MOs|| @@@ @@@@6MM"l=\|7| EN DB | %    & . 67_wOG ee /  wWG X  o  s    > .9  0  )E o[ 6 S >Q $  M Landesman1995windpwindPpwindPwind9wind?wind?wind_windZPwind:wind9windwind0wind?windwindPwind0wind?wind?windPwind?wind8wind8wind8windwind?wind0wind`windwind@windwind\?wind[?windZPwindT?windSWpwindROwindQWwindP=windM?_windK1PwindJZwindI1 windH?_pwindG?windFuPwindEwindDwindCu0windB?pwind*Zpwind)?wind&wind%wind$> wind#>@wind"pwind!>wind =windpwind1pwindWwind?lM Laufer2003u Leung2001 Lewer Lewis2000 Lewis2000j Lewis2001 Lewis2001" Lewis2001 Lewis2004 Li2002 Liaw1999 Liedtka2002 Little2004 Loucks1999 Louwers2005 Lydenberg1993 Lydenberg2003 MacDonalad2004G MacDougall2001 Mackenzie1998 Mackenzie2000j Mackenzie2001 Maignan2004 Makower1994Malhotra1999P Malone1997 Malotky2003Mandondo1997P Manheim2004 Mani2003| MansleyMarkham Thompson2004Marshall1997oMarshall20030 Martin2002 Mathew2003 Mays2003 McCullough1999McDonald2001 McEwan2001 McGuire2001 McLachlan2003O McLachlan2004McMillan1996P Mele20040> Mendus19999@ Michelson2004P Michelson2004 Miller1998 Miller19999  Millington2004Mills Mistra2004i Mollner2005 Monks2002 Moore2003 MPI2001 Murphy1995 Murphy1996Q Nagel1986{ Nahan2002 Nair2005 Neelankavil1996Nordgren2002P O'Day1999n O'Neill1996=7Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.2001 Pallab2000Paolillo2003P Parker19939  Parker1994 Pava1996 Payne2002 Pearce2005 Perry2001 Peter2002 Pettinger2004S Pettit1986~ Pietilainen2004 Poitras1994 Powell1995 Preece20033 Prior Jonson2001 Pryce2002 Purcell1980 Pustay20055 Quarter Quarter2001 Rae2004kReder Reder1994 Reeve1999 Reilly2000v Resnik2003 Risser1996 Rivoli2003T Rivoli2003 Rodman1998 Rollin1995Rongione1995P Rose2001RosenRosen Rosen2001 Rosenthal2002:Rowlands19999 Rugman2001 SandlerU Scanlon1977V Scanlon1982 ScheerSchepers2003Schermerhorn Jr1999 Schiavo-Campo1999 Schlossberger1994 Schlossberger1998W Schueth1997X Schueth2000Y Schueth2003ZSchwartz2003p[Schwartz2003pD Schwarz1996 Scott2005\ Sen1977 Sethi2003 Sethi2005 Shailer2004Shani Shanks19931 Shanks19941Sharfman1996PShepherd1995Pp SIF2003 SIF2005 Silverstein1993) Sinclair] Singer1991 Singer1999 SIO200,^ Slote1997_ Smart1961h Smith2000 Solnik2000 Solomon1999 Sousa2001 Sparkes2001 Sparkes2002a Sparkes2004 Spiller2000 Stell1995  Stephenson1993 Stewart Stewart1996 Stolovitch1999StoneStrawser2001PcStrudler2003`Sullivan2001SustainAbility2004%Swift Takala2000 Taylor2000 Taylor2001 Taylor2002xTEC!The-Allen-Consulting-Group2000" The-Economist2005 Thomas20030D Thomson1996 Tigner20000u Tippet2001v Tippet2001 Tommasi1999Topp0Topp0 Torrens Tran2000 Tsai19939 Turner1993\van der Heijden2004 Van Helvoort1993 Vega2002 Veit19959 Veit19966 Veit1996 Veit19988 Vitell2003 Vogel1993h Waddock2000i Waddock2002g Waddock2003@ Wailes20040P Wailes20040 Wallace2001 Walley1994  Waring Warren1999o Watson20032 Weaver1995j Webley2001 Webster2001? Weis20000 Whitehead1937 Whitehead1994 Wilcox19988Williams2002Williams2003Williams2005 Willis2002 Winnett2000 Winston2002 Wong2004 Wueste1994 Wulfson2001k Yach20013 Yeomans2005 Yeow0G Zadek2001 Zadek2004 Zhang1996t Zientek2003 Zwetsloot2003e2000j Mackenzie2001 Maignan2004 Makower1994Malhotra1999P Malone1997 Malotky2003Mandondo1997P Manheim2004 Mani2003| MansleyMarkham Thompson2004oMarshall20030 Martin2002 Mathew2003 Mays2003 McCullough1999McDonald2001 McEwan2001 McGuire2001O McLachlan2004McMillan1996P Mele20040> Mendus19999@ Michelson2004P Michelson2004 Miller1998 Miller19999  Millington2004Mills Mistra2004i Moore2003 MPI2001 Murphy1995 Murphy1996Q Nagel1986{ Nahan2002 Neelankavil1996Nordgren2002P O'Day1999n O'Neill1996=7Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.2001 Pallab2000Paolillo2003P Parker19939  Parker1994 Pava1996 Payne2002 Perry2001 Peter2002 Pettinger2004S Pettit1986~ Pietilainen2004 Poitras1994 Powell1995 Prior Jonson2001 Pryce2002 Purcell1980 Pustay20055 Rae2004kReder Reder1994 Reeve1999 Reilly2000v Resnik2003 Risser1996 Rivoli2003T Rivoli2003 Rodman1998 Rollin1995Rongione1995P Rose2001RosenRosen Rosenthal2002:Rowlands19999 Rugman2001 SandlerU Scanlon1977V Scanlon1982 ScheerSchepers2003Schermerhorn Jr1999 Schiavo-Campo1999 Schlossberger1994 Schlossberger1998W Schueth1997X Schueth2000Y Schueth2003Schwartz2003PZSchwartz2003p[Schwartz2003pD Schwarz1996\ Sen1977 Sethi2003 Shailer2004Shani  Shanks19931  Shanks19941Sharfman1996PShepherd1995Pp SIF2003 SIF2005 Silverstein1993) Sinclair] Singer1991 Singer1999^ Slote1997_ Smart1961h Smith2000 Solnik2000 Solomon1999 Sparkes2001 Sparkes2002a Sparkes2004 Spiller2000 Stell1995  Stephenson1993 Stewart Stewart1996 Stolovitch1999StoneStrawser2001PcStrudler2003`Sullivan2001SustainAbility2004%Swift Takala2000 Taylor2000 Taylor2001 Taylor2002xTEC!The-Allen-Consulting-Group2000" The-Economist2005 Thomas20030D Thomson1996u Tippet2001v Tippet2001 Tommasi1999Topp0Topp0 Torrens Tran2000 Tsai19939 Turner1993\van der Heijden2004 Van Helvoort1993 Vega2002 Veit19959 Veit19966 Veit1996 Veit19988 Vitell2003 Vogel1993h Waddock2000i Waddock2002g Waddock2003@ Wailes20040P Wailes20040 Wallace2001 Walley1994  Waring Warren1999o Watson20032 Weaver1995j Webley2001 Webster2001? Weis20000 Whitehead1937 Whitehead1994 Wilcox19988Williams2003 Willis2002 Winnett2000 Winston2002 Wong2004 Wueste1994 Wulfson2001k Yach20013 Yeow0G Zadek2001 Zadek2004 Zhang1996t Zientek2003 Zwetsloot2003y8(4NF7,)E/P<0>' !-6#G:8?2 ".HB$;=&5JA@3 Y??q0??p?6?p0cntlà?xntl?p 0P?P ?p6 ?0Ycntl ?ocntl 5cntl ?ppcntl ?pP Authors*Journals CKeywords L6                               1@ + zAasland, Dag C.Abbarno, G. J. M.Adler, Jonathan H. Albertson, Joshua Ali, PaulAlmond, BrendaAnderson, Digby C. Anon Arbouw, JohnAristondo, JuanArmstrong, Robert W. Arnold, KeithASFAAsian Development Bank.+LASICAslaksen, Julie<8Australia), ASFA (Association of Superannuation Funds ofBaden, John A.Baker, H. Kent Bandow, DougBansal, PratimaBanthin, JoannaBarbut, Monique Barnes, Peter Baue, WilliamBeauchamp, Tom L.Bellet, SuzanneBelliotti, Raymond Bemporad, Jules R. Black, MichaelBoatright, John R. Boatright, John Raymond+LBodwell, CharlesBone, Paula Fitzgerald @Bonvin, Jean MichelBoselovic, LenBrammer, StephenBrennan, Geoffrey Brill, Jack*Brinchmann, Sissel Broadhurst, Arlene I.Broadhurst, DominicBrown, Keith C.Buchholz, Rogene A.Bukovansky, MladaByrne, Edmund F. Camejo, PeterCarmichael, IslaCarpenter, JaniceCarroll, Archie BCarroll, Archie B. Carson, A. ScottCarson, Thomas L.Carswell, Adam0+Centre for Professional Development (Aust.)QChadwick, Ruth F.Chambers, JeanCheong, JosephaChitsomboon, PloyChristensen, Sandra L.(+L Christian-AidChristie, DrewChryssides, George D.Clark, Charles R.Clark, John M.Clark-Murphy, Marilyn Clarke, James Clarke, JuliaClement, Roland C. Cocklin, ChrisCohen, Bennett J. Cohen, Carl*Coltman, Michael M.Corey, Robert JohnCornell, John F.Cosier, Richard A.Cowton, Christopher JCowton, Christopher J.(+L Cox, Paul Coxon, Amy(*Cramer, Jacqueline Crisp, RogerCummings, Lorne SDalton, Dan R.Davidson, AmandaDavidson, ColinDavies, GraemeDavis, StephenDe Grazia, DavidDembinski, Paul H. Den Uyl, Douglas J.$Deni-Green-Consulting-ServicesDerkley, Karin Dewe, PhilipDi Norcia, VincentDillenburg, StephenDiltz, J DavidDoh, Jonathan P. Domini, AmyDommen, DeouardDorn, A. Walter Dreier, JamesDresser, RebeccaDunfee, Thomas W. Duska, RonaldEIRIS Elgie, SusanElkington, John Emerson, JedEnglish, Dan C.Erekson, Homer Ethibel EurosifEverett, Jennifer Ezell, Hank Fayers, ChrisFelicetti, LindaFerling, Rhona L.Ferrell, LindaFerrell, O. C. Ferrell, O.C.Ferrer, Jorge J.  