pension Funds and Labour-Sponsored Investment Funds in Canada\Relations Industrielles 561a 92-115on file Pension funds SRI0310240026 (hardcover)F@Beyond integrity : a Judeo-Christian approach to business ethics 2nd Grand Rapids, Mich.B  Zondervan 2004 473 d ]2004010289 [edited by] Scott B. Rae and Kenman L. Wong. Includes bibliographical references and index. Pt. I. Foundations for Christian ethics in business -- Ch. 1. Christian ethics in business : tensions and challenges -- Is business bluffing ethical? / Why be honest if honesty doesn't pay? / Companies are discovering the value of ethics / Case 1.1. Borland's brave beginning -- Case 1.2. Keeping secrets -- Commentary -- Ch. 2. Christian engagement in business -- Christ and business : a typology for Christian business ethics / The entrepreneurial vocation / Tough business : in deep, swift waters / Case 2.1. Business as a calling -- Case 2.2. The assignment -- Commentary -- Ch. 3. Christian ethics for business : norms and benchmarks -- The Bible and culture in ethics / Business ethics / Pt. II. Ethics, corporations, and the global economy -- Ch. 4. Corporate social responsibility -- The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits / Business ethics and stakeholder analysis / A long term business perspective in a short term world : a conversation with Jim Sinegal / Case 4.1. Violent video games -- Case 4.2. Starbucks and fair trade coffee -- Commentary -- Ch. 5. Globalization, economics, and Judeo-Christian morality -- The Oxford declaration on Christian faith and economics / Economic justice : a biblical paradigm / Case 5.1. Downsizing : efficiency or corporate hit men? -- Case 5.2. Executive compensation : out of control or market appropriate? -- Case 5.3. Selling eggs and embryos -- Commentary -- Ch. 6. International business -- Ethical theory and bribery / Two cheers for sweatshops / Pt. III. Contemporary ethical issues in business -- Ch. 7. Human resources management -- The moral foundation of employee rights / Privacy, the workplace and the Internet / The double jeopardy of sexual harassment / Case 7.1. Benefits for spousal equivalents -- Case 7.2. Conflicts of conscience -- Case 7.3. Family-friendly flex policies -- Commentary -- Ch. 8. Accounting and finance -- Financial ethics : an overview / Case 8.1. Audit adjustments -- Case 8.2. The new insiders -- Case 8.3. Stock analysts and investment bankers -- Commentary -- Ch. 9. Marketing and advertising -- The morality (?) of advertising / The making of self and world in advertising / Making consumers / Case 9.1. Diamonds are forever -- Case 9.2. School-based marketing -- Commentary -- Ch. 10. Environmental stewardship -- Business and environmental ethics / The challenge of biocentrism / Case 10.1. Heap-leach mining in Latin America -- Case 10.2. Yew trees and cancer cures -- Case 10.3. Animal testing for perfumes -- Commentary -- Ch. 11. Technology in the workplace -- Is technology (ever) evil? / Five big issues in today's technological workplace / LittleBrother is watching you / Case 11.1. Customer service and privacy -- Case 11.2. To catch a thief -- Commentary -- Ch. 12. Moral leadership in business -- Creating and encouraging ethical corporate structures / The place of character in corporate ethics / Why should my conscience bother me? : The aircraft brake scandal / Case 12.1. Billing practices and the bankruptcy courts -- Case 12.2. H"Beyond Integrity is neither excessively theoretical nor simplistic and dogmatic. Rather, it offers a balanced and pragmatic approach to a number of concrete ethical issues. Readings from a wide range of sources present competing perspectives on each issue, and real-life case studies further help the reader grapple with ethical dilemmas. The authors conclude each chapter with their own distinctly Christian commentary on the topic covered."--BOOK JACKET.d]Business ethics. Business Religious aspects Christianity. Business Religious aspects Judaism.$Rae, Scott B. Wong, Kenman L.0)QGU MtGravatt HF5387 .B49 2004 In Library\h[ZMark S Schwartzp 2003(!The "ethics" of ethical investing\&Journal of Business Ethics; JBEi433p 195 Mar01674544on fileD=Studies Ethics Social responsibility Mutual funds Investments|vThere appears to be an implicit assumption by those connected with the ethical investment movement (e.g., ethical investment firms, individual investors, social investment organizations, academia, and the media), that ethical investment is in fact ethical. This paper will attempt to challenge the notion that the ethical mutual fund industry, as currently taking place, is acting in an ethical manner. Ethical issues such as the transparency of the funds and advertising are discussed. Ethical mutual fund screens such as tobacco, alcohol, gambling, and the military are preliminarily examined to better determine whether they can actually be defined as "ethical" screens as opposed to merely social, political, or religious screens. A code of ethics for ethical investment is constructed by which ethical mutual fund firms can be audited for ethical compliance. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]WORD COUNT: 11488s1052150X>7Corporate Social Responsiblity: A Three-Domain Approach& Mark S Schwartz Archie B Carroll Business Ethics Quarterly Octt 2003503-530134rlIdentified and discussed are 3 issues with respect to Archie Carroll's model of corporate social responsibility (CSR). They are items upon which a proposed 3-domain model proposes changes. The 3 issues include: 1. the use of a pyramid to depict the relationships among the 4 components of the model, 2. the role of philanthropy as a separate component in the model, and 3. the incomplete theoretical development of the economic, legal, and ethical domains. A major feature of the 3-domain model is the depiction of economic, legal, and ethical domains of responsibility in a Venn diagram which highlights the overlapping nature of the domains and the resultant creation of 7 categories in which CSR may be conceptualized, analyzed, and illustrated. The model is proposed as an alternative means of describing CSR activity and orientations which pervade the business community.VPUnited States; US Social responsibility Models Business ethics Management theory Scott, Mike 2005$Project Finance Sparks ChangerFinancial Times21 Marchon file& equator principles finance banksRKRational Fools: A Critique of the Behavioral Foundations of Economic Theory{Sen, Amartya K.$Philosophy and Public Affairs6317-344 0048-3915Behavior ; Commitment ; Contract ; Economics ; Ethics ; Morality ; Norm ; Preference ; Rationality ; Social Phil; Utility ; War$SUM 77 ENGLISH JOURNAL-ARTICLE 1977Sethi, S. Prakashp 2005~wInvesting in Socially Responsible Companies is a Must for Public Pension Funds Because There is no Better Alternative\ Journal of Business Ethics56 99129$filed under S & electronicallyWith assets of over US$1.0 trillion and growing, public pension funds in the US have become a major force in the private sector through their holding of equity positions in large publicly traded corporations. More recently, these funds have been expanding their investment strategy by considering a corporation's long-term risks on issues such as environmental protection, sustainability, and good corporate citizenship, and how these factors impact a company's long-term performance. In this paper, it is asserted that, contrary to conventional wisdom, pension funds, and for that matter other mutual funds, must be concerned with the long-term survival and growth of corporations. These measures are generally referred to "socially responsible investing" and when applied to corporations, it is termed "socially responsible corporate conduct." It is demonstrated that current measurement of future risk assessment invariably understates these long-term risks because of the inherent bias towards short-run.2004, top 10 public pension funds in the US controlled almost $1 trillion in assets (CalPERS, Federal Retirement Thrift, Florida State Board, New York State Common, CalSTRS, Texas Teachers, New York State Teachers, TIAA-CREF). (100)othe growth of corporate virtue is a dearth of vision among business leaders. Opportunities abound to devise programs and processes that benefit society as they enrich shareholders. What seems lacking is imaginationa nd intrinsic motivation on the part of corporations and executives. (10) Greatest barrier is lack of economic incentives. Although the business community frequently derides government regulators, pressure from these sources can help responsible corporate behaviour migrate from the structural frontier to the civil foundation. E.g. mandatory air bags. E.g. Corporate average fuel Eocnomy regulations. Too bad so few regulations produce such happy outcomes. Some US pollution-control guidelines, for instance, have been estimated to cost society $1 billion per life saved. (10-11) Problem when regulations cause MNCs to leave. (11) Foreign Corrupt Practices Act - attempts to universalise a feature fo the US civil foundation by prhobiting bribery oversas. For the most part, the act has maintained a level playing field for US coprorations as they go after foreign business. but many of these companies complain that the act puts them at a disadvantage compared with corporations from countries where bribes are considred just another cost of doing business. (11)  Mays, Shaun 2003JDCorporate Sustainability - an Investor Perspective: The Mays Report. Canberra HADepartment of the Environment and Heritage, Australian Governmentlon file0*Sustainable development Investment driversb("Schepers, Donald Sethi, S. Prakash 2003Do Socially Responsible Funds Actually Deliver What They Promise? Bridging the Gap Between the Promise and Performance of Socially Responsible Funds"Business and Society Review 108 11-32on file SRI Performance evaluationnhInvestigates: (a) how well do SRI funds meet the preferences and expectations of individual investors and (b) to what extent have SRI funds brought about changes in corporate conduct? Critiques definitions of SRI. Some funds use nonfinancial screens based on religious principles and are included in size & growth measurements of SRI industry but don't themselves claim to be part of the SRI movement. (14) Only a small proportion of funds are part of SIF, "indicating the interest of fund managemetn to be associated with SRI." Of 230 funds identified under broad banner, only 76 are SIF members. ONly $9 billion of $153 billion identified as 'socially screened'. (14) Critiques Domini's approach to identifying SRI funds. Criticises assessment approaches: (a) lack of consistency between investment practices and SRI criteria (b) inconsistency between companies - SR fund that rejects one company for allegedly socially irresponsible conduct often accepts another with similar characteristics (c) problems with primary and secondary culprits and threshold approach. E.g. tobacco company might be excluded, but not a company that transports these products. KLD uses a 15% cut-off limit on revenue derived from excluded activity - biases against small companies and favours larger companies whose 'socially undesirable' conduct might be larger in absolute terms. (d) lack of transparency of slection criteria - difficult to evaluate suitability of portfolio slection criteria or consistency with mission statement. Criticises quality and rigor of research methodology: - exclusionary screens are absolute and passive in that they do not examine nuances or variations in different corporations' performance. Critiera for exclusionary screens are flawed. Rationale are overly simplistic concenetrating on outputs or observables rather than impacts. They are indiscriminate and unevenly applied. (19) Exclusions are arbitrarily applied - "where is the rationale for limiting the application of exclusionary screens to the primary corporations only and ignoring he relevance of 'social harm' crtieria to other companies int eh supply chain...?". Criticises positive screens: The criteria are often only applied to companies that meet screens for financial performance. "The logic of this approach is disturbing. Let's assume for the sake of argument that we are not talking about 'money losing' companies or companies on the brink of insolvency. Now suppose that a corporation, vigorously pursuing responsible social conduct, is willing to accept marginally less profitability when compared to the majority of companies in that investment sector that are pursuing profits without regard to their social impact provided their conduct is not illega. This approach has the perverse efect of rejecting those corproations that are 'trail blazers' in socially responsible conduct and are willing to sacrifice short-term profits in pursuit of substantive SR goals. The SRI movement in its current form panders largely to superficial criteira of socially responsible conduct, which has the potential effect of discouraging those corporations who are striving to become role models and thereby alter the behaviour of entire industries. (21-22) Wide margin of variability in defining an attribute - little practical guidance on how to operationalise descriptive definitions. Critique approaches to diversity. "Therefore, it behooves the SRI industry to undertake serious research, data collection, and evaluation on issues pertaining to portfolio selection. Unfortuantely, at this point the SRI industry does nto appear to be moving in this