C A 0.618...D?ADWEEK New England Edition0888-0840May 20, 2002, v39 i21, p6(1)D40Africa News ServiceApril 29, 2003, p1008119u8027X($Africa News ServiceMay 21, 2004, pNA, Agriculture and Human Values"41Algemeen Nederlands Tijdschrift voor WijsbegeerteAlternatives Journal4.America0002-7049July 17, 1993, v169, n2, p5(1)3, Analysis Applied Financial EconomicsDB,)AScribe Law News ServiceFeb 23, 2004, pNA@Energy & Environmental Management1460-7530Nov-Dec 2003, p18(2)lDEnvironmental Ethics Erkenntnis Ethical Investor EthicsEthics and Behavior$ Ethics and International AffairsEthics and Medicine0*European Report1021-4267Oct 22, 2003, p343 ($Euroweek0952-7036Feb 15, 2002, p8(1) (%Euroweek0952-7036Feb 22, 2002, p24(1)0*Euroweek0952-7036July 11, 2003 i811, p8(1) (%Euroweek0952-7036June 21, 2002, p7(1)<8Financial Executive0895-4186Nov-Dec 1993, v9, n6, p54(3)Financial PlanningFinancial TimesFinancial World3 FortuneN|40Geographical0016-741XAugust 2002, v74 i8, p48(3) @=Greener Management International0966-9671Spring 2001, p31(14) Gregorianum4/Habitat Australia0310-2939Oct 2000, v28 i5, p28.XHarvard Business ReviewHarvard Law ReviewN|Hastings Center Report$!HealthCare Ethics Committee Forum0+History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences Hypatia  D V,)՜.+,0@ hp ,)****.**+,*0@ hp**** ****0+***Oh*+'**0****** 0<*<0+Oh+'0 0<<i4@*4NormalCJOJPJQJmH ;#. & 3B2A$#6,44G8@ - 7(!-" 7GP-H"" G7):6? -P nt. zk2LWhitehead, T.N.u 193782Social and Political Tendencies of the Present DayHarvard Business Reviewe153u 275-82on fileiHistory Regulation~xThe Role of the Global Reporting Initiative's Sustainability Reporting Guidelines in the Social Screening of Investments Willis, Alan Journal of Business Ethics433233-237 0167-4544Social screening of investments calls not only for investment policy and criteria, but also for information about companies, their policies, practices and performance. The Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) and its June 2000 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines have the potential to significantly improve the usefulness and quality of information reported by companies about their environmental, social and economic impacts and performance. (edited)81Ethics ; Global ; Investment ; Screening ; SocialMr III 03 English 2002"Winnett, Adrian Lewis, Alan 2000vp"You'd have to be green to invest in this": Popular economic models, financial journalism and ethical investment$Journal of Economic Psychology21 319-39abstract on file,%ethical investment economic discourseBgNihHRVogel, David Turner, Tom Barnes, Peter Lydenberg, Steven D. Bandow, Doug Adler, Jonathan H. Silverstein, Michael Henderson, Hazel Foegen, J. H. Parker, Alan Tsai, Frank Frech, J. Clayton 1993(!Can slower growth save the world?n"Business and Society Review85 10-20e A140656136table illustration0019848X@9Corporate Responsibility Audits: Doing Well by Doing Goody Sandra Waddock Neil SmithWORD COUNT: 4857Sloan Management Review Winter 2000 75-83412Responsibility audits are a management tool for demonstrating the potential qualitative and financial benefits of mirroring core values and ethics in day-to-day practice. It is argued that corporate financial performance and socially responsible practices are positively correlated. A responsibility auditing process that improves both the bottom line and a firm's stakeholder relationships with owners, employees, suppliers, customers, local communities, and government entities. Companies typically overlook the hidden costs of problematic or less responsible practices. Examples are cited of how operating responsibly often saves money (in overhead, employee turnover rates, insurance costs, and other value-added expenses) and may even create profitable new opportunities.d]United States; US Corporate responsibility Advantages Financial performance Management audits107955452+Responsibility: The new business imperativeS60Sandra A Waddock Charles Bodwell Samuel B Graves*#The Academy of Management Executive May 2002132-148162OBusinesses today are experiencing profound pressures to reform and improve stakeholder-related practices and their impacts on stakeholders and the natural environment - in short, to manage responsibly as well as profitably. Pressures for expanding the emphasis on profits to managing responsibly derive from 3 general sources: primary stakeholders such as owners, employees, customers, and supplier; secondary stakeholders such as non-governmental organizations, activists, communities, and governments; and general societal trends and institutional forces. The latter include a proliferation of "best of" rankings, the steady emergence and development of global principle and standards that are raising public expectations about corporate responsibility, and new reporting initiatives emphasizing the so-called triple bottom lines of economic, social, and environmental performance. To respond to these pressures, many multinational corporations in particular are developing what has been called total responsibility management systems approaches for managing their responsibilities to stakeholders and the natural environment. This article outlines the dominant pressures pushing the evolution of total responsibility management and present as a managerial framework that highlights the 3 main components of TRM approaches - inspiration (vision), integration, and improvement/innovation - with the indicators inherent to a responsibility measurement approach. `ZUnited States; US Corporate responsibility Corporate management Multinational corporationsSandra Waddock 2003F@Stakeholder performance implications of corporate responsibility>8International Journal of Business Performance Management5e 2,3a114-124p13684892rkUnited States; US Corporate responsibility Shareholder relations Best practice Studies Correlation analysis: Demands for greater integrity - more corporate responsibility - are an increasingly critical element of doing well and doing "good" in today's business environment. Using a definition of corporate citizenship that links stakeholder-related operating practices to corporate responsibility, this paper explores the performance implications of companies treating stakeholders well. Companies face conflicting pressures, one set for profitability and wealth maximization; the other is to manage more responsibly, with more accountability and transparency. Specifically, the paper addresses the ways in which companies can benefit from - or be hurt by - some general emerging institutional pressures that push in the direction of greater responsibility. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]&Walley, Noah Whitehead, Bradley 1994 It's Not Easy Being GreenoHarvard Business Reviewp?i 46-52oon file\Sustainable developmentnThe idea that environmental initiatives will systematically increase profitability has tremendous appeal. Unfortunately, this popular idea is also unrealistic. (46) We do not argue that win-win situations do not exist; in fac, they do, but they are very rare and will likely be overshadowed by the totla cost of a company's environmental program. (46) Gives history of corporate environmental reform: 1970-75: compliance with regulations, fighting reform; mid-late 80s: maturing, managers looked beyond narrow, predominantly technical approach - 'embracing environmental issues without innovating'. The emergence of the win-win mindset is a direct reuslt of the extraordinary success companies achieved in reducing pollution in the second era. (48) 1993 poll found that over two-thirds of Americans do not believe the country must choose between environmental protection and economic development. (48) A120909595hbThe impact of socially responsible investment on human resource management: a conceptual framework Waring, Peter Lewer, JohnHAJournal of Business Ethics0167-4544June 15, 2004, v52 i1, p99(10)^S2p B;The Protection Laboratory Animals: A Response to Stephenson{ Parker, James ("Journal of Medicine and Philosophy194389-394 0360-5310This paper clarifies certain issues raised by Wendell Stephenson ("The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy" 18: 375-388, 1993) about research programs and animal care practices at the Oregon Regional Primate Research Center. It also responds to Stephenson's critique of the National Institute of Health's "Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals". It identifies utilitarianism as the ethical theory underlying Stephenson's critique. Arguing that such an ethical theory is unworkable in addressing concerns about biomedical research and the use of animals the paper defends the "Guide's" reliance on a wider tradition of ethical theories.F?Animal ; Ethics ; Medicine ; Research ; Suffering Stephenson, W Ag 94 English 1994tmThe Association between Corporate Social-Responsibility and Financial Performance: The Paradox of Social Cost$Pava, Moses L. Krausz, Joshua Journal of Business Ethics153{321-357 0167-4544It is generally assumed that common stock investors are exclusively interested in earning the highest level of future cash-flow for a given amount of risk. This view suggests that investors select a well-diversified portfolio of securities to achieve this goal. Accordingly, it is often assumed that investors are unwilling to pay a premium for corporate behavior which can be described as "socially-responsible." Recently, this view has been under increasing attack. According to the Social Investment Forum, at least 538 institutional investors now allocate funds using social screens or criteria. In addition, Alice Tepper Marlin, president of the New York-based Council on Economic Priorities has recently estimated that about $600 billion of invested funds are socially-screened (1992).NHCorporation ; Ethics ; Finance ; Responsibility ; Risk ; Society ; Stock M 96 English 1996$Pearce, John Doh, Jonathan P. 2005:3The High Impact of Collaborative Social Initiatives"MIT Sloan Management Review4463u 30-397 filed under P7CSR collaborationHALooks at principles for CSR initiatives and various case studies.82A Compassionate Autonomy Alternative to SpeciesismPerry, Constance K.{("Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics223O237-246 1386-74150*Many people in the animal welfare community have argued that the use of nonhuman animals in medical research is necessarily based on speciesism, an unjustified prejudice based on species membership. As such it is morally akin to racism and sexism. This is misguided. The combined capacities for autonomy and sentience with the obligations derived from relations support a morally justifiable rationale for using some nonhuman animals in order to limit the risk of harm to humans. There may be a few cases where it is morally better to use a never sentient human than a sentient animal, but these cases are few and would not fulfill the current need for research subjects. The use of nonautonomous animals instead of humans in risky research can be based on solid moral ground. It is not necessarily speciesism.:4Animal ; Autonomy ; Ethics ; Experiment ; Speciesism Je 01 English 20014-Jefferson and the Independence of GenerationsPeter, Kenneth B.oEnvironmental Ethics244371-387e 0163-4275nThomas Jefferson's argument against long-term debt and his theory of usufruct are used to show why each generation is obligated to protect the independence of future generations. This argument forms the theory of "Jeffersonian generational independence." The theory has wide implications for the environmental movement because most environmental problems result in limitations on the liberty of future generations. I compare and defend Jeffersonian generational independence from two alternatives including the investment theory raised by James Madison and the problem of generational interdependence raised by John Passmore or Edmund Burke. (edited)RKEnvironment ; Ethics ; Future Generation; Obligation ; Protection JeffersonWint 2002 English 20021403913277 (pbk.)Pettinger, Richard(!Contemporary strategic management 4.Houndmills, Balsingstoke, Hampshire ; New York Palgrave 2004 xxiv, 520@92004044270 Richard Pettinger. Includes bibliographical references (p. 505-506) and index. Pt. I. The context and environment of strategic management -- 1. Introduction -- 2. Strategic thinking -- 3. The nature of competition -- 4. Analysing the environment -- 5. The foundations of competitive strategy -- Pt. II. Strategic management in practice -- 6. Strategic management in practice -- 7. Investment appraisal -- 8. Strategic management of market segments -- 9. Strategic management of customers and clients -- 10. Strategic management of products and services -- Pt. III. The development of strategic management -- 11. Managing change -- 12. Strategic management and organisation structure -- 13. Strategic approaches to risk management -- 14. Strategic management and ethics -- 15. Strategic performance management -- Pt. IV. Enduring priorities in strategic management -- 16. Leadership -- 17. Organisation development -- 18. Strategic management development -- 19. Strategic management and globalisation -- 20. The strategic management of public services -- 21. Conclusions.d^"Contemporary Strategic Management uses up-to-date organisations and situations such as Barbie, rebuilding Iraq, easyJet and McDonald's to emphasise the practical side of strategy, while at the same time illustrating the theoretical issues involved." "Richard Pettinger discusses strategic analysis and choice, strategic failures and successes, investment appraisal, ethics, implementation and the development of strategic management from a managerial perspective. This approach will appeal especially to MBA and final-year management students who appreciate the 'hands on' feel of the text."--BOOK JACKET.Strategic planning.QGU Logan On Order"Restrictive Consequentialism& Pettit, Philip Brennan, Geoffrey("Australasian Journal of Philosophy64438-455 0004-8402iConsequentialists claim to be able to endorse non-consequentialist modes of deliberation; their opponents typically deny that they can allow this restriction. this paper makes a case for why the consequentialist agent can restrict his deliberation. the key idea is that that may be the only way of promoting certain consequences. a taxonomy is provided of the sorts of consequences which can only be promoted by restrictive decision making.60Act ; Consequentialism ; Ethics ; Self Deception"D 86 ENGLISH JOURNAL-ARTICLE 1986 *+ (Mulligan, ThomasMurphy, Michael R.  Nagel, Thomas Nahan, MikeNair, ChandranNeelankavil, James P.Nelson, James L.Noonan Jr, John T. Nordgren, AndersNunan, RichardNuyens, F. J. C. J. O'Day, Ken(*O'Neill, Onora<7Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.͜ Pallab, PaulPaolillo, Joseph G. P.(+L Parker, Alan Parker, James Pava, Moses LPava, Moses L. Payne, Dinah Pearce, JohnPederson, LauraPerry, Constance K.Peter, Kenneth B.Pettinger, Richard Pettit, PhilipPietilainen, TarjaPoitras, GeoffreyPool, Lisa Van Der Powell, Gary E.Pratt, Cornelius B.Preece, DiannaPrior Jonson, Elizabeth+L Pryce, VickyPurcell, TheodorePustay, Michael W.  Quarter, Jack Rae, Scott B. Reder, Alan*Reeve, James M.Regan, T. O. M.Reilly, Frank K.Resnik, David B.Rhodes, Robert P.Risser, David T.Rivoli, PietraRodman, Kenneth A. Rollin, Bernard E. Rongione, Nicholas  Rose, JamesRosen, Barry N. Rosen, RobertRosenthal, Sandra B.Rowlands, Ian HRugman, Alan M.Ryder, Richard DudleySandler, Dennis M. Sapontzis, S. F.Scanlon, T. M. Scheer, RoddySchepers, DonaldSchermerhorn Jr, John R.LSchiavo-Campo, SalvatoreLSchlossberger, EugeneSchueth, SteveSchwartz, Mark SSchwartz, Mark S.Schwarz, Stephen D. Scott, MikeSelf, Donnie J.Sen, Amartya K.Sethi, S. Prakash Shailer, Greg Shani, David Shanks, NiallSharfman, MarkShepherd, RichardShiu, Godwin Y.SIFSilverstein, MichaelSinclair, Graham Singer, PeterSIOSlote, Michael Smart, John Jamieson Carswell Smith, Neil*Solnik, Bruno H.Solomon, Robert Sousa, JorgeSparkes, RussellSpiller, RodgerSprigge, T. L. S.Stanley, Marjorie T.Stell, Lance K.Stelzer, LeighStephenson, WendellStevenson, GelvinStewart, JulesStewart, KarenStolovitch, Harold D.Stone, Brett A.Strawser, Joyce A. Strudler, AlanSullivan, RorySustainAbilitySwain, Margaret S.  Sweeney, JillSwift, Brendan Takala, T.