direction. (23) They outline a process of stock selection which is lacking in rigor: "typically, a committee of staff memebers of the SRI fund makes investment decisions. EAch corporations social conduct is discussed and a consensus-based deicison is made. The research data and background information on the corproation often consists of newspaper sotries, anecdotal information, and occasionally conversations with corporate officials. The aughos know of no fund that generates detailed, systematic information on various criteria of 'socially responsible' conduct. (23) They suggest a methodology - statistically based qualitative research approaches - that could be used. criticise best-in-class approach - "a rater unconcerned with sectoral investment is unliely to make the same determination of suitability." (24) SRI spends a large part of its promotional effort to justify the funds' financial and not social performance measures. Many studies in this area, but authors could not find any comparable studies that examined the SRI industry's performance on social responsiblity criteria. (25) Changing corporate conduct. SRI funds have very little bargaining leverage to influence corporate behaviour based on equity holdings. One case where a large number of indsittuional funds acted collectively to influence corporate behaviour - South Africa. ...these pressures alone would not have succeeded but for the fact of large-scale protest against US corporations' operations in South Africa. (26-27) Teh overwhleming majority of shareholder proposals are offered by indviduals and groups in their capacity as shareholders and not by SRI funds. (27) Suggest that SRI funds could influence corporate behaviour by conducting or sponsoring research about corporate conduct ...where informationa bout such conduct would have strong impact on public opinion. (28) Suggest that SRI funds become more modest and truthful in their claims and assertions. They should resist the temptation to offer investors a one-size-fits-all version of the good corporation, whcih is deceptive and int he long run counterproductive. (29) The SRI industry shoudl endeavour to develop a basket of 'social choice' funds where individual investors would be the arbiters of their preferences for socially desired corporate conduct in one or more dimensions. (29)f`Terms of Global Business Engagement in Ethically Challenging Environments: Applications to BurmaSchermerhorn Jr, John R. Business Ethics Quarterlyl93485-505 1052-150X@:This paper introduces controversies with foreign investment in Burma to develop and describe alternative terms of global business engagement in ethically challenging settings. Two forms of engagement--unrestricted and constructive--and two forms of nonengagement--principled and sanctioned--are discussed. (edited)0*Burmese ; Business Ethics; Ethics ; Global Jl 99 English 1999 9715611974&Managing government expenditure Manila Asian Development Bank 1999xix, 529voSalvatore Schiavo-Campo and Daniel Tommasi. Bibliography: p. 519-529. Ch. 1. An Overview of Public Expenditure Management -- Pt. I. The Budget and its Preparation. Ch. 2. The Budget and its Coverage. Ch. 3. Budget Systems and Expenditure Classification. Ch. 4. The Budget Preparation Process. Ch. 5. Organizational Issues in the Budget Preparation and Approval Process -- Pt. II. Budget Execution. Ch. 6. Assuring Compliance in Budget Execution. Ch. 7. Managing and Monitoring Budget Implementation. Ch. 8. Cash Management and the Treasury Function. Ch. 9. Management Controls, Audit, and Evaluation (OECD) / Pt. III. The Technical Infrastructure. Ch. 10. Accounting. Ch. 11. Reporting. Ch. 12. The Programming of Public Investment and the Management of External Assistance. Ch. 13. Multi-Year Expenditure Programming Approaches. Ch. 14. Information and Communication Technology (ICT) in Public Expenditure Management (PEM) / Pt. IV. Improving Public Expenditure Management. Ch. 15. Strengthening Performance in Public Expenditure Management. Ch. 16. Budgeting Reforms in OECD Member Countries / Ch. 17. How to Get there from here: The Strategy and Sequencing of Budgetary Reform. Statistical App.: Major Fiscal and Expenditure Aggregates -- Annex I. Code of Good Practices on Fiscal Transparency -- Annex II. The New Public Management -- Annex III. Anti-Corruption Policy of the Asian Development Bank -- Annex IV. Principles for Managing Ethics in the Public Service -- Annex V. The IMF Monetary Model: A Hardy Perennial / Annex VI. The Medium-Range Forecast in Hong Kong, China -- Annex VII. The Functions of a Ministry of Finance: The Example of Canada -- Annex VIII. A Model Organic Budget Law -- Annex IX. An Illustration of Financial Reporting: Singapore -- Annex X. Information Systems for Fiscal Management / Annex XI. Questionnaire for the Assessment of Public Expenditure Management Systems /6/Expenditures, Public Budget. Budget Management.HASchiavo-Campo, Salvatore Tommasi, Daniel Asian Development Bank.,.'QGU Nathan Gov ZZ AD B99 M13 In LibraryI@@H@I@K@L@M@N@W@Y@Z@d@j@/`42000:2003;2003?20042004} Aasland2004 Abbarno2001 Adler1993 Albertson2005 Ali2002Anderson1996P Anon2004w Arbouw2005 Arnold2001nw ASFA2000Asian Development Bank.1999z ASIC2002wxAslaksen2002P Baker1995 Baker1996 Baker1998 Bandow199390 Bansal2002 Barbut2005 Barnes1993\ Baue2005w Baue2005b Baue2005c Baue2005d Beauchamp1999k Bellet20012; Black1995 Boatright1999 Boatright2001i Bodwell2002 Bone2000ws Bonvin20030 Boselovic2005 Brammer2004S Brennan1986kBrillk Brinchmann2001 Broadhurst2000o Broadhurst2003 Brown2000Buchholz2002P Bukovansky2002 Byrne1995 Carmichael2001 Carpenter2001 Carroll2000[ Carroll2003 Carson1993 Carson19981Carswell2002p=1+Centre for Professional Development (Aust.)1994lChadwick19982Chambers2002p Chitsomboon2005 Christensen2002 Christian-Aid2004 Chryssides1996 Clark1993r Clark2003 Clark-Murphy20044 Clarke19953 Clarke1997 Cocklin Cohen1997 Coltman2004 Corey2000 Cosier1991 Cowton1998 Cowton1999 Cowton1999a Cowton20044  Cox2004 Coxon1995 Cramer2004^ Crisp19977Cummings2000p Dalton1991Davidson2004sDavidson2005 Davies2005 Davis2005s Dembinski2003%Deni-Green-Consulting-Services2002%Deni-Green-Consulting-Services2004/ Derkley Dewe19971 Di Norcia20008 Dillenburg20039 Diltz1995)Doh Doh2005 Domini2001s Dommen20030 Dorn1999#A Dreier1990 Dunfee2000z Dunfee2002 Duska1995tEIRIS Elgie2001: Elkington1999- Emerson8 Erekson2003 Ethibel2003r Eurosif2003q Eurosif2004 Eurosif2004 Everett1998 Ezell2005 Fayers Felicetti1996k Ferlingr Ferrell2003r Ferrell2003 Ferrell2004 Ferrer1998 Fess19999 Fiedler2005 Fiet19991 Filbeck2003; Fischer1995< Flynn2003 Foegen19939= Francis1994 Fraser2005 Frech1993, Freeman> Freeman1999? French2000 Frewer1995 Frey1996 Frey1997 Frost1995@ Frost2004P Frost2004 Fryer1996O