(*Taylor, RobertTEC Teoh, Hai Yap The-Allen-Consulting-Group The-EconomistThomas, James L.Thomson, Judith Jarvis(+L Tigner, Joyce Tippet, JohnTommasi, DanielTomson, Farol N. Topp, Garry*Torrens, Paul R. Tran, Van Hoa Tsai, Frank* Turner, Tom*Van De Veer, Donaldvan der Heijden, Angelavan der Laan, SandraVan Helvoort, Ton Vega, Gina(*Veit, E. TheodoreVeit, TheodoreVisscher, Maurice BolkesLVitell, Scott J. Vogel, DavidWaddock, SandraWaddock, Sandra A Wailes, NickWallace, William Walley, Noah Waring, PeterWarren, Carl S.Watson, JanetteWeaver, Daniel G. Webley, PaulWebster, FrankWeis, AlexanderWhitehead, BradleyWhitehead, T.N.Wilcox, ShelleyWilliams, Andrew T.Williams, Gill Willis, AlanWinnett, AdrianWinston, MortonWong, Kenman L.Wueste, Daniel E.Wulfson, Myrna Yach, Derek*Yeomans, Matthew Yeow, Leng(* Zack, Jeffrey Zadek, Simon Zhang, Yong*Zientek, David M. Zwetsloot, Gerard I. J. M.LDK8*$0333961250 (cloth) 033396814X (pbk.)("Non-state actors in world politics :3Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire ; New York, N.Y.i Palgrave 2001 xiii, 2942001033120 edited by Daphn Josselin and William Wallace. Includes bibliographical references (p. 261-282) and index. Pt. I. Introduction. The State and Other Actors / Pt. II. Non-State Actors and Principled Beliefs. How Many Divisions? The Catholic Church in World Politics / Political Parties in Global Politics / Does "World Opinion" Exist? / Non-State Actors as Moral Entrepreneurs: A Transnational Perspective on Ethics Networks / Pt. III. Experts and Interests in Global Governance. The "Policy Research" Knowledge Elite and Global Policy Processes / Transnational Corporations and Global Environmental Politics / Mind the Gap: Trade Unions in a Global Age / Policy Networks, Non-State Actors and Internationalized Policy-Making: A Case-Study of Agricultural Trade / Unraveling the Faustian Bargain: Non-State Actors and the Multilateral Agreement on Investment / Pt. IV. The State Under Siege? Outsourcing War / Underworld and Upperworld: Transnational Organized Crime and Global Society / Diasporas in World Politics / The Islamic Movement as Non-State Actor / Pt. V. Conclusion. Non-State Actors in World Politics: The Lessons / The Romance of Non-State Actors /$"The involvement of non-state actors in world politics can hardly be characterized as novel, but intensifying economic and social exchange and the emergence of new modes of international governance have given them much greater visibility and, many would argue, a more central role. Non-State Actors in World Politics analyzes a diverse range of economic, social, legal (and illegal), old and new actors, such as the Catholic Church, trade unions, diasporas, religious movements, transnational corporations and organized crime."--BOOK JACKET.TNGInternational relations. Globalization. Non-governmental organizations.n(!Josselin, Daphne Wallace, Williaml,&QGU Nathan JZ1305 .N66 2001 In LibraryjcOn the Ethics of Corporate Social Responsibility--Considering the Paradigm of Industrial MetabolismJouni, Korhonenh Journal of Business Ethics484m301-315 0167-4544This paper attempts to bridge business ethics to corporate social responsibility including the social and environmental dimensions. The objective of the paper is to suggest a conceptual methodology with which ethics of corporate environmental management tools can be considered. The method includes two stages that are required for a shift away from the current dominant unsustainable paradigm and toward a more sustainable paradigm. (edited)PIBusiness ; Ecology ; Environment ; Ethics ; Social Responsibility Kuhn, TD (III) 03 English 2003jdEvolution and Implementation: A Study of Values, Business Ethics and Corporate Social Responsibility$Joyner, Brenda E. Payne, Dinah Journal of Business Ethics414297-311 0167-4544This study defines and traces the emergence and evolution within the business literature of the concepts of values, business ethics and corporate social responsibility to illustrate the increased emphasis that has been placed on these issues over time. Two organizations that have successfully dealt with these issues were analyzed to identify the links among values, ethics, and corporate social responsibility as they are incorporated into the culture and management of a firm. (edited)JDBusiness Ethics; Corporation ; Ethics ; Social Responsibility; ValueD III 2002 English 200201674544@9Reasons to be ethical: Self-interest and ethical business John Kaler&Journal of Business Ethics; JBE Sep 2000161-173O27 1/2This paper examines the self-interested reasons that businesses can have for ethical behavior. It distinguishes between economic and non-economic reasons and, among the latter, notes those connected with the self-esteem of managers.`YBusiness ethics Self interest Public opinion Morality Studies Consumer attitudes ManagersZTNon-consequentialism, the Person as an End-in-Itself, and the Significance of Status Kamm, F. M.$Philosophy and Public Affairs+214354-389 0048-3915The article discusses the structure of nonconsequentialism--includingoptions not to maximize the good and restrictions based on the harm/not aid distinction and the intention/foresight distinction--in part by way of consideration of works by Kagan, Quinn, and Thomson. Options are connected with the idea of the person as an aid in itselfas are restrictions on harming some to and others. Consideration is also given to when it is permissible to harm some to and others, as in the trolley problem case.haConsequentialism ; Intentionality ; Morality ; Person ; Social Phil Jarvis, J; Kagan, S; Quinn, WFall 92 English 1992Kamp, Jurriaan 200482How Responsible is Socially Responsible Investing? Ode Magazine21on filea"SRI criticism of SRI Hawken\.(www.odemagazine.com/article.php?aID=4055 Kapelus, Paul 2002zMining, Corporate Social Responsibility and the "Community": The Case of Rio Tinto, Richards Bay Minerals and the Mbonambi Journal of Business Ethics393275-296- 0167-4544. paper on file XQAustralian Corporation Ethics Mining Politics Social Responsibility South AfricaneIn recent years, mining companies operating in developing countries have come under increased pressure as opponents have placed them under greater public scrutiny. Mining companies have responded by developing global corporate social responsibility strategies as part of their larger global business strategies. In these strategies, a prominent place is given to their relationship with local communities. (edited)S I 02 English Keefe, Joe 2004.'What is Socially Responsible Investing?Dragonfly Media Decemberon file3 Hawken SRI82defends the SRI industry against Hawken's critiqueTNhttp://www.dragonflymedia.com/portal/featured_stories/200411/hawken_keefe.htmlO~8 0273643401 McEwan, Tom$2,Managing values and beliefs in organisations Harlow, England ; New York $Financial Times Prentice HallT 2001 xviii, 39000069169 Tom McEwan. Includes bibliographical references and index. Pt. I. Corporate social responsibility, business ethics and corporate governance. 1. The integration of corporate social responsibility, business ethics and corporate governance. 2. Moral reasoning and applied ethics. 3. Values, beliefs and Ideologies. 4. Means/ends analysis and its practical applications -- Pt. II. The Internal environment. 5. Individual morality in organisations. 6. Unethical behaviour by individuals in organisations. 7. The individual and computer/information ethics -- Pt. III. Groups. 8. Employment Issues. 9. Discrimination and equal opportunities -- Pt. IV. The external environment. 10. Marketing and consumers. 11. Environmental protection -- Pt. V. Organisations in a global context. 12. International business and the Third World. 13. Ethical Investment -- Pt. VI. Managing values and beliefs in organisations. 14. Organisational culture and stakeholder theory. 