Gardner2004 Garriga2004 Gascoigne2005A Gaus1990 Gay2003 Gelb2001 Gerrans2004B Giddens2001 Giraud1994+ Glickman4 Gold2002 Goodin1997{ Goodpaster2002Goslings1997Pi Graves200228 Greene20032C Greenfield2004 Griffin2005 Group2004)Guay Gunther2005(Haigh' HardimanD Harman1996' HarrisonHarrison1999P Hartman2002 Hassett2004 Hawken2004 Hawken2005 Hawley2002 Hawley2003 Hawley2005( Hazelton Heinze1999&Hely0 Henderson1993E Henderson2000 Henderson2004 Hess20000| HildyardwF Hill Jr1997{ Hoggett2002 HolmesHomer Vanniasinkam2003Huberman Arnold2001B Hutton20011G Hutton2001 Institute2004E?Institute of Chartered Financial Analysts. Research Foundation.1995 Introcaso1994 Introcaso1994| Irvine2002 Jagels2004Jamieson2000PH Jeucken2001I Jeucken2002} Johnsen2003 Johnson1997 Jones2001 Jonker2004Josselin2001P Jouni2003 Joyner2002 Kaler1996K Kaler2000L Kamm1992 Kamp2004w Kapelus2002 Keefe2004 Keeps1999 King2001 Klaasen2003 Klotzko1998#Knollm Knowles1997 Kohls2002 Kolers2001Kopelman1999P Kracher1997 Krausz1996 Kristoffersen2004~Krumsiek2002P Kuehn1996~ Kujala2004 Kurtz1999@ Laan2004P Laan20040  LaFollette1993  LaFollette1994 Lam2002 Landesman1995,=<; `"Filbeck, Greg Preece, Dianna 2003XQAnnouncement Effects of the Working Mother Annual Survey of Family-Friendly Firms3Journal of Investing123 87 Filed under F:4family-friendly policies stockmarket reactions ValueZSAn increasing number of firms are adopting family-friendly policies as a means of improving morale and increasing the productivity of their workforce. Firms adopting such policies are often lauded for their concern for their workers. Beginning in 1986, Working Mother magazine began publishing an annual survey of the 100 best companies for working mothers to recognize those firms with exemplary family-friendly policies. Implementing family-friendly strategies can be quite costly. While workers may find these companies attractive, does the market find that the potential benefits of these programs outweigh their costs? In this article, the authors examine the stock market's reaction to firms that are listed on Working Mother's annual survey. They find that the market reacts negatively to announcements of firms that are included in the survey.w<50312127928 (pbk.) 0312127901 (cloth) 0312127928 (pbk)`JDGreening environmental policy : the politics of a sustainable future 1st New York St. Martin's Press 1995 xvii, 221PJ95017008 edited by Frank Fischer and Michael Black. Includes bibliographical references and index. 1. The uncertain quest for sustainability: public discourse and the politics of environmentalism / 2. Sustainable development as a power/knowledge system: the problem of 'governmentality' / 3. Towards a sustainable future: the organizing role of ecologism in the north-south relationship / 4. The unnatural policies of natural resource agencies: fishery policy on the Sacramento River / 5. Environmental technology and the green car: towards a sustainable transportation policy / 6. The North American Free Trade Agreement and the environment: economic growth versus democratic politics / 7. Environmental policy in Chile: the politics of the comprehensive law / 8. Environmental values for a sustainable society: the democratic challenge / 9. Acid rain in Great Britain: environmental discourse and the hidden politics of institutional practice / 10. Hazardous waste policy, community movements and the politics of Nimby: participatory risk assessment in the USA and Canada / 11. Industrial and environmental crises: rethinking corporate social responsibility / 12. Strategic management and business policy-making: bringing in environmental values / Appendix Global warming and the greenhouse effect: implications for international environmental policy /Broadly committed to the goals and values of a green political perspective, the chapters in this book show the environmental crisis to be essentially a political-economic crisis. The pursuit of sustainability cannot proceed without significant changes in our economic enterprises, public institutions and personal lives. Reaching beyond the contradictions of sustainable development, the authors explore the kinds of political arrangements needed to throw open sustainability to wide-ranging debate, both national and international. They advance alternative environmental policymaking processes designed to forge a genuine political consensus around these questions, as well as institutional, cultural and behavioural strategies capable of translating it into effective policy solutions. Fundamental to these strategies, a progressive commitment to participatory democracy is seen to provide the surest footing for both the articulation and realization of a sustainable future.4.Sustainable development. Environmental policy.$Fischer, Frank Black, Michael.'QGU Nathan HC79.E5 G692 1995 In LibraryFlynn, Patricia C. 2003F?Ethics in the Board Room: Contracts or Fiduciary Relationships?*$Philosophy in the Contemporary World101 43-48 1077-1999on file.82Board Room Contract Corporation Ethics FiduciaryMost contemporary discussions of institutional ethics take contractual rather than fiduciary relations as the model for describing moral responsibilities, leaving institutional boards with few resources to support and critique their moral behavior. I argue that institutional fiduciary relationships cannot be characterized as contracts, either in fact or function. Each form of relationship privileges a different set of behaviors and values that are far from interchangeable.Spr-Sum 03 English1863391142 (pbk.)60Business ethics in Australia : a practical guide  Kew, Vic. <6Centre for Professional Development : Law Book Company 1994xxi, 208VOR.D. Francis. Includes index. Includes bibliographical references (p. 193-199). Business ethics Australia.F?Francis, Ronald D. Centre for Professional Development (Aust.),eVPQGU GoldCoast HF5387 .F72 1994 In Library QGU Nathan HF5387 .F72 1994 In Library Fraser, Bruce 2005&Corporate Social Responsibility}The Internal Auditor621e 42-48cFebruaryon files CSR1:4Argues the financial benefits and necessities of CSR A67342001Freeman, PeterHow green is your money?JDThe Bulletin with Newsweek1440-7485Sept 26, 2000, v118 i6243, p84(3)~::q\r(27928 (pbk)`JDGreening environmental policy : the politics of a sustainable future 1st New York Ethibel 2003F?Fourth Generation on the Socially Responsible Investment Marketi Ethibelu 2005 May2on file360http://www.ethibel.org/subs_e/1_info/sub1_2.html Eurosifr 2003ZSSocially Responsible Investment among European Institutional Investors: 2003 ReportA Paris3 <5European Sustainable and Responsible Investment Forum7 saved EuropeTMhttp://www.eurosif.org/pub2/lib/2003/10/srirept/eurosif-srireprt-2003-all.pdfp Eurosifl 2004,%Pension Program SRI Toolkit 