15. Corporate social performance, ethical leadership and reputation management.xBusiness ethics.VPQGU GoldCoast HF5387 .M42 2001 In Library QGU Nathan HF5387 .M42 2001 In LibraryMcLachlan, Jonathan  2003LFEthical Investment: A Comparison of Ethical and Conventional InvestorsBusiness Schoolg Brisbane University of QueenslandHonoursTHE 17293 eco (UQ)some pages PC under Methical investorssought to profile ethical vs conventional investors - small sample size - questionairre approach. check highlighted references(!McLachlan, Jonathan Gardner, Johno 2004F?A Comparison of Socially Responsible and Conventional Investorse&Journal of Business Ethics; JBEo521C 11-25i Jun01674544 paper on file^XStudies Personal finance Comparative analysis Social investing Consumer attitudes ethics"Socially responsible investment is a rapidly emerging phenomenon within the field of personal investment. However, the factors that lead investors to choose socially responsible investment products are not well understood, especially in an Australian context. This study provides a comparative examination of conventional and socially responsible investors, with the aim of identifying such factors. A total of 55 conventional investors and 54 ethical investors participated in the study by completing mailed questionnaires about their investment and general behaviour and their attitudes and beliefs. Results indicated some important differences between socially responsible and conventional investors in their beliefs of the importance of ethical issues, their investment decision-making style, and their perceptions of moral intensity. These results support the notion that socially responsible investors differ in critical ways to conventional investors, and are discussed in terms of theoretical and practical implications. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]WORD COUNT: 75680*Corporate Social Investments: Do They Pay?McMillan, G. Steven Journal of Business Ethics153309-314 0167-4544The stock market reaction to two very different corporate social investments (the 1977 Sullivan Principles adoption announcement and the 1990 McDonald's Corporation environmental statement) is explored. A market model event study methodology is employed using daily stock returns. The results are that the stock market appears to have ignored the 1977 announcement, but rewarded the 1990 event. Future research and possible managerial implications are discussed.NGCorporation ; Ethics ; Investment ; Management ; Society ; Stock Market M 96 English 1996bD'l()" BT Financial Group 2004&Position Paper: Business Ethics3 BT Investment ManagementOctoberR*#Filed under 'electronic references'94-Business Ethics material risk risk managementn A120909597Non-governmental organizations, shareholder activism, and socially responsible investments: ethical, strategic, and governance implications60Guay, Terrence Doh, Jonathan P. Sinclair, GrahamHBJournal of Business Ethics0167-4544June 15, 2004, v52 i1, p125(15) Gunther, Marc 2005,%Are Green Funds True to their Colors?rFortune 1513 106-9 7 Febon fileSRI Hawken ethics 0)discusses Hawken's critique of SRI funds.& A120909592:4Financial markets: a tool for social responsibility?$Haigh, Matthew Hazelton, JamesHAJournal of Business Ethics0167-4544June 15, 2004, v52 i1, p59(13) A104970238Socially responsible investing: why so may critics? The frequent criticism of the socially responsible investment industry is misguided, argue Michael Hardiman and Faye Harrison. (Responsible Investing)(Cover Story)O& Hardiman, Michael Harrison, FayeVPJournal of Banking and Financial Services1443-6035June-July 2003, v117 i3, p4(3),&Moral Relativism and Moral Objectivity@:Harman, Gilbert Thomson, Judith Jarvis Schwarz, Stephen D.,%International Philosophical QuarterlyX371113-115 0019-03650*Mr 97 Blackwell : Oxford, 1996 Book-Review 1996PINew CEOs Pursue Their Own Self-Interests by Sacrificing Stakeholder Value*#Harrison, Jeffrey S. Fiet, James O.  Journal of Business Ethics193e301-308I 0167-4544e<6Short-term performance increases that are sometimes observed after CEO successions may be evidence of self-interested behavior. New CEOs may cut allocations to long-term investment areas, such as research and development (R&D), capital equipment and pension funds, in an effect to drive up short-term profits and secure their positions. However, such actions have unfavorable consequences for some stakeholders. This study provides evidence that both R&D and pension funding are reduced subsequent to a succession, even after accounting for industry trends. (edited)<6Chairman ; Ethics ; Self Interest; Stakeholder ; ValueAp II 99 English 1999PRKAnimal Experimentation: Pro and Con Arguments Using the Theory of EvolutionNordgren, Anders*$Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy5f1 23-31 1386-7423:4The theory of evolution has been used in arguments regarding animal experimentation. Two such arguments are analyzed, one against and one in favor. Each argument stresses the relevance of the theory of evolution to normative ethics but attempts explicitly to avoid the so-called naturalistic fallacy. According to the argument against animal experimentation, the theory of evolution 'undermines' the idea of a special human dignity and supports 'moral individualism'. The argument in favor of animal experimentation is based on evolutionary psychology. It states that humans, as all social animals, are speciesist by nature and stresses that this should be taken seriously in normative ethics. This does not mean that animal interests should not be considered, only that vital human interests may outweigh them. (edited):4Animal ; Ethics ; Evolution ; Experimentation ; Pain 2002 English 20026}IH\f_Reply to Spier's Response to "Discourse and Moral Responsibility in Biotechnical Communication"Jamieson, Dale$Science and Engineering Ethics62285-287 1353-3452^What this exchange between me and Professor Spier shows is that even those of us who agree about the most fundamental features of life (e.g., materialism, consequentialism, etc.) can still disagree about the policies that should flow from these commitments. I am skeptical about the benefits of agricultural biotechnology; he apparently is not. But the deeper issue with which we should both be concerned is the apparent inability of ethical discourse to affect this debate, except indirectly by its impact on stock prices and consumer behavior. If I am right about this, the disempowerment of ethical discourse in the face of rapid technological change is a very serious problem indeed. Sometimes in my darker moments I wonder whether we should tell our brightest and most highly motivated students who want to change the world that they should become investment bankers rather than scientists or philosophers.4D=Agriculture ; Biotechnology ; Communication ; Ethics Spier, RAp 2000 English 20001853837660 (hbk.)Jeucken, MarcelZSSustainable finance and banking : the financial sector and the future of the planet London Earthscan Publications Ltd 2001 xviii, 318.(2001002398 Marcel Jeucken. Rev. translation of: Duurzaam bankieren. Includes bibliographical references and index. Foreword / Foreword / 1. Introduction -- Pt. I. Sustainability: A General Introduction. 2. Environmental Consciousness and Sustainable Development. 3. Sustainability: The Challenges for Companies. 4. Sustainability: A Special Role for Banks -- Pt. II. Banking and Sustainability. 5. Sustainability, Markets and Banking Products. 6. Sustainability and Financing Risks. 7. Internal Environmental Care. 8. Organization and Communication about Sustainability -- Pt. III. In Reflection. 9. Sustainable Banking in Perspective: The Cases of 34 International Banks. 10. Sustainable Development: A Paradigm Shift. 11. Towards sustainable banking. App. I. Environmental Performances of Developed Countries -- App. II. Sectoral Changes in the Pursuit of Sustainability: A Dutch Scenario -- App. III. IFC Project Classification for Environmental Assessments -- App. IV. Example of an Environmental Risk Checklist -- App. V. The ICC Business Charter for Sustainable Development: Principles for Environmental Management -- App. VI. UNEP Statement by Financial Institutions on the Environment and Sustainable Development -- App. VII. List of Signatories to the UNEP Statement by Financial Institutions on the Environment and Sustainable Development -- App. VIII. Overview of Characteristics of Selected Banks -- App. IX. An Integral Score for Sustainable Banking -- App. X. Ecological Economics -- App. XI. Zero Growth and Other Solutions? -- App. XII. The Prisoner's Dilemma.