2004-2005ccopy on computerEurosifs 2004D>Eurosif Transparency Guidelines for the Retail SRI Fund Sector Parisc Eurosif 2005 Aprilon fileDisclosure EuropeoTMhttp://www.eurosif.org/pub2/lib/2004/11/transpgl/Eurosif-TranspGuidelines.pdft(!Everett, Jennifer Wilcox, Shelleyr 1998XRMoral Discourse and Social Responsibility: Comments on Machan's Critique of Jaggar"Journal of Social Philosophy293}142-152 0047-2786 paper on file0*Ethics Feminism Moral Theory Jaggar MachanAlison Jaggar's attempt to develop a distinctively feminist conception of moral reasoning has been attacked by Tibor Machan, who claims that Jaggar's model replaces rational moral argumentation with uncritical emotional venting, stereotypes men's and women's communication styles, and holds individual collectively guilty for injustices they had no part in creating. We argue that each of Machan's objections grossly misinterprets Jaggar's views. Moreover, we reject Machan's facile conception of sexism and racism as nothing more than the sum of individuals' intentionally sexist or racist acts. This conception obscures a subtler sense in which individual members of privileged groups can legitimately be said to bear responsibility for ongoing social injustices.lWint 98 English Ezell, Hank 2005RKYour Money: Socially Responsible Funds Did Well in '04, but Vice Did Better("The Atlanta Journal - Constitution Atlantas Q.5 Home 23 Januaryon file SRI fundsRKNotes opening of SR ETFs in 2006; reports how well SRI funds did in the US."4.Reflexiones eticas a proposito de la clonacionFerrer, Jorge J. Gregorianump791129-148 0017-4114t2+After a brief overview of the scientific data on cloning, the article examines the ethical issues put forth by this particular form of reproduction. A distinction is made between the application of cloning to the animal and vegetable realms and to the human species. The cloning of plants and animals is ethically permissible if it guarantees the preservation of species and of genetic diversity within the species. Humanking is not entitled to an absolute and irresponsible dominion--"ius utendi et abutendi"--over the world. As the Yahwist has taught us, the human person has been placed in the middle of the garden as its guardian and caretaker (Gn 2,15). On the other hand, the prudent use of vegetable and animal cloning can render a great service to humankind both in agriculture and in medicine. (edited)>7Cloning ; Dignity ; Embryo ; Ethics ; Human ; Paternity 1998 Italian 1998Fiedler, Terry 2005 Making Change Utne 128r 20-2Mar/Aprnon file  Hawken SRIovements and the politics of Nimby: participatory risk assessment in the USA and Canada / 11. Industrial and environmental crises: rethinking corporate social responsibility / 12. Strategic management and business policy-making: bringing in environmental values / Appendix Global warming and the greenhouse effect: implications for international environmental policy /Broadly committed to the goals and values of a green political perspective, the chapters in this book show the environmental crisis to be essentially a political-economic crisis. The pursuit of sustainability cannot proceed without significant changes in our economic enterprises, public institutions and personal lives. Reaching beyond the contradictions of sustainable development, the authors explore the kinds of political arrangements needed to throw open sustainability to wide-ranging debate, both national and international. They advance alternative environmental policymaking processes designed to forge a genuine political consensus around these questions, as well as institutional, cultural and behavioural strategies capable of translating it into effective policy solutions. Fundamental to these strategies, a progressive commitment to participatory democracy is seen to provide the surest footing for both the articulation and realization of a sustainable future.4.Sustainable development. Environmental policy.$Fischer, Frank Black, Michael.'QGU Nathan HC79.E5 G692 1995 In LibraryFlynn, Patricia C. 2003F?Ethics in the Board Room: Contracts or Fiduciary Relationships?*$Philosophy in the Contemporary World101 43-48 1077-1999on file.82Board Room Contract Corporation Ethics FiduciaryMost contemporary discussions of institutional ethics take contractual rather than fiduciary relations as the model for describing moral responsibilities, leaving institutional boards with few resources to support and critique their moral behavior. I argue that institutional fiduciary relationships cannot be characterized as contracts, either in fact or function. Each form of relationship privileges a different set of behaviors and values that are far from interchangeable.Spr-Sum 03 English1863391142 (pbk.)60Business ethics in Australia : a practical guide  Kew, Vic. <6Centre for Professional Development : Law Book Company 1994xxi, 208VOR.D. Francis. Includes index. Includes bibliographical references (p. 193-199). Business ethics Australia.F?Francis, Ronald D. Centre for Professional Development (Aust.),eVPQGU GoldCoast HF5387 .F72 1994 In Library QGU Nathan HF5387 .F72 1994 In Library Fraser, Bruce 2005&Corporate Social Responsibility}The Internal Auditor621e 42-48cFebruaryon files CSR1:4Argues the financial benefits and necessities of CSR A67342001Freeman, PeterHow green is your money?JDThe Bulletin with Newsweek1440-7485Sept 26, 2000, v118 i6243, p84(3) "|Gv{Fl| *E0002764281Transnational corporations and global citizenshipHazel HendersondWORD COUNT: 13558o(!The American Behavioral Scientist May 2000 1231-1261438Transnational corporations are major global actors, many larger than most nation states. The evolution of their organizational structures and of relevant national and international law is reviewed briefly.:4Multinational corporations Globalization CitizenshipHenderson, Hazel 2004:3Corporate Social Responsibility: Walking the Talk C5 2004 May  d ^Paul Hawken's critique is only one aspect of this much larger question: can capitalism's current model and its globalization of finance, markets, trade, privatization and currency regimes under its traditional assumptions continue without radical reform? My own work over the past 25 years has critiqued capitalism itself in far deeper terms: its obsolescent assumptions about human nature as driven only by greed and selfishness, its view of nature's resources as exploitable, its ignoring of all other values in its pursuit of the conventional profitability Wall Street still demands and its myopia concerning the scientific realities of this new century. Attacking only the emerging SRI segment of this still dominant model of socially and environmentally destructive capitalism will obviously reinforce this entrenched model with its enormous power, lobbying clout and control of mass media. These forces of reactionary capitalismwhether on Wall Street, Frankfurt , London or Hong Kong--- and companies in the old fossil-fueled, unsustainable industrial system, will welcome Paul Hawken with glee as their newest spokesperson. This is unfortunate, since we know from past experience how often perfectionism, utopianism and visionary zeal can drive out the good, just as the theoretical best can drive out the better. Incremental reforms such as SRI need the time and space to experiment. New norms and ethical criteria need to gain a foothold in these markets, as well as society and most important, in mass media. ... But let's be honest. We are all human and fallible. Too often in history well-intentioned utopianism has ushered in periods of fascism and totalitarian Puritanism. Ethical Marketplace provides roundtable debates from all sides in these new SRI-CSR-LOHAS- based Sustainability Sectors. We will recognize steps forward: from incremental to continuous improvement to the bold radical social innovations such as Brazils BOVESPA and its new Social Stock Exchange an electronic market board offering social returns to all market players wishing to invest in non-profit civic organizations addressing Brazil's social and environmental goals. Ethical Marketplace will also use and track the evolution of all the new metrics, indicators, and scorecards of human progress beyond GNP/GDP growth toward sustainability and a more equitable quality of life for all humanity.VPhttp://www.hazelhenderson.com/editorials/corporateSocialResponsibility09-04.html & Hildyard, Nicholas Mansley, Mark2+The campaigners' guide to financial marketse London?}copy on file - in boxaReasonable Self-InterestHill Jr, Thomas E."Social Philosophy and Policy141. 52-85t 0265-0525Common sense ideas of what is reasonable are compared and contrasted with philosophical ideas of rational choice: maximizing self-interest, efficiency and coherence in pursuit of one's ends, maximizing intrinsic value and efficient and coherent pursuits constrained by a Kantian ideal of colegislation. Contrary to usual assumptions, the last, it is argued, corresponds more closely to the common sense ideas than any of the other models. This is not proof of the Kantian ideal, or of common sense, but calls for rethinking assumptions. Morality and reasonable self-interest, it is suggested, are less sharply opposed than philosophers typically suppose.2,Ethics ; Moral Theory; Self Interest; VirtueWint 97 English 1997Hoggett, Jim Nahan, Mike 20022,Ethical investment - Deconstructing the myth*$Review - Institute of Public Affairs543} 3-6l paper on file}$ethics Morality ethical fundsLECommerce with a Conscience: Corporate Control and Academic Investment*$Huberman Arnold, Diane Arnold, KeithBusiness Ethics 104^294-301u 0962-8770jcCorporations have been investing in academia to an extent that could be classified as a corporate takeover of universities. Intrauniversity critics see this as an ethical problem, because of the degree of business control over university policies and decisions which accompanies the funding. However, there is a conflict of interest here. Universities have a public trust and a fiduciary duty not to compromise education. This implies a covenant not to cede power to outside interests, not to use university resources, or faculty and students, as a means to an educationally irrelevant end. Universities cannot sell out. However, it seems equally dishonest not to offer their students a well-funded first-rate, quality education in applied fields with current skills, maximum research opportunity, and the corporate ties that would allow them to obtain jobs. (edited)HAAcademia ; Commerce ; Conscience ; Control ; Corporation ; Ethics O 01 English 200101674544ngSession 3 -- Topics in business ethics -- corporate stakeholding, ethical investment, social accounting.'Will Hutton Alan MacDougall Simon ZadeknWORD COUNT: 8210&Journal of Business Ethics; JBE Jul 2001107-11732 2; 2Speeches before the 1997 Young Fabians' Conference on "The Ethics of Good Business" were concerned with business ethics, corporate stakeholding, ethical investments and social accounting.United States; US; United Kingdom; UK Stakeholders Business ethics Corporate governance Social investing Social accounting Commercial law Reforms0)Ill-Wind Investing: The Ethics of WishingIrvine, William B. Journal of Business Ethics351 57-63 0167-4544r<5Ethics ; Exploitation ; Investment ; Profit ; WishingJa I 02 Englishy 2002("0471092223 (alk. paper) 0471092223(!Hospitality management accounting 8thm  Hoboken, N.J.5 J. Wiley 2004ix, 6124.2002012155 Martin G. Jagels, Michael M. Coltman. Rev. ed. of: Hospitality management accounting / Michael M. Coltman, Martin G. Jagels. 7th ed. 2001. Includes index. Ch. 1. Basic Financial Accounting Review -- Ch. 2. Understanding Financial Statements -- Ch. 3. Analysis and Interpretation of Financial Statements -- Ch. 4. Ratio Analysis -- Ch. 5. Internal Control -- Ch. 6. The Bottom-Up Approach to Pricing -- Ch. 7. Cost Management -- Ch. 8. The Cost-Volume-Profit Approach to Decisions -- Ch. 9. Operations Budgeting -- Ch. 10. Statement of Cash Flows and Working Capital Analysis -- Ch. 11. Cash Management -- Ch. 12. Capital Budgeting and the Investment Decision -- Ch. 13. Feasibility Studies - An Introduction -- Ch. 14. Financial Goals and Information Systems -- App. Computers in Hospitality Management."This text offers valuable preparation for the increasingly complex and competitive hospitality industry with hands-on coverage of computer applications and ethics situations focused on honing decision-making skills. Packed with accurate up-to-date case studies, exercises, and problems, this Eighth Edition offers alternative solutions to provide a variety of problem-solving approaches."--BOOK JACKET.d]Hotels Accounting. Taverns (Inns) Accounting. Food service Accounting. Managerial accounting.