& Sustainable development Finance.81QGU Nathan HC79.E5 J4813 2001 DUE: 11/02/05 17:00Behind the green doorMarcel JeuckenFinancial World Aug 2002 41-43yD>Although there is growing awareness by banks of the business case for sustainable development and the risks involved in pursuing anti-environmental policies, the majority remain inactive. Even in the US, where banks can be held legally responsible for pollution, 33% do not conduct environmental risk analyses. Environmental reporting remains a European phenomenon, while North American and Oceanian banks concentrate more on community issues. Out of 34 international banks studied, 60% say they have an environment policy, however, this can be as little as a few sentences.b\Environmental protection Social responsibility Sustainable development International bankingJohnsen, D. Bruce 2003:4Socially Responsible Investing: A Critical Appraisal Journal of Business Ethics433r219-222e 0167-45445on file4-Ethics Investment Social Responsibility Stock/This paper makes three important points regarding socially responsible investing. First, the current methodology involving SRI fund divestiture of the securities of firms that engage in socially irresponsible activity often results in unacceptable unintended consequences. Second, in many cases the proper methodology for SRI funds may be purposely to include the securities of such firms in the portfolio in an effort to internalize socially irresponsible interfirm spillovers. Finally, that SRI fund managers may be able to bond their performance by organizing as closed-end funds subject to takeover and liquidation if the stated socially responsible objectives are not met.Mr III 03 English.'Social Responsibility and the Utilities Jones, Alank Journal of Business Ethics34 3-4219-229 0167-4544tHAThis paper examines recent developments in U.K. utility regulation from a business ethics perspective. The regulatory framework that facilitated privatization of the utility companies has foundations based upon free market principles involving a transfer from regulation to competitive markets wherever possible. (edited){@9Ethics ; Responsibility ; Society ; Stakeholder ; Utility D 01 English 2001jm#:,dKing, Roger J. H.i 2001zVirtue and Community in Business Ethics: A Critical Assessment of Solomon's Aristotelian Approach to Social Responsibility"Journal of Social Philosophy324-487-4997 0047-2786iZSBusiness Ethics Community Ethics Responsibility Society Virtue Aristotle Solomon, R\Wint 01 Englishp(!Klaasen, Johann A. Gay, George R.a 200381Fiduciary Duty and Socially Responsible Investing\*$Philosophy in the Contemporary World101r 49-54 1077-1999-on file<6Duty Ethics Fiduciary Investing Responsibility SocietyInvestment advisers have fiduciary duties to their clients: in this essay, we address those duties. Many advisers refuse to help their clients with 'socially responsible' investment plans, for a variety of reasons, among which are fiduciary concerns. We argue that the reasons generally given not to pursue a religious, environmental, or social investment strategy are mistaken, and, most importantly, that an investment adviser's fiduciary duties may be met while providing such alternatives to clients. (edited)pSpr-Sum 03 Englishb\Voices from Roslin: The Creators of Dolly Discuss Science, Ethics, and Social ResponsibilityKlotzko, Arlene Judith.(Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics72121-140O 0963-1801@9Cloning ; Ethics ; Genetics ; Responsibility ; TechnologySpr 98 English 1998 A84435995Knoll, Michael S.!vpEthical screening in modern financial markets: the conflicting claims underlying socially responsible investment82Business Lawyer0007-6899Feb 2002, v57 i2, p681(47)0947277374 (pbk.)Ethical investment Marrickville, N.S.W.  Choice Books 1997 viii, 194*#Ross Knowles, editor. Bibliography.oNGInvestments Australia. Investments Moral and ethical aspects Australia.@ Knowles, Ross|vQGU GoldCoast HG5892 .E85 1997 In Library QGU Logan HG5892 .E85 1997 In Library QGU Nathan HG5892 .E85 1997 In LibraryThe Business Responsibility for Wealth Distribution in a Globalized Political-Economy Merging Moral Economics and Catholic Social Teaching("Kohls, John Christensen, Sandra L. Journal of Business Ethics353223-234o 0167-4544SJCThis paper asserts that businesses have a responsibility to consider the wealth distribution effects of their wealth-creating decisions. We use arguments from moral economics and Catholic social teaching to support this assertion, deriving decision principles that we apply to the Starbucks fair-trade coffee case. (edited)LFCatholicism ; Distribution ; Ethics ; Global ; Responsibility ; WealthF I 02 English 2002<6Ethical Investing: The Permissibility of Participation Kolers, Avery&Journal of Political Philosophy94 435-452 0963-8016"Ethical investing" is all the rage. But is it even possible? This article argues, cautiously, that it is. Investment pervades our economy, and participants share responsibility for corporate practices. Thus short of outright withdrawal, most people have little hope of avoiding responsibility for immoral practices. Hence, withdrawal seems to be required. This disturbing result is slightly mitigated, however, because shareholder activism can be a valuable reformative tool in deeply flawed systems. Through analogies with consumption and democratic political participation, the conclusions of this paper illuminate not only the ethics of investment but a more-general problem of responsibility in complex institutions.:4Ethics ; Investment ; Participation ; Responsibility D 01 English 20012+Hume, Bioethics, and Philosophy of Medicine0)Kopelman, Loretta M. McCullough, Laurence("Journal of Medicine and Philosophy244315-321 0360-5310jcThis is the first publication devoted to exploring the relation between the philosophy of David Hume and important topics in bioethics, medical ethics, and philosophy of medicine. Contributors discuss how Hume's work informs current debates, such as the moral standing of animals (Tom Beauchamp), the morality of suicide (Ray Frey), the justice of a universal health care system (Larry R. Churchill), the history of medical ethics through John Gregory (Lawrence McCullough), and reconciling demands of professionalism and its limited partiality, with the demands of a just health care system (Loretta Kopelman).("Bioethics ; Ethics ; Medicine Hume Ag 99 English 1999 @ G@HIKLMNWYZdj/4:;?}wzx0ko1l2r3 7ss/89zt:-rq;<=,>?@AB+{C)('D&E|F{G|HI}KL#m~~  M"OPQn SvTUVWXYZ[\p]^_a cxvughi jk tn/q31`0:zQ@Frost, Frederick A. 1995leThe Use of Stakeholder Analysis to Understand Ethical and Moral Issues in the Primary Resource Sector  Journal of Business Ethics148)653-661 0167-4544 paper on fileB7Lifesizing in an Era of Downsizing: An Ethical QuandaryMiller, Robert A. Journal of Business Ethics1715 1693-1700 0167-4544Corporate executives, at the behest of Wall Street, have embraced the heresy of upsizing short-term shareholder profits by downsizing the long-term work force. This restructuring of corporate America, which views the corporation as an investment organization rather than a social organization, has created an ethical quandary by removing from the equation a sense of larger-purpose. This paper proposes a new paradigm, "Lifesizing", to address the issues raised by this ethical quandary. (edited)>8Corporation ; Downsizing ; Ethics ; Profit ; Shareholder N 98 English 1998 A81596637 rkSustainability, socially responsible investment and the outlook of investment professionals in Australia. *<6Mills, Julie Cocklin, Chris Fayers, Chris Holmes, DougD=Greener Management International0966-9671Spring 2001, p31(14)Mollner, Terry 2005piWe Must Go Deeper, Not Cheaper, to Regain Leadership: The SRI Industry Has Done the Good it Set Out to DoDragonfly Media 2005 May  Filed under M&*$Hawken criticism of SRI Spirituality Defends SRI against Hawken critique. Argues aim of SRI was to create new asset class that proved investors didn't have to sacrifice financial returns when investing in companies that have certain positive features. Discusses