("Jagels, Martin Coltman, Michael M.2,QGU GoldCoast HF5686.H75 C53 2004 In Library ^ &Trees and Spaces as Emotion and Norm Laden Components of Local Ecosystems in Nyamaropa Communal Land, Nyanga District, ZimbabweMandondo, Alois"Agriculture and Human Values144353-372 0889-048X This study explored local controls relating to trees and spaces of the local environment in Nyamaropa Communal Lands in the Nyanga District of Eastern Zimbabwe. Controls were considered in a broad and inclusive framework encompassing codified rules, taboos, and, regulatory norms and emotions. Special emphasis was laid on people's emotional and ethical investment in the above components of the environment--trees and spaces. (edited)<5African ; Ecosystem ; Emotion ; Ethics ; Space ; Tree D 97 English 1997Manheim, Jarol 20040*Biz-War and Socially Responsible Investing*$Review - Institute of Public Affairs5645 26-30aon file{{The SRI movement is designed to generate leverage on corporate behaviurs through the pooling and application fo wealth in sufficient volume to force changes in corporate governance, in coproate behaviour, and collecitvely in public policy. It is more appropriate to think of SRI as an industry - one whose lifeblood is a constant stream of attack messages against corporations.:3Xenotransplantation: Animal Rights and Human WrongsB;Mani, Vasudevan Mathew, Ryan Homer Vanniasinkam, ShervanthiEthics and Medicine191  55-61 0226-688XImprovements in transplant surgery and an increasing ability to control organ rejection using immunosuppressive medication has made transplantation the treatment of choice for a new generation. Unfortunately, these advancements have resulted in transplantation becoming a victim of its own success, as waiting lists have increased along with the waiting time for donor organs. For these reasons the use of animal organs for human transplantation is seriously being considered. Two groups of animals have been considered as donors: nonhuman primates and large nonprimates such as pigs. This article highlights the ethical issues associated with the use of animal organs, and the impact of xenotransplantation on animal communities. (edited)NGAnimal Rights; Cruelty ; Ethics ; Organ ; Welfare ; Xenotransplantation Spr 03 English 2003Markham Thompson, Mariae 2004F?Socially Responsible Investing Has Become a Mainstream Practices(!The Chronicle of Higher Education45038 B.24 28 Mayon file SRI<5superficial overview of the virtues and status of SRI Marshall, Bev Dewe, Philip 1997<5An Investigation of the Components of Moral Intensity Journal of Business Ethics16 521-29on file32,moral intensity Business Ethics moral modelsWhile there is considerable interest in the topic of business ethics, much of the research moves towards measuring components with a view to predicting ethical behaviour. To date there has not been a satisfactory definition of business ethics, nor has there been any real attempt to understand the components of a situation that may influence an individual's assessment of that situation as ethical or otherwise. Using Jones's (1991) construct of moral intensity as a basis for investigation, this paper presents some exploratory analysis on the context within which ethical decisions are assessed. The findings reveal that individuals differ in their assessments of the same situation and often use a number of complex reasons to explain whether a situation poses an ethical problem for them. These findings are discussed within a framework of measurement issues and future directions for research.$Explores the components of a situation that may influence an individual's assessment of that situation as ethical or otherwise. Lewis (1985): reviewed 254 documents trying to identify common ground in defining business ethics; found 308 concepts were represented. He likened the attempts to define business ethics as "like nailing jello to the wall (1985, 377). 2 broad categories of works in business ethics - (a) generalist conceptual writings on ethics and (b) more limited empirical research testing models and/or investigating the variables that contribute to ethical behaviour. Problems with empirical research in business ethics: lack of experimental rigour and theoretical frameworks. Critique of ethical models which assume that individuals will make decisions in the same way regardless of the nature and importance of the moral issue. Jones (1991) presents a rough synthesis of existing ethical decision-making models based around REst's (1986) 4-stage model. He proposes an issue contingent model based on the central notion of moral intensity, that is, "the characteristics of the moral issue itself. Jones defines moral intensity in the following 6 components: Magnitude of consequences Social consensus Probability of effect Temporal immediacy Proximity Concentration of effect Little testing of this model - some work suggesting that not all components are important at all. Responses in this research showed that "in assessing a situation individusla may differ in their evaluation of whether or not a situation poses an ethical problem". Martin, Roger 2002LEThe Virtue Matrix: Calculating the Return on Corporate REsponsibilityHarvard Business Reviewe?R 5-11on filea>8Corporate responsibility Virtue Regulation Globalizationvpdrivers of corporate virtue. Instrumental CSR - explicitly serves the purpose of enhancing shareholder value (6) Intrinsic CSR - because it's the right thing to do whether or not it serves shareholder interests (7). Has constructed a virtue matrix. depicts the forces that generate CSR. (a) Civil foundation - consists of norms, cutoms and laws that govern corporate practice - companies engage either by choice or compliance. Behaviour in this foundation does no more than meet society's baseline expectations. Instrumental. (b) Frontier - intrinsic motivation. Behaviour that benefits shareholders and adds to supply of social responsiblity fallsinto the strategic frontier. Structural frontier - actions that benefit society but not shareholders - creates a structural barrier to corporate action. (9) Globalisation and virtue. (9) The most significant impediment to the growth of corporate virtue is a dearth of vision among business leaders. Opportunities abound to devise programs and processes that benefit society as they enrich shareholders. What seems lacking is imaginationa nd intrinsic motivation on the part of corporations and executives. (10) Greatest barrier is lack of economic incentives. Although the business community frequently derides government regulators, pressure from these sources can help responsible corporate behaviour migrate from the structural frontier to the civil foundation. E.g. mandatory air bags. E.g. Corporate average fuel Eocnomy regulations. Too bad so few regulations produce such happy outcomes. Some US pollution-control guidelines, for instance, have been estimated to cost society $1 billion per life saved. (10-11) Problem when regulations cause MNCs to leave. (11) Foreign Corrupt Practices Act - attempts to universalise a feature fo the US civil foundation by prhobiting bribery oversas. For the most part, the act has maintained a level playing field for US coprorations as they go after foreign business. but many of these companies complain that the act puts them at a disadvantage compared with corporations from countries where bribes are considred just another cost of doing business. (11)  Mays, Shaun 2003JDCorporate Sustainability - an Investor Perspective: The Mays Report. Canberra HADepartment of the Environment and Heritage, Australian Governmentlon file0*Sustainable development Investment drivers 6xzw &8Albertson, Joshuav 2005:3SmartMoney Fund Screen / Socially Responsible Funds The Wall Street Journale New YorkD2 17 May Filed under An&SRI funds Financial performance`YReports research showing that SRI funds don't perform as well as others - 5-year results.f Ali, Paul Gold, Martin 2002voAn Appraisal of Socially Responsible Investments and Implications for Trustees and other Investment Fiduciariesn jcStellar Capital and Centre for Corporate Law and Centre for Corporate Law and Securities RegulationAustralia SRI background Anderson, Digby C. 199660What has "ethical investment" to do with ethics? London Social Affairs Unit135Research Report 210)QGU Nathan HG4515.13 .A52 1996 In Library on file  ethics ethical investmentADigby Anderson ; with contributions from Gerald Frost ... [et al.]. Research report / Social Affairs Unit, 21 Publication / Social Affairs Unit ; no. 65 Anon 2004HBFinding Strategic Corporate Citizenship: A New Game Theoretic ViewHarvard Law Review 117d 1957-1980on file8(!Game Theory corporate citizenship @ :US economy lost $35 b after the "antional deluge of corporate malfeasance" starting with Enron. Semantic paradox with combination of game theory and CSR....Yet promising work has successfully tied self-interest to public interests. (1958) Goal of paper is to define the conditions under which 'strategic corporate citizenship' - corporate behaviour that serves both a company's self-interest and the public interest - can exist, in the belief that altruism alone can neither explain nor fundamentally alter firm behaviour. (1958-59) In a variety of contexts, there is good evidence that exploitation of public goodwill by individual firms has depressed industry-wide profit. (1968) CSR as a private good: (a) some firms use CSR to enhance their reputations, whcih allows them to strengthen their brands and outperform in the pmarketplace, e.g. The Body Shop, Ben & Jerry's. (b) some firms direct CSR internally to capature the benefits of high employee morale and loyalty - an annually adjusted portfolio comprised of the pbulicly traded companies on Fortune magazine's annaul '100 best Companies to Work For' list would have yielded a 9% annual return, far outpacing the market. (c) some firms use CSR to shiled themselves from interest group criticism and public sanctions, e.g. Nike; (d) CSR sometimes provides private benefits to individual decision-makers, encouraging contribution from the firm, e.g. corporate donations are often made in teh name of the executives who initate them and not in their companies' names. (1969-70) This game implies that by tying socially responsible behaviour directly to profit maximisation (through reputational enhancement or employee motivation), by broadening the scope of how corporations define their self-interest (avoiding public opprobrium or conferring legitimacy) or by providing perks to individual decisionmakers, social responsiblity can be converted into strategic corporate citizenship. (1972) How to build a regime of strategic corporate citizenship: (a) Leviathin control vs self-enforcing solutions - regulatory control limited - cannot control corporates overseas. alternative is to cultivate a set of self-enforcing institutions to encourage strategic corporate citzenship. (b) privatisation of benefits - allow firms to capture for themselves more of the value they produce, e.g. investors have exhibited a willingness to pay an 18% premium for US compnaies perceived to exercise good corporate governance. (c) increase costs of defection - legilsation and regulation are almost always overinclusive (d) endogenise corporate citizenship - reforming norms. The design principles suggested here for building self-enforcing institutions of strategic corporate citizenship are to encouarge open communication; repeat interactions; monitor competitor behaviour; privatise public benefits; reduce the cost of contributing; recognise individual contribituions; encourage firms to bargain for and transfer benefits; and enable private actors to monitor, sanction, and educate themselves about the benefits that accrue to firms through socially responsible actions. (1980) Arbouw, John 2005$Looking Beyond the Bottom LineCompany Director216i 8-11 filed under At(!CSR triple bottom line Board Rooma  ASFA 200081Development of ASFA policy on 'ethical investmentx 60Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia 31 October paper on file1,%superannuation Policy consumer demand  ASIC 20020)Socially responsible investing disclosure Canberra 60Australian Securities and Investments CommissionDecember paper on filedguidelines DisclosureLEGender Constructions and the Possibility of a Generous Economic ActorAslaksen, JulieHypatia172118-132 0887-5367In this paper I discuss various approaches to human motivation, considering how the image of economic actors as motivated by narrow self-interest and greed may be changed to one of self-interest combined with generosity and social responsibility. I draw inspiration from feminist economics as well as from psychological, anthropological and mythological material. As an example, I consider the role of self-interest and generosity as motivating forces for ethical investment.TNEconomics ; Ethics ; Gender ; Generosity ; Motivation ; Self Interest Klein, MSpr 02 English 2002 0943205298:3H. Kent Baker, E. Theodore Veit, Michael R. Murphy.B7Business ethics. Investments Moral and ethical aspects.ztBaker, H. Kent Murphy, Michael R. Veit, E. Theodore Institute of Chartered Financial Analysts. Research Foundation.,,&QGU Nathan HF5387 .B34 1995 In LibraryVPEthical Attitudes and Behavior of Investment Professionals in the United Kingdom$Baker, H. Kent Veit, TheodorenProfessional Ethics5 1-2 87-117 1063-6579{PIAttitude ; Behavior ; British ; Ethics ; Investment ; Professional EthicsSpr-Sum 96 English 1996b\A Comparison of Ethics of Investment Professionals: North America Versus Pacific Rim Nations& Baker, H. Kent Veit, E. Theodore Journal of Business Ethics178917-937K 0167-4544This study examines the ethical attitudes and practices of securities analysts and portfolio managers from four Pacific Rim countries--Hong Kong, Japan, Singapore and Thailand--and compares the findings to a similar study of North American investment professionals to identify significant differences. The findings show that many differences exist due to cultural differences and differences in the regulatory environment between the Pacific Rim countries studied and North America.>7American ; Asian ; Business Ethics; Ethics ; Investment Je 98 English 1998M    & . 67_wOG ee /  wWG X  o  s    >  $ .9  0  )E o[ 6 S >Q-D n Ov