spiritually responsible investment.d^Hives and Horseshoes, Mintzberg or MacIntyre: What Future for Corporate Social Responsibility? Moore, GeoffBusiness Ethics121 41-53 0962-8770"Who should control the corporation and for what ends?" Drawing on research evidence the paper demonstrates how corporations are simultaneously under pressure from society and responding to its concerns. The paper concludes that these current developments can at best ameliorate the situation, and that what is necessary is to rediscover the notion of corporate virtue, instead of putting virtue at the service of vice. (edited)b\Business ; Control ; Corporation ; Ethics ; Social Responsibility Macintyre, a; Mintzberg, H Ja 03 English 2003'.O`lAs}{Ll_O.' 5G] o/{6<@BBAABA>;5.y o\G5 > Rk/{AJOSUVUTVURMG@/zj R> 0538873566$Corporate financial accounting 6th Cincinnati, Ohio & South-Western College Publishing 19991 v. (various pagings)~w98018409 Carl S. Warren, James M. Reeve, and Philip E. Fess. Ch. 1. Introduction to Accounting and Business -- Ch. 2. Analyzing Transactions -- Ch. 3. The Matching Concept and the Adjusting Process -- Ch. 4. Completing the Accounting Cycle -- Ch. 5. Accounting for Merchandising Businesses -- Ch. 6. Accounting Systems, Internal Controls, and Cash -- Ch. 7. Receivables -- Ch. 8. Inventories -- Ch. 9. Fixed Assets and Intangible Assets -- Ch. 10. Current Liabilities -- Ch. 11. Corporations: Organization, Capital Stock Transactions, and Dividends -- Ch. 12. Corporations: Income and Taxes, Stockholders' Equity, and Investments in Stocks -- Ch. 13. Bonds Payable and Investments in Bonds -- Statement of Cash Flows -- Financial Statement Analysis -- Ch. 14. Introduction to Managerial Accounting and Job Order Cost Systems -- Ch. 15. Process Cost Systems -- Ch. 16. Cost Behavior and Cost-Volume-Profit Analysis -- Ch. 17. Profit Reporting for Management Analysis -- Ch. 18. Budgeting -- Ch. 19. Performance Evaluation Using Variances from Standard Costs -- Ch. 20. Performance Evaluation for Decentralized Operations -- Ch. 21. Differential Analysis and Product Pricing -- Ch. 22. Capital Investment Analysis -- Ch. 23. Cost Allocation and Activity-Based Costing -- Ch. 24. Cost Management for Just-in-Time Manufacturers -- App. A. Interest Tables -- App. B. Codes of Professional Ethics -- App. C. Alternative Methods of Recording Deferrals -- App. D. Special Journals and Subsidiary Ledgers -- App. E. Periodic Inventory Systems for Merchandising Businesses -- App. F. Foreign Currency Transactions -- App. G. Hershey Foods Corporation Annual Report. Corporate Financial Accounting, by Warren, Reeve, and Fess, incorporates innovations both in content and learning methods. This respected author team addresses the needs of both preparers and users of accounting information in an interesting and enlightening manner.("Accounting Corporations Accounting6/Warren, Carl S. Reeve, James M. Fess, Philip E.2+QGU GoldCoast HF5686.C7 W37 1999 In LibraryvXRIn Pursuit of Principle and Profit, Business Success through Social Responsibility&Reder, Alan Introcaso, David M. Journal of Business Ethics1616 1765-1766 0167-4544a4.D 97 Putnam-Penguin : London, 1994 Book-Review 1994 003025809X2,Investment analysis and portfolio management 6th3  Fort Worth  Dryden Press 2000 xxxii, 1242i$Dryden Press series in financePJ99074300 Frank K. Reilly, Keith C. Brown. Includes bibliographical references and indexes. Pt. 1. The Investment Background -- Pt. 2. Developments in Investment Theory -- Pt. 3. Valuation Principles and Practices -- Pt. 4. Analysis and Management of Bonds -- Pt. 5. Analysis of Common Stocks -- Pt. 6. Derivative Security Analysis -- Pt. 7. Investment Companies and Evaluating Portfolio Performance -- App. A. How to Become a Chartered Financial Analyst -- App. B. Code of Ethics and Standards of Professional Conduct -- App. C. Interest Tables -- App. D. Standard Normal Probabilities.>7Investments. Investment analysis. Portfolio management.& Reilly, Frank K. Brown, Keith C.yQGU GoldCoast HG4521 .R396 2000 In Library QGU Logan HG4521 .R396 2000 In Library QGU Nathan HG4521 .R396 2000 In LibrarylfStrengthening the United States' Database Protection Laws: Balancing Public Access and Private ControlResnik, David B.$Science and Engineering Ethics9`3 301-318 1353-3452This paper develops three arguments for increasing the strength of database protection under U.S. law. First, stronger protections would encourage private investment in database development, and private databases have many potential benefits for science and industry. Second, stronger protections would discourage extensive use of private licenses to protect databases and would allow for greater public control over database laws and policies. Third, stronger database protections in the U.S. would harmonize U.S. and E.U. laws and would thus enhance international trade, commerce, and research. The U.S. should therefore follow the European example and develop two tiers of protection for databases. (edited)B;American ; Copyright ; Database ; Ethics ; Private ; Public Jl 03 English 2003&n@| Hassett, Kevin 2004>8'Sin Screening' is Ineffective at Best, Harmful at Worst(!The Chronicle of Higher Educationl5038 B.24 28 Mayon file 0)effectiveness SRI efficient market theory6/Unlikely that SRI will lead to lower returns (unless diversification is affected) because of market efficiencies. Screening probably won't have any effect on the markets. Casinos and tobacco companies are priced on the basis of the profit that market participants wexpect them to earn. It is implusible that the investment policies of nonprofit orgnaisations would significantly change smaking and gambling behaviour or the profits of companies that meet those consumer demands. To the extent that funds are invested in equities, they need to be as boradly diversified as possible. While the Domini list is pretty broad, that is probably because the criteria are not very stringent. But suppose I'm wrong, and SRI really does the effect that its advocates intend. Then the sotry becomes even worse. Say that a wave of SRI takes over American's nonprofit institutions, and that enough other investors adopt the practice that they drive down the prices of 'sinful' companies. Those companies will then have a higher cash flow relative to their price, and as a result can be expected to outperform the market in the future. If only sinners buy those stockes, then sinners will be the investors getting the high returns. Now imagine that you are sitting on a board of an organisation that privides AIDS drugs to poor Africans. If you invest your endowment in SR companies, then you might be able to help a million sick patients next year. If you invest in irrespnsible companies and earn the higher return, then you could hlpe perhaps 1.1 million. Could anyone really aruge that it is ethical to leave 100,000 individuals without treatment because of SRI? While the example is an extreme one, the point is that anything that diminishes the quantity or reliability of cahs available to nonprofit organisations is likely to have signficant human costs. Don't managers then have a responsiblity to maximise the return on their endowments. There are 2 possibilities: either SRI has no effect, in which case it is just window dressing, or it does have an effect, in which case it's an awful idea. ,&Hawken, Paul Natural Capital Institute 2004$Socially Responsible Investing  California Natural Capital InstituteFOctoberton filea$SRI Disclosure Finance ethicstmStrong critique of current approaches to SRI, e.g. makeup of portfolios, financial goals, lack of disclosure.r<6http://www.naturalcapital.org/images/NCI_SRI_10-04.pdf Hawken, Paul 2005(!The Truth About Ethical Investingl AlterNet 2005 Maylon file,ethical funds ethicsF?critique of ethical funds - lack of disclosure, lack of rigour.0*www.alternet.org/module/printversion/21888*$Hawley, James P. Williams, Andrew T. 2002>7Can Universal Owners Be Socially Responsible Investors?e  Camejo, PetereZSThe SRI Advantage : Why Socially Responsible Investing Has Outperformed Financially New Society Publishers 151-71 filed under H,%Universal owners Fiduciary engagementClaim that corporate capitalism is entering a 3rd phase - fiduciary capitalism. Ownership is concentrated in the hands of fiduciary insititutions - pension and mutual funds. Convergence emerging between many of the overall aims of SRI and the imperatives of universal owners. the universal owner captures positive externalities by firms and is harmed by negative externalities because it is affected by the performance of the economy as a whole. They occupy a quasi-public policy position. Reform efforts ahve focused on firm-by-firm corporate governance issues, but they need to complement it with an analysis of the impact that externalities might have on the performance of their portfolios as a whole.*$Hawley, James P. Williams, Andrew T. 2003jdShifting Ground: Emerging Global Corporate Governance Standards and the Rise of Fiduciary CapitalismNovemberPIA paper presented at the Global Standards Conference University of Oxford,&Fiduciary capital Corporate governanceThis paper examines the long-term interests that large institutional owners (e.g. CalPERS, Hermes, USS) have in the development of global corporate governance standards, especially as governance standards increasingly become intertwined with other standards and regime parameters involved in the globalization debates. It argues that institutional owners have a unique perspective and voice to contribute to the formulation of global standards in a variety of areas based on their long-term financial interests. This conclusion is supported by an analytic review of the current state of global corporate governance, including multilateral initiatives (e.g. OECD, World Bank); an analysis of significant institutional investors, the role of various rating agencies (e.g. Fitch, Moodys), the International Corporate Governance Network and the growing role of various NGOs (e.g. CERES, Carbon Disclosure Project) in relation to corporate governance. Finally, the paper examines the strengths and limitations of the authors previously developed arguments about institutional owners as universal owners and the fiduciary capitalism perspective in the context of emerging global corporate governance standards as modified by varying national/regional forms of ownershiphttp://www.stmarys-ca.edu/academics/undergraduate/programs_by_school/school_of_economics_and_business_administration/centers/fidcap/articles/Global_Corporate_Standards_Nov_2003.pdf*$Hawley, James P. Williams, Andrew T. 200560Universal Owners, Fiduciary Duty and Materiality0.618...5a4aJanuaryrFiled under U (UNEP FI)t:3advocacy Universal owners Institutional investmentsPIwww.epa.vic.gov.au/Programs/UNEP/docs/UNEP_FI_Newsletter_January_2005.pdf Heinze, Davidl 1999~Relations Among Corporate Social Responsibility, Financial Soundness, and Investment Value in 22 Manufacturing Industry GroupsEthics and Behaviorl9040331-347 1050-8422on file2.(Corporation Ethics Profit ResponsibilityDoes a relation exist between ethics and profits? This article revisits this age-old question with interesting findings. The latest "Fortune" "America's Most Admired Companies" database is used and arranged into 22 manufacturing industry groups. "Fortune" criteria of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), Financial Soundness (FS), and Investment Value (IV) are relationally analyzed. This article reports which manufacturing industry groups display a close relation between a surrogate measure of ethics (CSR) and profits (FS/IV) and which industries do not. The main finding is that the strength of the relation between CSR (ethics) and profits varies considerably from one manufacturing industry to another. (edited) 1999 English A125797446 Hely, SusanFund with a consciencePersonal Investor Melbourne, Vic.@""Lewis, Alan Mackenzie, Craig 2000>8Support for INvestor Activism among UK Ethical Investors Journal of Business Ethics24 215-22abstract on file.'shareholder activism Consumer attitudes Lewis, Alant 2001hbA focus group study of the motivation to invest: 'ethical/green' and 'ordinary' investors compared$The Journal of Socio-Economics30 331-41abstract on file"Motivation ethical investors Lewis, Alan 2001NHGood Money, Bad Money: The Case of Socially Responsible Investment in UK World Futuresu564e 3995 A79477160WLewis, Michael 2004 The Irresponsible InvestorNew York Times Magazinen 68-71  6 Juneon file*$SRI business schools Business EthicsGoogle float - number 1 rule 'don't be evil'. Founders believe that investors require corporate executives to sell their souls. 1% of their profits to go to the Google Foundation. Investors are given only 1/10 of a vote, while employees with shares will have full voting rights. Looks at how CSR is taught in a business school - not goodness for goodness sake but because it pays. "At some point this feeling good stuff burns out". But if goodness for goodness' sake has no place in public corproations, is it any wonder that the people who work for them exhibit less-than-ideal ethical standards? For that matter, is it surprising, given their necessarily relentless selfishness, that they occuastionally forget exactly for whom they are meant to act selfishly? The pressure applied to people who run public corporations lamost requires them to forget how to be good. Contrast this with Birkenstock USA.{Animal Research, Non-Vegetarianism, and the Moral Status of Animals--Understanding the Impasse of the Animal Rights Problem Li, Hon Lam("Journal of Medicine and Philosophy275 589-615~ 0360-5310i~I offer some reasons for the theory that, compared with human beings, nonhuman animals have some but lesser intrinsic value. On the basis of this theory, I first argue that we do not know how to compare an animal's claim to be free from a more serious type of harm and a human's claim to be free from some lesser type of harm. Second, I explain why utilitarianism is unhelpful in making such comparison. Third, in the case where some animals can be sacrificed for saving a larger number of humans, it is crucial to ask whether animals have the right to life, and I argue that this question is more perplexing than we might think. (edited)JCAnimal Rights; Research ; Social Philosophy; Status ; Vegetarianism O 02 English 2002("0471293059 (cloth acid-free paper)Liaw, K. Thomas("The business of investment banking New York J. Wiley 1999ix, 33798011641 K. Thomas Liaw. Includes bibliographical references and index. Ch. 1. Investment Banking in Global Capital Markets -- Ch. 2. Venture Capital Markets -- Ch. 3. Mergers and Acquisitions -- Ch. 4. Stock Underwriting -- Ch. 5. Underwriting Fixed-Income Securities -- Ch. 6. Asset Securitization -- Ch. 7. Foreign Listing on Wall Street -- Ch. 8. Euromarkets and European Markets -- Ch. 9. Japanese Securities Markets -- Ch. 10. Emerging Markets -- Ch. 11. Trading and Trading Techniques -- Ch. 12. Repurchase Transactions -- Ch. 13. Financial Engineering -- Ch. 14. Money Management -- Ch. 15. Clearing and Settlement -- Ch. 16. Securities Regulation and Ethics -- Ch. 17. Investment Banking Trends and Section 20 -- Glossary: Common Capital Market Terms."The Business of Investment Banking is a complete guide to the major banking activities in today's global marketplace. This convenient, one-volume reference identifies and analyzes key trends worldwide, allowing banking and finance professionals to effectively manage deals and incorporate trends into operations. In The Business of Investment Banking, Professor K. Thomas Liaw goes beyond traditional banking topics and includes extensive coverage of rarely discussed subjects that are integral to investment banking, such as emerging markets, proprietary trading, repurchase transactions, operations, money management, and how foreign firms list on Wall Street."--BOOK JACKET.Investment banking.XQQGU GoldCoast HG4534 .L528 1999 In Library QGU Logan HG4534 .L528 1999 In Library ^j,&Paul Webley Alan Lewis Craig Mackenzie 2001B